Shooting a Fleeing Suspect Who Escapes Still Triggers the Fourth Amendment, Says SCOTUS
"The application of physical force to the body with the intent to restrain is a seizure, even if the person does not submit and is not subdued."
"The application of physical force to the body with the intent to restrain is a seizure, even if the person does not submit and is not subdued."
“There was no immediate danger,” Sotomayor said, yet the police “decided on their own to go in and seize the gun.”
Cracking down on protesters angry about police violence doesn't exactly inspire civic trust.
Rhetoric around the shootings risks putting massage workers everywhere in more danger.
Politicians on the right and the left are coming for your free speech.
The full video shows that Jay Baker was paraphrasing what Robert Aaron Long told investigators about his motivations.
The new HBO documentary looks at what happened before, during, and after the 1978 MOVE shootout in Philadelphia.
"If someone has done something wrong, but not rising to a criminal level, it's perfectly appropriate for an NYPD officer to talk to them."
Union resistance shut down last year’s effort.
Art Acevedo responded to a 2019 drug raid that killed a middle-aged couple with reflexive defensiveness and obstinate obfuscation.
Databases of involuntarily supplied identities make for a plug-and-play surveillance state.
A federal judge protests the Supreme Court’s “rights-without-remedies” Bivens doctrine.
The Supreme Court delivers another blow to a victim of egregious police abuse.
"I've lost everything," says Vicki Baker.
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson denied qualified immunity to the officers involved in Patterson v. United States.
The Ending Qualified Immunity Act of 2021 would no longer let state actors violate your rights without consequence.
Angelo Quinto's family has filed a wrongful death claim.
Strategic politicking, police union influence, or both?
Civil forfeiture reform failed last year. But now more legislators are on board.
The justice weighs in during oral arguments in Lange v. California.
The agency also missed an FBI bulletin citing "specific calls for violence."
What to expect from Joe Biden’s pick for attorney general.
Vague laws are typically vague for a reason.
The ruling denies relief under a state constitutional provision requiring compensation for "taking" or "damaging" of private property by the government. Many other states have similar provisions.
It's a vivid example of why people are demanding alternatives to police responses.
The appeals court concluded that the officers' use of force was reasonable in the circumstances.
A new study provides further evidence that property seizures are driven by financial motives rather than public safety concerns.
A misdemeanor marijuana charge leads to an attempt to take $17,000.
The unfolding legal saga of City of Hayward v. Stoddard-Nunez
Either these police really love playing Sublime at the office, or they came up with a creative way to discourage video streaming of police conduct.
Plus: New Mexico moves to legalize homemade food, the illogic of civil commitments for sex offenders, and more...
"Bad actors will be identified, and the Tampa Police Department will handle it."
Fourth Amendment advocates prevail in Wingate v. Fulford.
The state used civil asset forfeiture to seize Tyson Timbs' car in 2013. His nightmare hasn't ended.
A new case tests the limits of the “community caretaking exception” to the Fourth Amendment.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks