The Durham Report Is Right About the Need for More FBI Oversight
The FBI's sloppy, secret search warrants should be a concern for all Americans.
The FBI's sloppy, secret search warrants should be a concern for all Americans.
From Russiagate to COVID discourse, elites in government and the media are trying to control and centralize free speech and open inquiry.
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of Jacob Siegel's broadside against the "counter-disinformation complex" in Tablet magazine.
An expanded surveillance state can’t solve problems created by drug prohibition.
The feds invoke national security to take away more of your rights and pretend they're keeping you safe.
Never underestimate officials’ ability to turn embarrassing moments into awful opportunities.
'Digidog is out of the pound," New York City Mayor Eric Adams declared, not ominously.
The Bottoms Up and the Devil Laughs author and former Reason staffer reports back from post-privacy America.
Plus: the terrible case for pausing A.I. innovation
Is an A.I. "foom" even possible?
Plus: Senate Republicans spar over TikTok and free speech, Americans can't agree on how to cut spending, and more...
Plus: States consider mandatory anti-porn filters, tariffs create baby formula shortages (again), and more...
As the government sets its sights on migrants crossing the border, native-born Americans have also come under its watchful eye.
Our mobile devices constantly snitch on our whereabouts.
Plus: More lawmakers move to decriminalize psychedelic plants, Tennessee's "adult cabaret" law, and more...
Politicians lean on the financial industry to target activities they don’t like.
Officials shield government abuses from litigation by claiming “national security.” The Supreme Court declined to weigh in.
The government is refining its ability to track your movements with little discussion.
Plus: States move to curtail internet anonymity, Amsterdam cracks down on cannabis, sex, and booze, and more...
These days, he may run for president. His politics have changed.
Plus: The French face "le wokisme," a Tennessee "eyelash specialist license" would require 300 hours education, and more...
They both share in their authoritarian desires to censor online speech and violate citizen privacy.
Thousands of local, state, and federal law-enforcers have access to sensitive financial data.
Eliminating privacy in schools would be a disaster for academic freedom and social development.
An op-ed in The New York Times tries to make the case that the Chinese Communist Party is a worthy partner in raising children.
Part of a law that authorizes warrantless snooping is about to expire, opening up a opportunity to better protect our privacy rights.
Intelligence-gathering “fusion centers” repeatedly abuse civil liberties without making us safer.
Plus: Still no House speaker, the gender gap in college scholarships, Meta fined $414 million, and more...
The first FBI director wasn't all bad (or a cross-dresser). But he and the agency he created regularly flouted constitutional limits on power.
The first FBI director wasn't a cross-dresser, says a new biography, but he was often quick to flout constitutional limits on state power.
A surveillance state is no less tyrannical when the snoops really believe it's for your own protection.
The director worries that the public doesn't trust his spy agency.
Once the government has an excuse to electronically track everywhere you've been and everyone you've been near, abuses are predictable.
Kelly Conlon's bizarre experience gives a glimpse into a future with omnipresent facial recognition systems.
Senator Warren wants to extend the financial surveillance state cooked up by drug warriors and anti-terrorism fearmongers to cryptocurrencies.
Report: “Half of democratic governments around the world are in decline.”
The long-term economic and social impacts of zero-COVID can't be reversed as easily.
Photos and information you store on iCloud will be safer from hackers, spies, and the government.
The San Francisco Police Department assured the public it had "no plans to arm robots with guns." But assurances aren't guarantees.
A precedent set in the January 6 prosecutions could be dangerous to the public.
How a Prohibition-era legal precedent allows warrantless surveillance on private property.
This surveillance would be unconstitutional—and there’s no reason to believe it will make anyone safer.
The Atlas of Surveillance lets us monitor the agencies that snoop on the public.
The bill would amp up surveillance while doing little to actually protect anyone.
The CCP’s tyranny extends even to U.S. college campuses, where Chinese and Taiwanese students fear censorship.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10