Illegal Immigration Isn't an 'Invasion'
Overheated rhetoric is a ploy to treat migrants like enemy combatants.
Overheated rhetoric is a ploy to treat migrants like enemy combatants.
The Third Amendment Lawyers Association argues in a recent amicus brief that the federal eviction ban requires landlords to quarter soldiers.
Plus: Wiretapping social media, Democrats' budget proposal, cryptocurrency regulations, the infrastructure bill, and more..
Fourth Circuit overturns laws barring licensed gun dealers from selling handguns to 18–20-year-olds.
“The fact that it hasn't ended in the past 230 years suggests that maybe [it will] last a good deal longer,” says historian Dennis C. Rasmussen, author of Fears of a Setting Sun: The Disillusionment of America's Founders
We can thank judges who were prepared to enforce constitutional limits on public health powers.
The controversial 2005 case "strayed from the Constitution," say Thomas and Gorsuch.
Holding a sign in a public park should not cause an arrest.
A new lawsuit challenges Minnesota's law requiring a person be at least 21 years old to carry a handgun.
A new conservative faction embraces "authoritative rule for the common good."
No, states can't use the 10th Amendment to overturn the First Amendment.
Police were finally able to catch the serial killer using DNA genealogy databases—violating many innocent people's constitutional right to privacy.
Revived federalism is a start, but it doesn’t go far enough.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments next term in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett.
Conservative state legislators are taking a page from the playbook of pro-immigration activists and the marijuana legalization movement.
The Founders could not have possibly imagined the Commerce Clause covering an eviction moratorium.
Plus: Wisconsin may approve microschools, what will Biden Title IX guidance look like, and more...
Texas state senators introduced a bill requiring the national anthem at all pro sports events.
Plus: A new documentary tells Reality Winner's story, occupational licensing reform is antitrust reform, and more...
Plus: Problems with the PRO Act, what libertarian feminism isn't, and more...
All professions deserve the same constitutional protections that speech-heavy industries get.
There are plausible arguments on both sides of the debate.
They also argue that the Senate has no authority to try a former president.
On the inconsistency between choice of law cases and interstate sovereign immunity cases
While many prominent constitutional scholars think trying a former president is perfectly legal, the dissenters make some points that are worth considering.
My recently published article on the NCC project outlines several important areas of agreement between conservative, libertarian, and progressive participants.
History and precedent both support impeachment trials for former federal officials.
Trump deserves to be remembered for what his words and actions have shown him to be.
Louis Gohmert asserts a previously overlooked power to decide which electoral votes will be counted.
That’s a rare position for modern White House residents, and not necessarily a popular one with the public.
A new book explicates the escaped slave and renowned orator's argument that the Constitution is "a glorious liberty document" that justified ending slavery.
Trump’s judicial humiliation is now complete.
The Constitution “plainly makes the appointment of electors a state-by-state matter.”
The NCC put together teams of conservatives, progressives, and libertarians to propose their own rewrites of the Constitution. All three teams came up with interesting ideas - and with some notable areas of agreement.
The escaped slave called the Constitution "a glorious liberty document" that justified extending equality to blacks and women.
Plus: Congress to vote today on marijuana decriminalization, new study shows bad news for indoor diners, and more...
One Ilya reviews a book written by another. Hopefully, this won't exacerbate #IlyaConfusion!
Is this the Supreme Court’s next big gun rights case?
Richard Epstein vs. Lawrence Lessig
Law professors Richard Epstein and Lawrence Lessig go head-to-head.
The Supreme Court nominee weighs in on a famous case.
Perhaps Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David Wecht ought to read more history, starting with the speeches of the late Rep. John Bingham.
Reviewing the record of the SCOTUS shortlister.
The restrictions imagined by Republicans in 2016 or by Democrats now are nothing but self-serving nonsense.
The National Apartment Association has joined a lawsuit brought by four individual landlords arguing the CDC's nationwide eviction moratorium is both illegal and unconstitutional.
“The Constitution sets certain lines that may not be crossed, even in an emergency.”
I coauthored it with Harvard Law School Professor Randall Kennedy.
This year's annual confab is remote, but will still feature the annual B. Kenneth Simon Lecture and release of the Cato Supreme Court Review.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10