Backpage Judge Accused of Bias Will Remain on Case
Plus: Effort to decriminalize psychedelics gains traction in California, crony capitalism at its worst, and more...
Plus: Effort to decriminalize psychedelics gains traction in California, crony capitalism at its worst, and more...
A moot case about Trump blocking tweets leads to concerns that tech companies have too much control over speech.
The chaos at Lake Washington Institute of Technology is by no means an isolated occurrence.
Civil liberties advocates warn that the legislation threatens activism, journalism, and satire.
The officers knowingly violated the First Amendment, said the court. But that doesn't matter.
Threatening government action to stop "snotty tweets" is not a good look.
When Amazon won't sell your book, you can head to Barnes & Noble. When government cancels your expression, there's nowhere left to go.
Politicians on the right and the left are coming for your free speech.
Texas state senators introduced a bill requiring the national anthem at all pro sports events.
The heavy-handed measure, a direct response to the protests provoked by the shooting of Breonna Taylor, looks like an attempt to deter constitutionally protected activity.
Plus: Problems with the PRO Act, what libertarian feminism isn't, and more...
The case drew national outrage from press freedom groups, who called the prosecution excessive and a threat to journalism.
A California rule and a bill approved by the House seem designed to chill freedom of speech and freedom of association.
Plus: Iowa limits early voting, a prominent sex trafficking "rescue" group relies on psychics, and more...
The federal government weighs in on Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L..
Courts have widely upheld the First Amendment right to hurl choice words or gestures at police.
A broad coalition of groups is asking the Supreme Court to overturn the state's policy.
Plus: The era of sovereign influencers, a new experiment in universal basic income, and more...
These demands obviously violate the First Amendment.
This misguided effort to combat "misinformation" is a brazen assault on free speech.
It's the result of our overly politicized culture where many people like to shame and destroy their enemies, but it is undermining the benefits of free and open dialogue.
Plus: The aftermath of the New York Times' anti-Pornhub crusade, and more...
No amount of parsing can obscure his responsibility for the deadly attack on the Capitol.
He is on firmer ground in arguing that the Senate does not have the authority to try a former president, although that issue is highly contested.
Plus: Oklahoma cosmetologists fight insane licensing requirement, Australia doesn't understand how search engines work, and more...
The op ed, published today, explains why the First Amendment doesn't protect Trump against impeachment and conviction for his role in the attack on the Capitol.
Chief Justice John Roberts says the policy reflects "insufficient appreciation or consideration of the interests at stake."
It’s a terrible idea that violates Section 230, but is it actually unconstitutional? Don’t be so sure.
They also argue that the Senate has no authority to try a former president.
Plus: Oregon decriminalizes hard drugs, Kroger closes stores over hazard pay rule, and more...
The State Bar of Georgia is demanding that the pro-Trump lawyer undergo a mental health evaluation.
Government will happily suppress misinformation in favor of misinformation of its own.
"The only people who broke the law here were the police officers and TBI agents who participated in this flagrantly unconstitutional arrest."
Plus: Biden pushes 8-year path to citizenship, Parler is back, Josh Hawley's book finds new publisher, and more...
Whatever lies the press is telling us, they are ones that at least some of us want to hear.
A further rejoinder to Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman.
Frightening events create openings for attacks on civil liberties.
A rejoinder to Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman.
Unlike the cancellation of Josh Hawley’s book, such criminal charges pose a real threat to freedom of speech.
The impeachment article against the president cites a little-discussed section of the 14th Amendment.
High government officials don't have a First Amendment right to be protected from firing based on their political views. That applies to presidents facing impeachment no less than other officials.
A response to Joshua Blackman and Seth Tillman
Under federal law, incitement to riot does not include "advocacy of ideas" or "expression of belief" unless it endorses violence, which Trump did not do.
Contrary to what the judge who blocked his extradition implied, the Espionage Act does not include an exception for "responsible" journalism.
The more that big social media companies act like they can control what people say, the more competition they encourage.
"I hope my case can start removing senseless boundaries to teletherapy," said Brokamp, who is suing in federal court on First Amendment grounds.
Police response “likely escalated tensions and the potential for violence” say investigators.
The justices emphasized that K-12 schools are currently scheduled to reopen after winter break.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10