University Official Fired for Discriminating Against Police Chief Who Voted for Trump
The official was the Vice President for Student Affairs and Diversity at the University of North Dakota.
The official was the Vice President for Student Affairs and Diversity at the University of North Dakota.
Are universities supposed to have institutional views on the facts about self-defense in a case half a continent way?
We talk about blogging, social media and free speech, the Religion Clauses, and federalism and individual rights.
The newspaper wrongly implies that press freedom is limited to "real" journalists.
The American Civil Liberties Union should not cavalierly take the side of prosecutors against the concept of self-defense.
The trial became an upside-down microcosm for the polarized debates about the U.S. criminal justice system.
British political scientist David Runciman says the answer is "yes." And he makes a stronger case than you might think.
This stop was a Fourth Amendment violation, holds a federal court.
“UNOS’s reasoning boils down to a desire to keep indiscreet communications out of the public eye, which is not enough to satisfy our standard for good cause.”
From leading liberal constitutional law professor Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), in the Chronicle of Higher Education.
Why trust an agency that conceals information from judges but prosecutes us for lying to it?
"Representatives of a public entity taking the opportunity to squelch plaintiffs' views as apostasy"; the squelching was partly based on claims that certain remarks are "abusive and coded in racist terms, also known as 'dog whistles,'" and that "comments about the District's equity survey" were "'irrelevant' to the meeting agenda item of the District's equity policy."
A surveillance case will determine whether officials can be sued for "national security" rights violations.
A delayed, but hopefully still helpful final rejoinder to Stephen Sachs.
And now an appeals court has ruled the cops who arrested her aren't entitled to qualified immunity from her lawsuit.
Plus: Yale University faces an interesting lawsuit, the ACLU takes a stance on student loan debt, and more...
Defendant had posted three photos to Instagram showing (1) a movie ticket, (2) ammunition, and (3) the inside of a theater, and also one to Snapchat showing (4) a handgun.
Would the outcome in Dobbs put originalism in doubt?
Amar: The Yale Law School administration has been "dilatory, duplicitous, disingenuous, downright deplorable."
Soviet rule promised abundance. Instead it brought misery and starvation.
Fanta Bility's death has revived an under-the-radar debate about the doctrine of transferred intent.
Appalling that an American university, which had publicly committed itself to free expression, would thus censor criticism of a foreign government (whether China, Israel, or any other).
The court takes a narrow view of 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1), but rejects liability as a matter of state law: “public policy [with regard to how gun sales can be arranged] is more properly determined by the peoples’ elected representatives rather than by the courts.”
Sen. Amy Klobuchar wants to put HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, the former California attorney general with a reputation for being a partisan hack, in charge of "health disinformation" online.
When should rap lyrics (or other works) be admissible as evidence on the theory that they reflect real events?
Despite a tragic on-set death, there is no need to involve police officers in still more aspects of people's lives.
Plus: Consumer prices surge, a Virginia school district talks openly about burning books, and more...
Judge Bruce Schroeder rightly reprimanded Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger for what he called a "grave constitutional violation."
Misinformation and bad policy can only be defeated by robust, open debate in the public square.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks