Justice Pat DeWine on Interpreting the Ohio Constitution
A forthcoming paper from a Justice on the Ohio Supreme Court on constitutional interpretation in Ohio.
A forthcoming paper from a Justice on the Ohio Supreme Court on constitutional interpretation in Ohio.
"Invoking the innocence of children is not...a magic incantation sufficient for legislatures to run roughshod over the First Amendment rights of adults."
Media hysteria and overzealous governments have led many to believe that childhood independence is a form of abuse.
The Treasury's sweeping rule curtailing dual-use technology transactions with Chinese firms will reduce domestic growth, innovation, and security.
Harris' plan to extend at-home care to Medicare recipients is yet another example of wasteful spending.
Kate Barr is running for state senate in North Carolina, hoping to raise awareness about the effects of gerrymandering.
The state's powerful coastal land-use regulator is arguing its awesome development-stopping powers applies to rocket launches as well as housing.
"Plaintiff's allegations are emotionally and politically charged, and ... Plaintiff is a member of certain groups subject to discrimination. That, however, is true of a plethora of cases in the federal courts and has generally not been understood to authorize anonymous pleading."
AFIP is an "unnecessary bureaucracy" that stifles economic freedom, says Milei's government.
The court concludes that X's requested discovery is broader than necessary, though it leaves open the door to some considerably narrower discovery.
Geothermal projects promise nearly limitless energy, but they are being stymied by environmental policies.
The National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration is holding vehicles to higher standards than it does drivers.
With today's cert grants, the Court now has four cases that address the issue of where suits can be filed against federal agencies and who can file them.
As with Biden, you can count on Harris to expand government programs.
Another interesting aside in the Royal Canin oral argument.
An amusing and potentially revealing exchange in a recent oral argument.
Drew Johnson wants to help define the post-Trump GOP.
The state has been demanding that TV stations remove political ads in support of a reproductive freedom amendment on the ballot this year.
As technology develops, we anticipate the use of LLM AI tools to augment corpus linguistic analysis of ordinary meaning—without outsourcing the ultimate task of legal interpretation.
Healthcare promises always come with high costs.
It appears that a majority of judges on the D.C. Circuit believe it should be easier to seek judicial review of Federal Elections Commission non-enforcement decisions.
As it stands, the program effectively redistributes money from younger and poorer people to richer people.
Some were surprised by the Supreme Court's action, but they should not have been.
British law allows local governments to enact absurdly censorious orders limiting "anti-social" behavior.
The selling points of LLM AIs are insufficient; corpus tools hold the advantage.
Legal scholar Michael Ramsey points out another way courts could reject Trump's plan to use the act as a tool for peacetime mass deportation.
Due to North Carolina's lack of an anti-SLAPP law, the defendants will have to defend themselves in court.
"[C]ounsel has an affirmative duty to disclose the use of artificial intelligence and the evidence sought to be admitted should properly be subject to a Frye hearing prior to its admission ...."
LLM AIs are too susceptible to manipulation—and too prone to inconsistency—to be viewed as reliable means of producing empirical evidence of ordinary meaning.
These policies may sound good on paper—but they would be disastrous in reality.
Plaintiff had argued that defendants' publicizing the religious court's statement "serves as a form of social pressure, calling on the community to shun or ostracize the individual until they comply with the court's demands."
Despite homelessness being on the rise, local governments keep cracking down on efforts to shelter those without permanent housing.
Plus: FEMA threat-related arrest, incentives for babymaking, "men" for Harris/Walz, and more...
Our draft article shows that corpus linguistics delivers where LLM AI tools fall short—in producing nuanced linguistic data instead of bare, artificial conclusions.
How U.S. presidents habitually use—and abuse—pronouns to deceive.
As we show in a draft article, corpus linguistic tools have been shown to do what LLM AIs cannot—produce transparent, replicable evidence of how a word or phrase is ordinarily used by the public.
Few problems can be resolved by grandstanding politicians threatening new penalties.
The plan is illegal. But courts might refuse to strike it down based on the "political questions" doctrine.
Can't Americans all just get along? Maybe we can't—and perhaps we shouldn't have to.
Americans are turning to home-cooked meals, but state regulators are making it harder for small food businesses to survive.
Mason Murphy says Officer Michael Schmitt violated his rights by punishing him for constitutionally protected speech.
It's fundamentally different from what Republicans have tried to do, but similar enough to be worrisome.
The court found scientific opinion about "shaken baby syndrome" has changed, and a man sentenced to 35 years in prison deserves a new trial.
A successful appointments clause challenge to Regional Fishery Management Councils. (Updated to fix block quotes)
Remembering the first time a partisan Senate minority blocked a judicial nomination that enjoyed majority support.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10