Josh Hawley Wants the Government To Silence A.I.
The Missouri senator is once again pursuing misguided tech regulation.
The Missouri senator is once again pursuing misguided tech regulation.
Could the Court treat Justice Powell's Bakke opinion the way it treated Justice Kennedy's Rapanos opinion?
You're 2,200 times more likely to die when traveling by car as opposed to by airplane.
a sub silentio invocation of the general law and positive law approaches
A bill that would expand wine sales in the Empire State is meeting familiar resistance from entrenched interests.
How online “child protection” measures could make child and adult internet users more vulnerable to hackers, identity thieves, and snoops.
Even taking all the money from every billionaire wouldn't cover our coming bankruptcy.
Plus: SCOTUS won't hear Reddit sex trafficking case, debt deal would increase spending on SNAP benefits, and more...
Justice Breyer did not always vote with the Court’s strict-separationist justices. Good for him.
The certificates must "attest[] either that no portion of the filing was drafted by generative artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Bard) or that any language drafted by generative artificial intelligence was checked for accuracy, using print reporters or traditional legal databases, by a human being."
A more flexible model of oversight avoids hyper-cautious top-down regulation and enables swifter access to the substantial benefits of safe A.I.
But a lot of Republicans probably will.
Plus: A listener question cross-examines prior Reason Roundtable discussions surrounding immigration, economic growth, and birthrates.
Eric Parsa died after police placed him in a "prone position" for over nine minutes. Now, the DOJ says that the officers' actions likely violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
DeSantis calls the bill a "jailbreak," a gross misrepresentation of the criminal justice reform bill.
Plus: Artificial intelligence and jobs, how government caused a lifeguard shortage, and more...
Even without writing majority opinions, his contributions were important.
The deal will freeze non-military discretionary spending this year and allow a 1 percent increase in 2024.
Staffing shortages and laughably out-of-date technology in the federal government's air traffic control system are leading to a lot more flight delays.
Brianna Grier was having a mental health crisis. She needed an ambulance. She got two cops instead.
A Reason investigation earlier this year detailed the case of a Minnesota woman who was sentenced to 40 years on probation for a drug crime.
The stunt comes days after Justice Gorsuch warned of officials addicted to emergency decrees.
Thanks to Sackett v. EPA, the feds can no longer treat a backyard puddle like it's a lake.
C. Boyden Gray was a pivotal figure within the Republican Party on environmental law.
The Clean Water Act decision was a unanimous win for the Sacketts, and a 5-4 victory for Justice Scalia's 2006 Rapanos v. United States plurality.
A House-approved bill that the president supports would expand the draconian penalties he supposedly wants to abolish.
"The taxpayer must render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, but no more," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.
"[W]e find no error by the trial court in finding that Father had mentally abused N. The circuit court concluded that N. was 'frightened,' 'scared,' and 'fearful' of his Father's anger and his Father's refusal to accept his sexual orientation."
The U.S. tax system is extremely progressive, even compared to European countries—whose governments rely on taxing the middle class.
If the FTC wants to know why there's such a notable lack of competition within America's baby formula market, it ought to ask other parts of the federal bureaucracy.
The Securities & Exchange Commission again delays issuing a controversial anticipated rule.
Plus: Lawsuits over drag shows, a ban on Chinese citizens buying property in Florida, and more...
Arizona was set to legalize the sale of "potentially hazardous" homemade foods—but then Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed the bill.
Sometimes he calls for freedom, and sometimes he preaches something darker.
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights a vital lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic.
A case stemming from a "Holocaust revisionist's" expulsion from a conference on "Mennonites and the Holocaust."
Plus: A listener asks if the Roundtable has given the arguments of those opposed to low-skilled immigration a fair hearing.
Hawley might call them "tariffs on China," but that's obvious nonsense: Tariffs are paid by Americans.
A welcome reminder that reviewing courts must judge the propriety of agency actions solely by the grounds invoked by the agency.
The debt ceiling isn’t the issue; excessive federal spending is the real problem.
Oregon liquor regulators were caught diverting prized whiskey for personal use.
The case could have long-term implications for how broadly fair use can be applied.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks