Feds Used a Secret Database to Track Journalists Covering the Migrant Caravan: Reason Roundup
Plus: Facebook says it's pivoting to privacy, and congressional Democrats want to "save the internet."
Plus: Facebook says it's pivoting to privacy, and congressional Democrats want to "save the internet."
For years, security state advocates fought to maintain the authority to snoop on your phone records. Are they really giving up?
A cashless society is a monitored (and potentially controlled) society.
Paul cited Barr's past support for warrantless surveillance. He's right to be worried.
The latest in London Mayor Sadiq Khan's war on knife ownership.
Good intentions, private fears, and innovative entrepreneurs vying for government contracts are killing privacy in public places.
Elizabeth Nolan Brown talks about DHS's "Blue Campaign," which is pushing hotel and airline workers to call the feds if they suspect human trafficking.
It's a good idea that libertarians should applaud.
The possibilities and perils of voluntary, privately operated biometric screening
Hacking tools end up in the hands of some dangerous people. So, apparently, do our government hackers.
Compelled use of facial and finger recognition features runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment.
Among other things, it would call for investigators to review three years' worth of a would-be gun buyer's social media postings for "excessive discriminatory content."
Your new national ID is hacker-bait that complicates journeys but won't make you any safer.
On Monday, a federal appeals court considered Grindr's guilt in a case involving app-based impersonators.
Santa Claus is coming to town with all his liquids in a single quart-sized baggie.
The tech giant actually stands to gain by legally hamstringing competition with tough regulations.
Air marshals might still treat you like a terrorist. But they'll stop documenting your every move.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Equal Justice Society, and others are challenging the practice in court.
Australians who want to protect their data from surveillance now need to turn to extra-legal means.
Parliament passes a bill at the last possible moment to give officials the power to weaken encryption.
It's been dubbed "NYC's Anti-Airdrop Dick Pic Law," but the bill is much broader than that.
Tech companies are compiling incredibly detailed dossiers about you.
Cases in which a majority of the Court fell down on the job.
But what does that mean? Readers, tell me what you think, and how it fits with your general theory of constitutional interpretation (e.g., textualism, originalism, etc.).
The Supreme Court's call for supplemental briefing in Frank v. Gaos will lead it to a difficult question.
A decade of surveillance from the civil rights era makes a technology and social-media-fueled return.
Facebook, Twitter, and other mainstream social networks have their issues. Are these 5 platforms viable alternatives?
When genetic testing results become a tool for law enforcement
Civil liberties lawyers worry that sensitive documents could end up in the wrong hands.
In New Zealand, customs officials can now demand that travelers unlock their electronic devices.
U.K. government officials insisted they didn't collect and store communications data of Privacy International. Turns out they did.
The PATRIOT Act fell out of fashion-but swap "human trafficker" for "terrorist" and let the civil liberties infringements roll!
There are lots of reasons to be concerned about government snooping, but how should we feel when private companies do it?
Since his whistleblowing, the United Kingdom has granted itself even more power to snoop on citizens.
Bill also calls for holding forum moderators legally liable for extreme speech.
Draft legislation would force tech companies to compromise encryption at the government's demand.
Thanks to a design bug in a government transparency website, dozens of social security numbers were mistakenly made public.
An interesting case now being litigated in federal court in Wisconsin.
From a lawyer's letter demanding that a story about a now-expunged arrest be expunged from a newspaper as well as from the government records-but the law, fortunately, does not support this argument.
The ACLU stunt is intended to warn against using tech to identify suspects.
Tenants are challenging a HUD rule that requires local public housing authorities across the country to prohibit people from smoking in their homes.
Entrapment prosecution of bitcoin exchangers highlights government's war on privacy.
The Kentucky Republican is worried about Kavanaugh's record on the Fourth Amendment.
The USA Freedom Act was supposed to reduce unwarranted access to our personal data. That's not what happened.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10