With (Judicial) Friends Like These…
The surprising recent rise in partisan, racial, and gender differences in circuit judges following earlier opinions.
The surprising recent rise in partisan, racial, and gender differences in circuit judges following earlier opinions.
Is testimony over Zoom consistent with a criminal defendant's Constitutional rights?
Congress' end-of-year rush to fund the federal government has become the norm.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
"What I saw today was heartbreaking," said the victim's mother. "It was disturbing, it was traumatic. My son was tortured."
The case hinges on the claim that the former president tried to cover up a campaign finance violation with which he was never charged.
A nominee's work defending a state parental-notification law in 2005 may be a stumbling block to his confirmation.
The Court's newest justice questions whether her colleagues are too quick to vacate lower court decisions.
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive COVID-19 responses.
Did the Court misunderstand its "adequate and independent state ground" doctrine?
H.B. 4736 would punish foreigners who are, in many cases, deliberately building lives far away from their repressive countries.
The Oregon DMV knew about the problem, but it "wasn't at a high enough level to understand the urgency" of the need to fix it.
The charge is the crime of illegal kidnapping and deportation of Ukrainian children.
Lawyers representing an allegedly duped Buffalo Wild Wings customer demand that the company disgorge its ill-gotten gains.
People panicked in the 1980s that Japan's economic largesse posed a grave threat to American interests. Then the market reined it in.
Legal scholar Ilan Wurman argues the controversial doctrine is justifiable on textualist and linguistic grounds.
Plus: Another campus free speech debacle, foreign cheese groups lose Gruyere trademark case, and more...
Opponents of the reforms favored by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition should acknowledge the threat posed by unconstrained majority rule.
The Constitution was intended to preserve state sovereignty, not create an all-powerful central government.
"Plaintiff's allegations of political retaliation and torture are highly concerning. Nevertheless, this Court is bound by jurisdictional limits and grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction."
All officers and employees of the unit would “have immunity from criminal and civil liability” for performing the activities authorized by H.B. 20.
The bill now bans a battery of poorly-defined "Critical Theory" concepts, and prevents schools from funding programs that promote "diversity, equity, and inclusion."
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
Youth employment is a recognized path to greater prosperity.
The president wants to redefine federally licensed gun dealers in service of an ineffective anti-crime strategy.
It argues for increasing the number of cases in the Supreme Court's "Hall of Shame" and proposes three worthy additions.
"I know either way he will use it against me.... And after the fact, I know he will try to act like he has some right to the decision," said the woman in text messages to her friends named as defendants in the suit.
There's little reason to believe that any of the tactics Republican politicians are proposing would be effective in keeping fentanyl out of the country.
Plus: The editors recommend the best books for sparking interest in free market principles.
Under the Kelo v. New London Supreme Court decision, a state can take private land to give to a private developer for almost any reason it wants.
The law allows abortions when there is a "medical emergency"—but what qualifies as an emergency?
Despite his declared commitment to freedom and fiscal conservatism, DeSantis' immigration policies represent a dramatic expansion of government power and spending.
During the recent multiday battle over the next speaker of the House, media outlets were free to capture Congress members negotiating, debating, and even losing their cool.
"It's not clear that FTX would have existed, at least at its scale, if we had domestic guidelines for American companies," the former senator tells Reason.
"I hurt every day," said the victim's mother. "I cry all day, every day."
Yet another court decision stopping a U.C. Berkeley housing project is getting California's policy makers to think bigger about reforming the infamous California Environmental Quality Act.
Somehow a district court has made erroneous rulings three times in one case, and still has not reached the merits.
The Institute for Justice says Robert Reeves' First Amendment rights were violated when prosecutors filed and refiled baseless felony charges against him after he sued to get his car back.
Members of Congress showed their true colors at a Thursday hearing.
Handouts for tourist-trap museums will be part of the federal funding battleground in the next two years.
What we did for Ukrainians, we could do for other migrants too.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10