How 9/11 Remade American Immigration
Twenty-five years after the attacks, control and distrust rule the institutions that process foreigners who travel or immigrate to the United States.
Twenty-five years after the attacks, control and distrust rule the institutions that process foreigners who travel or immigrate to the United States.
The panic is pretty silly, since these facilities are necessary to power industries that power our economy and fund state budgets.
The Court rightly ruled the executive branch has no authority to restrict mail-in voting.
Given the Second Amendment's history, several briefs argue, a gun's suitability for militia service suggests Americans have a right to possess it.
Plus: Data center backlash, Anthropic job-loss predictions, and more...
Unwise policies are not always unlawful policies.
The brief explains why the Section 122 tariffs are illegal and run afoul of the major questions and nondelegation doctrines.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Taylor Rogers didn't show that it was clearly established that it was excessive force to be held down on a pile of fire ants while handcuffed.
"Alienation of affection" actions like the one Sinema is facing undermine the idea that adults have agency in their romantic and sexual choices.
It seeks to usurp state and congressional power over election administration.
Meanwhile, the top court of Massachusetts considers whether the state can deny carry permits to applicants who are deemed "unsuitable."
In November, we will learn whether Buckeye Republicans have been sufficiently persuaded by a more tolerant vision of the fusion of faith and freedom.
The unusual victory arises from a connection to the Contracts Clause.
The agreement follows a 9th Circuit ruling that the University of Washington violated Stuart Reges' First Amendment rights by treating his dissent as intolerable "disruption."
Olympus Spa—an all-female, nude establishment in Washington state—sued after the government said it had broken the law by refusing to accept a preoperative transgender woman. But the case is more complicated than it looks.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a pair of cases involving rifle restrictions imposed by Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois.
This tort, which lets people sue their spouses' lovers for interfering with the marriage, is litigated in about 150 new cases per year in North Carolina.
By labeling this group a terrorist organization, the state is chilling more than Muslims' freedom of expression.
A new campaign by the Cato Institute aims to educate jurors on their right to vote their conscience against unjust laws and sentences.
In the court of public opinion, there is little room for ambiguity here. But those who watched the trial know that reality is far less satisfying.
Training a model on copyrighted work is the same transformative use exception that protects The New York Times' journalism.
Some Democrats are licking their chops over other economic powers that Trump has claimed for the presidency.
D.C.’s highest court strikes Deutsche Bank’s appellate brief as a sanction.
Despite carrying a REAL ID, Leo Garcia Venegas has been repeatedly detained by immigration agents. Now he’s suing to block immigration raids targeting Latinos on private construction sites.
The bipartisan bill, which passed the House, takes aim at university boycotts of any “major strategic partner.”
The chief justice finds himself in dissent in his latest showdown with the president.
The government also placed Karyann Parkinson on its child abuse and neglect registry, where she will remain for seven years.
By unilaterally razing and replacing the East Wing, the president again shows his disregard for the rule of law and the separation of powers.
The proposed GRANITE Act looks to shield U.S. companies from foreign censorship orders.
The majority didn't decide whether the construction violated federal law, only that plaintiffs' purely aesthetic interests didn't allow them to assert a federal claim.
A SCOTUS petition argues that the practice, which allows a judicial finding of dangerousness based on a preponderance of the evidence, violates the Fifth Amendment.
Trump threatened the Center for American Progress with a defamation lawsuit, while Jason Watson faces a court martial for offending the president.
Trump administration officials didn’t try to hide that they were punishing the company for its views.
Americans are starting to recognize the dangers of pervasive surveillance by automated license plate readers.
The Safer GAMING Act would silence minors in every online game by default—and violate the First Amendment.
Musk's X Corp., along with other social media companies operating in the state, must disclose whether and how it defines hate speech and disinformation.
Pension changes passed in 2011 have saved California taxpayers from a fiscal crisis, but public sector unions are now pushing to undo them.
Florida police departments have been adding drones, facial recognition technology, and license plate readers to their arsenals for years.
And both are hiding behind a lie of omission.
The conservative justice is sticking around on the Supreme Court. Will conservatives come to regret it?
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.