Rand Paul Tries (Again!) To Make It Harder for Police To Take Your Stuff
Federal civil asset forfeiture bill reintroduced as police reform efforts hit a partisan wall.
Federal civil asset forfeiture bill reintroduced as police reform efforts hit a partisan wall.
It’s an attempt to bypass Fourth and Fifth Amendment protections by insisting it’s not an arrest.
Under its "crime-free housing program," Granite City, Illinois, holds tenants strictly liable for illegal activity by a household member.
Surrender the Fifth Amendment or the dog dies.
Compelled use of facial and finger recognition features runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment.
The Supreme Court should reconsider the misbegotten "dual sovereignty" doctrine.
Cases in which a majority of the Court fell down on the job.
State and local officials are doling out $4.5 billion and 1,000 acres to lure the Taiwanese manufacturing giant.
The right approach, in my view.
The Louisiana Supreme Court denied an appeal by a defendant claiming police ignored his request for a lawyer.
The 'Do Not Flush' fight provides a perfect case study in arbitrary regulation and government incompetence.
Although SCOTUS says otherwise, trying Jeronimo Yanez again for the same shooting would effectively be double jeopardy.
A man who faced federal distribution charges argued the state's possession prosecution was double jeopardy.
He gave them a password, but police say it doesn't work.
The SCOTUS nominee plumbs the peculiarities of prohibition in cases involving imitation pot and medical marijuana.
Justice Dept. threatens intervention to stop unconstituional 'investigative holds.'
Amid debate over encryption access, feds try to just sneak right through.
New Jersey state troopers said declining to answer a question is a crime.
Unlike passcodes, judges seem willing to force cooperation with authorities for access.
You'd think our constitutional expert of a president would have a better grasp of 'due process.'
Something else Donald Trump and Democrats have in common
The billionaire developer's broad view of eminent domain is good for him but bad for property rights.
The Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause now protects you from government programs that steal your food.
The implications reach far beyond just raisins.
California just decided your silence sounds awfully guilty.
Not when it's a cop of course lol
Prosecutors disarm defendants by freezing their assets.
Pleaded the Fifth rather than answer state legislative committee questions
Defendant argued Fifth Amendment violation for being forced to submit to mental health testing
How prosecutors disarm defendants by freezing their assets
James Holmes wasn't read his rights for two hours after capture
Usual suspects worried
Claiming Fifth Amendment was violated
Had become a Fifth Amendment showdown
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10