Julian Assange's Freedom Came at a Steep Price
Assange's plea deal sets a threatening precedent for free speech and journalism.
Assange's plea deal sets a threatening precedent for free speech and journalism.
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
The decision reverses the Court's previous stay of a lower court decision blocking part of the law.
The state cut down private fruit trees and offered gift cards as compensation. It didn't solve the citrus canker problem.
The candidate who grasps the gravity of this situation and proposes concrete steps to address it will demonstrate the leadership our nation now desperately needs. The stakes couldn't be higher.
Even if one thinks the federal government crossed the line in pushing more aggressive social-media-platform content moderation policies, plaintiffs must still satisfy the traditional requirements of Article III standing.
The candidate makes the case against the two-party system.
Thanks to the lengthy approval process and special interests surrounding environmental review, it takes far longer to build anything in the United States than in other developed countries.
Although critics say the Court’s current approach is unworkable, it has been undeniably effective at defeating constitutionally dubious gun regulations.
Ending U.S. aid would give Washington less leverage in the Middle East. That's why it's worth doing.
There is a great deal of panic surrounding the "extreme" nature of the current Court. But that is often not based in reality.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors has endorsed "heartland visas," which would create a pathway for skilled immigrants to settle in stagnating communities.
The case hinged upon the idea of what a publicly funded school can teach. But parents do have a role to play in that conversation.
Of the 21 Texas House Republicans who joined Democrats to kill school choice during the special sessions, only seven survived their primaries.
The Court's grant of certiorari is limited to only one of the issues in this litigation.
Both rulings were by Democratic-appointed judges - a result that bodes ill for the plan's future.
Plus: A listener asks if there are any libertarian solutions to rising obesity rates.
The agency's inscrutable approach to harm-reducing nicotine products sacrifices consumer choice and public health on the altar of youth protection.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion includes significant errors, and violates some of her own precepts against excessive reliance on questionable history.
The state has thousands of unauthorized shops but fewer than 200 licensed marijuana sellers.
Pastor Joshua Robertson stepped up when his community asked for support. His efforts have more people realizing that there is an alternative to the failing school system.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
Previously you had to hit the animal yourself during hunting season to claim the carcass.
DeSantis' chief of staff used a personal phone to coordinate migrant flights to Martha's Vineyard. Now DeSantis' lawyers say those phone logs should be secret.
Upcoming legislation would repeal parts of the 1873 law that could be used to target abortion, but the Comstock Act's reach is much more broad than that.
The justices are rushing to close out the term before the end of June.
The bill would banish insurance companies from the state if they invest in companies profiting from oil and gas.
The Biden administration says its new guidance will make pandemic research safer. Critics say it suffers the same flaws as past, failed gain-of-function regulations.
A handful of Republican lawmakers worked with Democrats to repeal an 1864 law banning most abortions.
Chevron deference, a doctrine created by the Court in 1984, gives federal agencies wide latitude in interpreting the meaning of various laws. But the justices may overturn that.
X's child porn detection system doesn’t violate an Illinois biometric privacy law, the judge ruled.
We could grow our way out of our debt burden if politicians would limit spending increases to just below America's average yearly economic growth. But they won't even do that.
The case hinged on the ATF’s statutory authority, not the Second Amendment.
Whatever you think of abortion, the Department of Justice's latest approach to these cases is misguided.
There is a growing movement to let churches and other religious organizations build housing on their property that would otherwise be banned by zoning regulations.
It's a good policy, authorized by the law. But it will likely face lawsuits, nonetheless, potentially leading to a prolonged legal battle.
Issuing a posthumous pardon for Bennett would reaffirm our nation’s commitment to free expression and intellectual freedom.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about the Selective Service.
The blanket pardon is one of the largest yet, and another sign of the collapse of public support for marijuana prohibition.
It often takes almost a year or more to get public records from the federal government. Here are some things you can do while you wait.
Does America really need a National Strategic Dad Jokes Reserve?
The Selective Service should be abolished, not made more efficient and equitable.
There may not be a perfect solution to ending homelessness, but there are some clear principles to reduce the friction for those working to do so.
The court concludes states are likely to succeed in their procedural challenges to the Education Department's decision to extend Bostock to Title IX.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10