Biden and Trump Now Agree: The President Has No Authority To Impose a Nationwide Mask Mandate
If only that signaled a broader respect for legal limits on executive power.
If only that signaled a broader respect for legal limits on executive power.
Government officials think Americans can't handle the truth, an assumption that tends to backfire.
The comparison between Sweden and the U.S. casts doubt on the importance of broad legal restrictions.
The trends suggest that Sweden's less restrictive policy has been more successful at reducing fatal outcomes.
A week after being sued over his arbitrary COVID-19 policy, Gov. Charlie Baker says he will allow arcades to reopen.
A federal lawsuit argues that the distinction drawn by Massachusetts is unconstitutional.
If the goal is minimizing the death toll over the long run, it is too soon to say.
"Economists are accustomed to thinking about tradeoffs," says economist and Nobel laureate Alvin Roth. "It appears that at least in some parts of the ethics community, they are not."
67 percent say they would get vaccinated as soon as an inoculation becomes available.
The risk for the elderly is much higher, probably largely because of preexisting medical conditions.
The assertion, which contradicts the president's own warnings about the virus, is based on a misinterpretation of CDC data.
A new study suggests that a second higher wave of infections can be avoided.
The New York Times thinks so, but the data do not fit that hypothesis very well.
The rhetoric may not be accurate, but it is definitely useful.
The coronavirus pandemic has ushered in an age of sloppy, inaccurate journalism and a heightened need for media literacy.
The study suggests that vaping raises your risk of catching the disease, but only if you stop.
If so, that could be really good news for the rest of the world.
Both major parties defend the Constitution only when it's convenient.
That scenario seems highly implausible based on what we know about the epidemic.
The trend means we should see declining daily deaths in the coming weeks.
Will his blunt self-aggrandizement reinvigorate concerns about presidents who exceed their powers?
The former New York Times SCOTUS reporter does not seem to understand the arguments she is criticizing.
The wide range of estimates reflects real variations as well as methodological differences.
About 40 percent of infected persons show no symptoms but may still transmit disease.
Whitmer's argument is short on facts and legal reasoning.
Cases per 1,000 tests are rising in the majority of states.
Cheap, rapid antigen tests may be on the way—and the FDA has finally approved test pooling.
Meanwhile, the case fatality rate is still falling.
Antibodies may decline, but T-cells could provide effective long-term protection.
We are starting to see the fatal consequences of the recent infection surge.
The paper's claim reflects the same arbitrary distinction between religious and secular activities that churches are challenging in court.
Enable people to act responsibly toward their neighbors and co-workers.
Expanded testing, a younger mix of patients, and improved treatment help explain the seemingly contradictory trends.
Stanford epidemiological model predicts self-flattening while MIT forecasts continued epidemic growth.
If the findings are true, that's really great news.
COVID-19 control measures violate the First Amendment when they arbitrarily favor secular conduct.
Trends in Massachusetts highlight the importance of voluntary changes in behavior.
The evidence suggests Americans are right to wonder.
It could quickly amplify coronavirus testing by tenfold.
The difference implies that the virus is much less deadly than it looks, but it also makes contact tracing a daunting challenge.
U.S. District Judge Gary Sharpe finds that the state's COVID-19 control measures arbitrarily discriminate against religious conduct.
The trend, which may reflect growing defiance of social distancing in some age groups, implies a lower death rate.
The downward trend continued after states began lifting their lockdowns.
New infections are down nationwide but rising in some places as people rebel against government-recommended precautions.
The decision says the "unbridled and unfettered consolidation of authority in one unelected official" violates due process and the separation of powers.
Airborne transmission is the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19.
"My mask protects you, your mask protects me"
Physician Marty Makary vs. epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski on whether "the lockdown saved hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of lives."