Duty to Retreat and Duty to Comply with Demands
If you support the duty to retreat (before using deadly force), what do you think of the duty to "comply[] with a demand ... [to] abstain from performing an act"?
If you support the duty to retreat (before using deadly force), what do you think of the duty to "comply[] with a demand ... [to] abstain from performing an act"?
Plus: U.S. approves sanctions on Myanmar's state-run businesses, Howard University dissolves its classics department, and more...
Most victims of police misconduct never get to take their cases to court.
A 2018 Supreme Court decision was supposed to protect your location data from federal snooping. That’s not what happened.
If small arms can’t defeat a modern military, why are the people of Myanmar so determined to fight for freedom?
But what exactly do these terms mean?
By invoking the magic of good intentions, the Times justifies the U.S. acting like Russia and China.
Judge Stephanos Bibas "does not see how" he can follow the plurality opinion
An interesting conversation I had with UMass law professor (and associate dean) Shaun Spencer, organized by the UMass Law Federalist Society.
Now 14 states have legislation explicitly protecting free speech on campus.
From protests to the coronavirus, it thinks it can protect you from anything.
Although police seized the perpetrator's shotgun when he was deemed suicidal, he was never identified as a potential murderer.
"The notion that a school can discipline a student for that kind of...non-harassing expression is contrary to our First Amendment tradition."
Unsurprisingly, the court also refuses to order private caselaw repositories and search engines to hide the information.
Both advocates and skeptics of the copycat theory recommend self-restraint by the news media.
Among other things, it calls for online censorship to shield identities of public officials and lets the governor control city police budgets.
Documentary short Do Not Split draws the ire of Beijing.
Plus: Clarity on Adam Toledo's death, Big Tech antitrust bill approved by House Democrats, and more...
Pacira Biosciences' redacted brief supporting the motion for the preliminary injunction is now available—but it says nothing about the First Amendment, or about how the injunction could escape the prior restraint doctrine.
Remember when Republicans believed private businesses had a right to exercise free speech?
Pacira Biosciences, Inc. is suing over allegedly "false and misleading statements made about EXPAREL, a pain medication drug."
if it's used as an attempt to get a settlement, the Ninth Circuit rules .
A ban won’t stop mass shootings, but it will hinder self-defense.
Leveling that grave accusation at every aspect of American life will produce disengagement, alienation, and reaction.
Conservative state legislators are taking a page from the playbook of pro-immigration activists and the marijuana legalization movement.
Plus: Legal battle over published arrest records, senators introduce cruise ship legislation, and more...
The 9-7 en banc ruling appears to rest on the ban applying on to doctors who know the woman's reason; women could apparently still get such abortions if they don't disclose the reason.
The mandatory online training requires users to select the “right” speech before they finish.
"Terror and dread fill academic workers, professors, and staff alike, and it is everywhere."
A police officer pulled the trigger. But Wright shouldn't have been pulled over in the first place.
The president is picking fights with much of the population and further dividing the country.
Plus: GOP gender policing in North Carolina, marijuana legalization mistakes, and more...
The surveillance state is available as a plug-and-play solution for any cop interested in a free trial period.
It all depends on where you are.
The president's unilateral restrictions are legally dubious and unlikely to "save lives."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10