Supreme Court

Biden Justice Department Sides Against Free Speech Advocates in Big First Amendment Case

The federal government weighs in on Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L..

|

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments later this term in a case that pits free speech advocates against public school officials who seek to punish students for certain off-campus social media posts. Last week, the Biden Justice Department entered the fray with an amicus brief that opposes the free speech side.

The case is Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. In 2017, a high school freshman and junior varsity cheerleading team member took to the social media site Snapchat in order to complain about her failure to make the varsity cheerleading squad. The student—known by the initials B.L. in court filings because she is a minor—posted a picture of herself and one of her friends with their middle fingers raised accompanied by the text "fuck school fuck softball fuck cheer fuck everything." She was suspended from the team as a result of that post.

B.L. and her parents, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, are now battling the school in court. They argue that the First Amendment flatly prevents school officials from punishing students for such entirely off-campus speech. "In a weekend comment in an evanescent Snapchat message," B.L.'s legal team argued in a court filing, "B.L. swore in expressing her disappointment at not making the varsity team to her friends. The notion that a school can discipline a student for that kind of spontaneous, non-threatening, non-harassing expression is contrary to our First Amendment tradition, and finds no support in [the Supreme Court's] student speech cases."

In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1968), the Supreme Court forbade public school officials from punishing students for exercising their First Amendment rights on school grounds unless the speech at issue "would materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline and in the operation of the school."

In 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit invoked that precedent while ruling in B.L.'s favor. "Tinker does not apply to off-campus speech—that is, speech that is outside school-owned, -operated, or -supervised channels and that is not reasonably interpreted as bearing the school's imprimatur," the appeals court held.

The Biden Justice Department is now asking the Supreme Court to undo B.L.'s sweeping First Amendment victory at the 3rd Circuit. "The court of appeals incorrectly held that off-campus student speech is categorically immune from discipline by public-school officials," the government argued in a friend of the court brief filed in support of the Mahanoy Area School District.

According to the Biden Justice Department, while some off-campus speech deserves constitutional protection, the 3rd Circuit went too far, unfairly hamstringing school officials, who, the government maintained, require significant leeway when it comes to regulating and punishing student speech. "When the student's off-campus speech targets an extracurricular athletic program in which the student participates," the brief argued, "such speech might properly be regarded as school speech that is potentially subject to discipline by school officials if, for instance, it intentionally targets a feature that is essential to or inherent in the athletic program itself."

Oral arguments in Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. have not yet been scheduled.

NEXT: How a Socialist Candidate Plans To Destroy Ecuador’s Currency

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “Biden Justice Department Sides Against Free Speech Advocates in Big First Amendment Case”

    WHHHAAAAAAAAATTTT???

    1. At least Joe Biden defends the First Amendment rights of journalists by not criticizing them or calling them names on Twitter.

      1. Why would he insult the media? They never insult him.

        1. TJ Ducklo would disagree.

          1. It’s sad that I actually had to look him up.

            1. I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work-mhg didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new… after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier.

              Here’s what I do.=========> USA ONLINE JOBS

              1. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings CVCXX are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
                on this page…..work92/7 online

          2. Yes, and look what happened to that snooty little pansy. He forgot that white males cannot make statements like that without repercussions. He will have to reemerge as a Trans person to ever regain the trust of the Democrats.

            1. You mean it’s not already trans?

              1. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little VCD Schild can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
                on this page…..work92/7 online

              2. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a VCXD little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
                on this page…..work92/7 online

              3. I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly make me happy-saq so I decided to take a chance on something new… after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier.

                Here’s what I do.=========> USA ONLINE JOBS

      2. Not as long as they kneel like good lap dogs.

        1. Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money………… READ MORE

        2. Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an sdo easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money………… READ MORE

      3. I have never heard of a Dictator criticizing the sycophants sucking up to him. I don’t see why Biden would be different.

    2. Translation:

      Reason Sad That Opposition to Mean Tweets Leaves Less Freedom.

      1. I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without igp a my doubt, this is the pay easiest and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had. I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally changed my life………… READ MORE

    3. Wrong, but within normal parameters.

      1. I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without dfop a my doubt, this is the pay easiest and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had. I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally changed my life………… READ MORE

    4. Based on the majority of comments, Reason lost a *shit-ton* of credibility by assuming a thoroughly idiotic neutral stance during this last election. 99.9% of its readership knew that Biden/Harris was a *horrific* anti-individual-liberties option, and here we are.
      Some libertarian journal you assholes turned out to be.

      1. Reason was not neutral in the last election. They were all in on anti-Trump and ignoring problems with Biden-Harris.

        1. Agree completely! Was “underplaying” it, so as to render the critique more persuasive.
          Truly, there’s no way Reason can live this one down. The pre-Covid Democratic debate was a race to the seriously-intrusive & authoritarian hard-Left, due to the fact that the economy was sizzling…hence there was not much of substance to carp about. Once Covid hit- – rendering Trump actually vulnerable — anyone could’ve seen this was a disaster (for private liberty concerns) in the making.
          But, hey, we’re spared belligerent tweets. Smart, Reason.

        2. It was very obvious that they were as well, most of the reason roundups by Enb, it was filled with mass anti-trump and pro Biden/Harris.

        3. Libertarian purity test is the useless academic exercise of Reason that does nothing to advance Liberty. The Libertarian presidential candidates are a non factor. There are but a few libertarian leaning politicians in the house and senate. That is where gains can be made but a purity test will ensure we don’t even move in that direction.

          1. No True Liberterian?

      2. 494 Biden articles between March 1st – November 3rd, 2020 would like to disagree with your assessment of Reason: https://reason.com/search/biden/
        “There’s no telling where the destruction wrought by a President Joe Biden would end.” – Reason Magazine Nov. 2nd, 2020.

        1. Give me a break. The threat level to libertarian interests as embodied by Trump was absolutely *negligible* as compared to that promised by Biden/Harris. Yet, on a daily basis, anti-Trump appeared on a consistent basis—yep, notwithstanding your crazy-impressive research.
          It was, AT BEST, a “pox on both houses” stance. And that’s not even arguable, unless you’re feeling all contrarian n’ stuff.

          1. *anti-Trump articles

          2. Awesome, you are suffering from cognitive dissonance, thanks for the clarification on this!

            1. You’re an idiot with reading comprehension problems. Reason’s articles were absolutely antiTrump while refusing to report on any serious issues with Biden/Harris.

              Grow up.

        2. So you show a count of 494 Biden articles, where ONE shows some apprehension about Biden, and that’s a majority?

      3. Neutral????

        LOL

        1. They were ‘neutral’ to the extent that they are ‘libertarians.’

    5. Power and control knows no political affiliation. Presidents come and go, but the apparatus under it all remains in trying to exert more power and control.

      1. Thank you. I didn’t vote for Trump either time, but spent these years making people think I did by constantly pointing out the Democrats were running an unending 4 year moving target investigation into a political enemy, which you are not supposed to do.

        The nadir was Democrats gleefully latching onto the power of impeachment investigations, making public statements how awesome it was to be able to ignore the 4th Amendment.

        Like the Phantom Menace, the real danger to freedoms long term wasn’t a 4 year clown, but things like the above, sadly largely ignored in angry pursuit of power to defeat a political enemy.

        1. PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple works from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
          on this page…. JOBS APP

    6. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple works from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
      on this page…. Visit Here

    7. Best thing about this job for me is that I find it interesting… It doesn’t even feel like a job to me! I mean even when I am on computer in my spare time I would be hanging on the internet and here I can do the same thing and in the same time get paid for it! It’s perfect! Visit Here….
      ChechIT

    8. Why do all progressives want to be knuckles deep in everyone else’s… lives? Grow up!

    9. Behold the glory of my shocked face!

  2. “B.L. went on to post other vulgar messages on social media, including ‘Fuck trannies, Fuck niggers, Fuck kikes, and Fuck jannies too!'”
    Based?

    1. Jannies?

      1. They do it for free.

      2. Janitors, aka moderators, people whose job it is to scrub illegal content of one type or another, or other stuff that violates web site rules.

    2. Don’t forget to fuck crackers.

      1. Impossible. They break too easy and the salt is an irritant.

        1. Have you tried oyster crackers? Pretty sure you can get them salt free.

          1. Yeah, but the sex is awful.

    3. After Quiting my office job I was looking for a job which is not only financially benificial but also less time consuming so that I spend some time with my family. After a lot of research I noticed that only online work has that kind of credibility. But in past two years I Worked at many sites and all of them were spammer. But for the last 4 months I have been working on a website which is not only Popular world wide but also US certified. I am earning upto 15000 dollars a month by working only 2 hours a day. Go to Home MEDIA TECH INFO TAB for further information.>> HITME

  3. What a fucking joke.

    Imagine watching Billy Madison, Mean Girls, Fast Times At Ridgemont High, or Animal House with someone and, at the end of the film, they said, “Pretty thought provoking. Very reminiscent of Training Day or American History X.”

    1. people on ludes should not drive.

      1. Sean Penn was much more entertaining then.

    2. Mean Girls? I feel like I’m living that movie here in the comments! Waaahhhhhh!

    3. Mean Girls is one of my favorites. But there is a thought-provoking scene at the end, when they purposely made that girl from the other team (“uh, we pick the girl too”) look like garbage so that the smokeshow (Lohan) can come to the realization that even ugly girls can beat her in math… then they throw that all out the window when the ugly, nerdy girl doesn’t win; the popular, pretty girl wins. #lessonlearnt

  4. So profanity laced rants are protected speech, but true statements citing peer reviewed research are hate speech if they don’t follow the fascist narrative.
    Got it.

  5. The purpose of public schools is to indoctrinate children according to progressives. This is one of the reasons why progressives are among American’s most horrible people.

    1. It’s also why they’re one of the most powerful now, too.

      1. Yes, they very powerful in Chicago. The Chicago Public Schools keeps the party rolling. How is that working out for the law abiding taxpayers and their kids?

        1. “How is that working out for the law abiding taxpayers and their kids?”

          We’ll see how everything works out after the next municipal elections. Revealed preferences FTW.

    2. Says the man who has expressed that he is not some peasant dumb enough to buy into the Big Lie, but the Big Lie is quite useful for convincing his dumber brethren (Nardz, Jesse, Etc) that Trump is a demigod worth dying over, and Biden, despite his 40 year voting record as a milquetoast corporate democrat, is actually a blood-thirsty Stalinist.

      Yeah, that seems like one of the worst types of people in America to me.

      1. So, you are fine with the government indoctrinating children in government run schools?

        1. He’s a leftist, so yes.

      2. Biden, despite his 40 year voting record as a milquetoast corporate democrat, is actually a blood-thirsty Stalinist.

        What’s the pro-war vote count? How many wars did Trump vote for and how many did Biden?

      3. A 40 year war-hawk as our president? Yes, that sounds awful, unless you like more wars and killing of innocence. Then again they’re killing people far away and the state says they’re bad, so of course you’re fine with it. Fucking retarded bootlicker.

      4. We already know you’re fucking stupid. Government paying for abortions, title IX roll back, GND, gun registry, no genders…

        Totally common. Fucking leftist retard. Amazing what you have to lie to yourself about stolen Valor.

        1. You should take this up with Ken, really. He’s the one who thinks you are a useful idiot.

    3. The purpose of public schools is to indoctrinate children according to progressives. This is one of the reasons why Republicans are among American’s most horrible people.

      1. Fuck off and die, asshole.

    4. Progressives, according to the right wing, literally controls every single thing, yet they just cannot seem to win a majority of elections. That means they are absolutely terrible at indoctrination or it is a right wing lie.

      1. I notice that you don’t actually try to dispute the idea that progressives control primary and secondary schools, universities, 95% of the media, most corporations and 100% of big tech.

        The reason that they don’t win 100% of elections is that they keep moving the center of the playing field to the left. Every time another another of their indoctrinated, young cohorts gets to voting age, their demands get more extreme.

        Now we are talking about $15 (or $25?) minimum wage, open borders and transsexuals dominating women’s sports.

  6. Congratulations, Reason. You got exactly what you wanted.

  7. Wait, I just read in the Roundup that it’s Republicans who misunderstand the First Amendment.

    1. Republicans cited in that article include kamala harris

      1. The Dems are moving to the left so fast, Kamala will end up a moderate Republican before she is out of office.

  8. The basic premise of the Biden administration is that students in government schools have no freedom to speak in any way that reflects poorly on government schools, which is really just a necessary precursor for it to argue in the future that nobody has the right to criticize the government at all. Authoritarian incrementalism. Nobody that has been paying attention should be surprised by any of these positions.

    1. And yet Reason appears surprised.

      1. Rule number one of Dumb Cult Club:

        Never stop crying, complaining, and simultaneously claiming majority and oppressed status.

        1. So, you support the curtailment of speech critical of the government?

          1. Not just that, he supports mowing down people with Apache helicopters if they’re critical of government.

            1. Like with the blades?

              1. Probably!

        2. You sure read a lot into such a short sentence that contained none of that.

          1. It fairly accurately describes the left and Hillary fans between 2016 and 2020.

            Although I don’t think that was his intent.

        3. We get it, you’re fucking retarded.

          Damn biden cultists.

        4. Rule number one of Dumb Cult Club:
          Never stop crying, complaining, and simultaneously claiming majority and oppressed status

          But enough about Megan and Harry….and Oprah.

      2. No indication of that in this article.

        1. Plenty of indication of that from their overall coverage before and after the election.

          It’s ok if you can’t see that though, it requires some thought and assessment.

  9. The students should have donned BLM shirts and and then written their negative statements on the school building with spray paint. Joe and the Ho are “down with that”.

    1. Joe and the Ho. I’m stealing it.

      1. Still no love or traction for “JoKalama?” Sad. Biggly.

        1. Kamala Harrison Bergeron

  10. Of course Biden did.

    Those who wish to gain or maintain power over others want to be entitled to violate any rights anytime they want.

    We just witnessed the sitting president of the United States get canceled under the illegitimate pretence of impeachment. He and everyone who identified evidence of election fraud had their inalienable rights violated by the democrats and the media oligarchs they are in collusion with.

    This is the way it is, it is just censored from the news people rely upon for world view information.

    1. Hey what did Bush and Trump find with their election fraud investigations?
      Republicans wanted to ax section 209 for the same damn purpose of silencing those they disagree with.

      1. Anyone wanting to obtain or maintain coercive power over the masses must censor them.

        That’s supposed to be prevented through the inalienable right of free speech.

        It doesn’t make it right when the political party we associate with does it. We shouldn’t look the other way. That is how the masses are divided and conquered by the oligarchs who are the real force of coercion regardless of the party in power on any particular day.

  11. Apparently the Third Circuit’s decision is inconsistent with every other Circuit that addressed the issue, or so claim the Petitioners. Other circuits – 2d, 4th, 5th, 8th and 9th – hold that Tinker does apply to off-campus speech.

    Interesting to see how this case gets decided.

    1. I’m sure it’s as even-handed and thought-provoking as “Transgendered Wix/Wizardexx or polyjuice addict? You decide!”

    2. Fucking weirdos. “Artists”…

  12. Only a Neanderthal would support a prehistoric document like the Constitution.

    1. Written and signed by slave owners.

      1. Slave owners who laid the philosophical and intellectual groundwork for the nation to abolish slavery within its own borders at enormous human cost.

        Slavery wasn’t unique to the United States or the west. Abolishing it at great cost was.

        1. Context and nuance?? That’s not very Twitterish.

  13. Anybody who is smart would stay off public social media accounts accessible by the Stalinists and their boot licker leftie trolls.

    But yeah Biden and his far left cadre are gonna try everything they can to fuck over your rights. Thanks reason for pimping them.

    1. don’t forget, a majority of ‘libertarian’ reason journalists voted for biden, and wrote articles for months supporting his campaign.

      1. Reason journalists hang around with lefties and absorb ideas by osmosis. They found that cursing Trump was “cool” and, wanting to sit at the cool kids table, so hey ignored Biden’s hard core left wing authoritarian statements. “Most Progressive administration in history”, “huge tax increases”, ” re-regulation”, “end fracking” all were forgotten in the tide of conformity to the lefty norms around them.

    2. The idea only one party wants to control you and speech is what makes you partisans so stupid.

      1. Name the last time anyone in the Trump administration suppressed someone’s speech.

  14. >> punish students for certain off-campus social media posts

    “certain”.

  15. And the root of the problem?
    AGAIN!
    Commie-School.
    It’s amazing so many Americans have embraced communism and socialism when any non-boiling frog can see as clear as day; those two ideologies are EXACTLY why the USA is failing.

  16. “When the student’s off-campus speech targets an extracurricular athletic program”

    Interesting that the government finds it necessary to use the, um, provocative term “targets” as opposed to, say, “mentions”.

    1. If there was a prequel to 1984, we’d be almost done with it now.

      1. 1692?

        1. +1 Salem Witch Trials

  17. My guess is that, if she’d said ‘F*** Fascists she’d have no problem.

    1. In a pussy hat

    2. Unless, of course, the “fascists” she was speaking of were the Superintendent and the school board. Then watch the fun that would follow.

    3. F*** Trump.
      F*** Republicans
      F*** capitalism

      The rules are bad enough. The uneven application of them is even worse.

  18. Thank goodness orange man and his literal Hitler tweets are gone and we are building hope and change back better.

  19. Why don’t we just adopt Twitter’s terms of service as our national constitution?

    1. Ezra Klein approves!

  20. We all know why Biden opposes this. He wants to punish students who speak “hate speech” outside of schools.

    1. He wants to punish students who say things against teachers. He is a fully owned subsidiary of teachers’ unions who, in turn, are in thrall to the Woke-Supremacy movement.

  21. Breaking point; are we there yet?

  22. Sorry , please remind me..
    Why do you turn your child over to the government for an indoctrination disguised as an education?

    1. Because you don’t have a choice about it?

      1. ^This; Gov-Guns threatening “The People” and FORCING them to pay for something that might otherwise be avoided.

        One of governments favorite manipulations is signing everyone up for ‘welfare’ programs automatically (i.e. communism) instead of just having ONE program for the truly needy.

  23. And Fuck You, Snowflake. “Fuck cheer” sure sounds like a resignation from the team to me. Shut up and find another hobby.

  24. Wait, a progressive administration isn’t cool with free speech? Call me shocked!

  25. Isn’t that kind of like Disney punishing people for what they say on social media?

    1. Disney is a private entity. You don’t have to deal with Disney. You can watch Netflix and go to Six Flags if you, like I, despise Disney. Don’t take a job working for them. Tell your friends Disney sucks.

      The government takes your money (supposedly to protect your rights) and this is a government school. No government supported entity can “punish” you for speech without violating your rights.

      1. NOBODY can punish ANYONE for exercising their rights without violating them.

        That’s what makes a right INALIENABLE.

  26. The legal argument against 1A is always stupid when you get down to the “facts” of the case, but this one in particular is especially stupid because the school is contending that it can’t do it’s job while also being criticized off campus. In other words, that they don’t have any real authority over the kids, that they have not earned their respect, and that they don’t want more kids waking up to the reality that their school leadership is inept. We’re the adults and WE’RE IN CHARGE!

    This is why we call oppressive regimes nanny states.

  27. I have never heard of a Dictator the supported free speech. Biden or his team are no different.

    1. But without a Gov-God dictator all the little dictator minions (i.e. Democrats) won’t get their daily injection of lazy & selfish self-importance by planning the ‘slaves’ life schedules of their PLANStation.

  28. “the Supreme Court forbade public school officials from punishing students…” is NOT English. In real English we say, “the Supreme Court forbade public school officials to punish students….”

    1. Both forms are common; neither is incorrect. In this case, the latter sounds stilted, however.

      1. Howz kould wez liv withouts dem gremmer poliz?

  29. Public Schools/Teacher Unions are above the bill of rights..above liberty..above everything…Authoritarianism over all.

  30. Shut up, you racists!

  31. Can we just make it easy and say Biden Justice Dep’t sides against the Constitution of the US?

    We all know it’s true.

    1. The Democratic Party as a whole has a reputation for being Anti-USA and Pro-Nazi.

  32. How can we possibly come to an informed opinion about the merits of this case when the article doesn’t even specify the student’s race, political affiliations, sexual orientation, or gender identification?

    -jcr

    1. ^Right! I just gone done watching a congress speech outlining the ‘demands’ of federal education funding on kindergarten and up students of which literally required teaching exactly what you’ve just stated.

  33. The children being indoctrinated are not to publicly disparage the clergy of the Holy Teacher’s Union without punishment. These are sacred matters to the Democrats.

  34. I feel that the best outcome pretty much aligns with common sense.

    1. That must be very confusing for you.

      1. I’ve been slapped with the “book smart, not street smart” thing my whole life.

        That was true until I figured out, during the pandemic, that you can learn anything if you practice hard enough. All the more so if you’re book smart.

  35. However, if they are not qualified for it, they can still get the regular credit card we mention in the list. https://getmyoffer.life/

  36. Hey, thanks for sharing this type of information. thanks a lot
    https://www.thecosmostips.com/crpf-full-form.html

  37. “When the student’s off-campus speech targets an extracurricular athletic program in which the student participates,” the brief argued, “such speech might properly be regarded as school speech that is potentially subject to discipline by school officials if, for instance, it intentionally targets a feature that is essential to or inherent in the athletic program itself.”

    This ought to make anyone who loves liberty shudder. The girl criticized the school, albeit in a crude and childish way. Guess what? That is what the core of the First Amendment protects, criticism of the government and government agencies, like a public school. That school officials think that something is “essential” or “inherent” does not make it immune from criticism, or exempt from the First Amendment.

    It would be one thing if she had called for some negative action to be done at the school — harass Johnny, or call Jane names, or shun Sam. That would be calling for action at the school against other students. That could be, IMO, subject to school discipline.

    But criticize the school’s activities? Tough noogies, that comes with being a public school and being supported by the taxpayers.

  38. Liberty is the enemy of progressives.

  39. A teenage can’t say “f*** school” – which I’d bet most of us did at one point. But a guy can say, “Hey, I’m a chick now”, lace up his cleats and race against real girls. What is wrong with these people?

  40. 8-1 SCOTUS 1st amendment case, guess who was the 1 and why?

    In a near-unanimous ruling (8-1), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that government officials must be held accountable when they violate constitutionally protected freedoms. The ruling came in a case involving two former students – Chike Uzuegbunam and Joseph Bradford – who were stopped by Georgia Gwinnett College officials from sharing their faith publicly on campus in the summer of 2016.

    One News Now related the following comments by Uzuegbunam in an earlier story:

    “First, they said I could only speak in the two tiny speech zones, and only then at prescribed times and with a reservation. Later, when I was standing in the speech zone I had reserved, I was told I could not speak at all, and all I wanted to do was share the good news of Jesus Christ and how He offers us eternal life freely.”

    Over two dozen groups, including the American Center for Law and Justice, the Christian Legal Society, the American Humanist Association, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), filed amicus briefs supporting Uzuegbunam and Bradford.

    The sole dissenter in today’s ruling was Chief Justice John Roberts, arguing the case is moot because the two are no longer students at the college, the challenged restrictions no longer exist, and the petitioners haven’t alleged actual damages.

  41. The Teacher’s Union disapproved so Biden wants to shutdown free speech. Public school teachers, the single least productive “professionals” in the US, feel that they should never be criticized. Compared to 50 years ago, doctors handle more patients, lawyers handle more cases, engineers do more designs but public school teachers teach fewer students and do a worse job. California teachers simply refuse to work at all and insist on being paid anyway.

    It’s time to do more than simply abolish public education. It’s time to separate education and state for the same reason as the separation of church and state – ideas are too important to be controlled by the government.

  42. Democrats violating the First Amendment, which their Oath of Office contract includes, has always been a losing strategy for Democrats (ie: Tipper Gore trying to censor music, video games, etc).

    Democrats should support our Constitution, which actually very progressive. Of the 27 constitutional-amendments added since 1791, most Republicans only support 2 or 3 amendments out of 27 (less than 12%). Most Democrats support 90% of all constitutional amendments.

    Democrats could easily become the “Constitution Party” by simply following most Judicial Branch court rulings on constitutionality. Contrary to popular belief, most rights like women’s rights, African-American rights, LGBT rights, etc started in the courts using constitutional arguments NOT started by either political party. Political parties almost always “follow” court rulings.

    Biden is a good man but this is a bad move. Biden could also grab an easy half-a-billion tax dollars by simply closing Guantanamo and switching to domestic Supermax prisons. Democrats always lose by violating the U.S. Constitution.

    1. In a very long, public career, Biden has been accused of being a lot of things, but being a “good man” is not amongst them.

      Have you ever even visited the US? Because you talk like someone who just got here and only sees our Vichy press.

  43. meanwhile, in news apparently unrelated to libertarian concerns, the nation’s capital is going to be permanently occupied by the military in order to chase around phantom BlueAnon conspiracy theories

    http://ace.mu.nu/archives/393105.php

    “This could be done by mobilizing military police from Guard elements across the U.S. on rotations of three to six months,” the task force’s report states. “Another option would be to create a QRF that permanently resides within the D.C. Guard by reestablishing a military police battalion and staffing it with active Guard reserve troops who live in or near the city year-round, perpetually on active duty.”

    Kyle Shideler @ShidelerK
    Remember when recommending temporarily using the guard to suppress deadly riots in multiple cities was something you couldn’t propose in the NYT?

  44. oh yeah they love 1A almost as much as love 2A

    https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/09/new-colorado-senate-bill-establishes-government-ministry-of-truth/

    enjoy Reason before it goes on the “disinformation” list

  45. It’s one this for the coach of a team to punish a players for off-field actions but I don’t understand why the Biden Administration wants to overturn this ruling. Why would the Administration want schools to have more leeway to discipline students for off-campus, after school comments that are not threatening?

    1. Anyone wanting to obtain or maintain coercive power over the masses must censor them.

      That’s supposed to be prevented through the inalienable right of free speech.

      It doesn’t make it right when the political party we associate with does it. We shouldn’t look the other way. That is how the masses are divided and conquered by the oligarchs who are the real force of coercion regardless of the party in power on any particular day.

      When anyone is punished for exercising their inalienable rights, their rights have been violated.

  46. This is what Reason worked hard to bring about because all of their employees are just super serious, and highly principled people, not unsophisticated rubes like those deplorables and their concerns for free speech.

    Biden does something daily that is more offensive to liberty than anything Trump did in four years, yet the leading libertarian publication cheered on this demented, diaper filling tyrant to take his place because they value not being seen as boorish or crass far more than they do our freedoms.

  47. this is great blog and author is great storyteller. http://americanexpresscomconfirmcard.buzz/

  48. trumph was great leader i think. https://panoramacharter.wiki/

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.