Judge Agrees Consumers Can Sue Over Misleading Movie Trailers
The weird judge-invented "commercial speech" exception to our right to free expression breeds strange results in suit against distributors of the 2019 movie Yesterday.
The weird judge-invented "commercial speech" exception to our right to free expression breeds strange results in suit against distributors of the 2019 movie Yesterday.
Some conservatives toss “parents’ rights” out the window in a holiday culture war against kids at live shows.
The IODA aims to edit the legal defintion of "obscenity" to allow for the regulation of most pornography. But even if it passes, a nationwide porn ban is unlikely to succeed.
District court's opinion in Gruber v. Bruce shows problem with how Pickering balancing is done
Maybe the FBI has something better to do with its time?
Property owners are required to get permission from the city, the NFL, and/or the private Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee before displaying temporary advertisements and signs.
Plus: Sen. Mike Lee wants to remove First Amendment protections for porn, IRS doxxes taxpayers, and more...
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook at 1 p.m. Eastern for a live analysis of the internal Twitter documents recently published by Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss, and Michael Shellenberger.
The most disturbing aspect of the “Twitter Files” is the platform’s cozy relationship with federal officials who demanded suppression of speech they considered dangerous.
Plus: The editors briefly celebrate a noteworthy shake-up in the Senate.
The city of Vallejo, California, has paid millions in recent years to settle excessive force lawsuits against its heavy-handed police force.
Content moderators had "weekly confabs" with law enforcement officials, reports Matt Taibbi.
Instead of debating whether the platform has been flooded by bigotry, Elon Musk should tell the congressman to mind his own business.
A website designer asks SCOTUS to let her eschew work that contradicts her opposition to gay marriage.
Plus: The editors consider a listener question on the involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.
"The state of New York can't turn bloggers into Big Brother, but it's trying to do just that," said FIRE attorney Daniel Ortner.
A million hypotheticals bloom in arguments over when and where the government may compel speech.
The Twitter Files are interesting but contain few true surprises. A mix of incompetence and partisanship got the site in trouble.
Plus: Freedom's Furies, SCOTUS to take up student loan forgiveness plan, and more...
It's a private company. Its owner can do what he chooses, even if it seems crazy.
Plus: Court rejects Biden plea on student loan plan, Ohio cops don't understand the First Amendment, and more...
Elon Musk's rescission of the platform's prior policy, which forbade dissent from official guidance, is consistent with his promise of lighter moderation.
The Justice Department’s discretion is the only thing that protects them from a similar fate.
The open letter warns the indictment “threatens to undermine America’s First Amendment and the freedom of the press.”
While "the 26 words that created the internet" have been under fire from both sides, two groups argue that the 1996 law is essential to the future of abortion rights.
The state's ban applies unless the property owner posts a sign allowing firearms or otherwise gives "express consent."
The state is threatening to punish doctors whose advice deviates from the "scientific consensus."
On Tuesday night, Trump spokesperson Liz Harrington made the baffling claim that, if mainstream news channels failed to air the former president's campaign announcement in full, it would mean that "we do not have the First Amendment."
On Thursday, a federal court granted a preliminary injunction against the portion of the law applying to higher education, with one judge describing the law as "positively dystopian."
Two chapters of the organization say the law violates the First Amendment.
Monique Owens shouted over critical speakers at a September city council meeting, claiming it was her "First Amendment right."
If the bird site's new owner wants to protect free speech, he should focus on resisting government requests to remove content.
No one is confused about whether Tofurky is turkey.
Collin College fired Suzanne Jones in 2021, after she voiced support for union activity and the removal of Confederate monuments.
Priscilla Villarreal found herself in a jail cell for publishing two routine stories. A federal court still can't decide what to do about that.
The crucial protector of internet speech might have some cracks in its armor.
The law authorizes regulators to discipline physicians who deviate from the "contemporary scientific consensus."
On Tuesday, the senator erroneously claimed that "free speech does not include spreading misinformation."
Plus: The emptiness of Democrats' pro-democracy rhetoric, the real reason Social Security checks are getting bigger, and more...
The two fake news organizations want the Supreme Court to review the case of a man who was arrested for making fun of the police.
Plus: Hate speech is free speech, tax gap is stable, and more...
The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI regularly report misinformation and disinformation to tech companies for potential removal.
My new paper on the First Amendment, Pickering balancing, and extramural speech
Plus: Charlottesville cracks down on city employee speech, judge dismisses "blackout challenge" lawsuit against TikTok, and more...
On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito repeated the common myth that "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater" is unprotected speech.
Plus: Fiona Apple fights for court transparency, ACLU asks SCOTUS to consider boycott ban, and more...
Plus: Copyright versus the internet, roofer helping rebuild hurricane-damaged Florida houses arrested for lack of Florida license, and more...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10