Democrats Unveil Policing Reform Bill
The bill includes many items on police reformers' wishlists, but it would also pump more federal money to police departments instead of shrinking their budgets.
The bill includes many items on police reformers' wishlists, but it would also pump more federal money to police departments instead of shrinking their budgets.
In it I explain how to reform a federal law the Supreme Court has interpreted as giving the president nearly unlimited power to ban migrants from entering the United States.
Sometime in 2021, the American people will be presented with a reorganized and newly empowered federal public health bureaucracy. As time passes, it will grow in size and scope.
The GOP claims to be the party of freedom. If that's true, they should rethink policies that embolden bad police behavior.
The justices weigh abortion, school choice, and federal anti-discrimination law.
If Congress extends boosted temporary unemployment benefits into early 2021, nearly five out of every six beneficiaries would be earning more money by not working.
Princeton's Omar Wasow talks about the complicated effects of civil rights demonstrations, police brutality, and racial fears on public policy.
Law enforcement, on his orders, violently dispersed nearby peaceful protesters.
"Although California's guidelines place restrictions on places of worship," Roberts wrote, "those restrictions appear consistent with the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment."
Plus: the return of the "outside agitator" narrative, Trump can't designate Antifa a terror group, and more...
Do mandatory, integrated state bar associations violate the First Amendment? Two justices would like the Court to reconsider this question.
Sen. Chuck Grassley says it's dead because lawmakers feared upsetting the president.
The right's response to the coronavirus lockdowns brings out a longstanding American paradox.
Plus: unrest in Minneapolis, Twitter labels Trump tweet, and more...
It's great that Gov. Gavin Newsom is finally looking at costs and benefits. But don't kid yourself. None of it has anything to do with "science."
Weak reforms to the government’s power to secretly snoop on Americans wasn’t enough for the president. What happens next?
A flawed argument for judicial passivity in cases of government regulation.
A former Bush Administration Justice Department official responds to Judge Michael Luttig's critique of Judge Sullivan.
Sen. Wyden withdraws support for amendment due to fears it has been weakened too much.
The House will consider a surveillance reform proposal that failed in the Senate by just one vote.
A former federal judge (and Supreme Court short-lister) on what Judge Emmett Sullivan (and his critics) got right, and got wrong
The disease control agency is a poster child for bureaucratic incompetence.
The idea is not so far-fetched.
Following Georgia's ruling in favor of a lactation consultant, Pennsylvania’s high court reviews another “unreasonable” occupational licensing scheme.
A president who can attach his own new conditions to federal grants to states could use that power to undermine state autonomy on many issues - especially now that federal spending has been massively expanded during the coronavirus crisis.
The ruling says the state's top health official exceeded her statutory authority by ordering "nonessential" businesses to close.
Congress created inspectors general to be watchdogs, but it's too weak-willed to protect those watchdogs from retaliation.
A local judge has concluded the State Health Director likely exceeded her powers under the Ohio Constitution
John Baker and Robert Miller identify an alternative
Courts are beginning to recognize that public health powers, while broad, are not a blank check.
"We have long interpreted the Georgia Constitution as protecting a right to work in one's chosen profession free from unreasonable government interference."
An under-the-radar environmental lawsuit could provide the Supreme Court another opportunity to revive the nondelegation doctrine.
A new paper by Thomas Frampton suggests most recent commentary concerning the Michael Flynn prosecution gets it wrong.
In a brief exchange during a recent oral argument, the Justice suggested the Court should reconsider giving states "special solicitude" under Massachusetts v. EPA
Businesses need to be able to adjust to a world where COVID-19 remains an ongoing concern.
We submitted another strange bedfellows amicus brief on severability in the Texas ACA case.
A seemingly arcane dispute about administrative law has profound implications for the limits of public health authority.
An effort by Sen. Rand Paul to forbid warrantless investigation of citizens was soundly defeated.
The Supreme Court weighs the congressional subpoena power in Trump v. Mazars.
There is a difference between reporting facts that make the president uncomfortable and manufacturing facts to fit a preconceived view of him.
Why the Supreme Court can rule in favor of Congress in the Trump financial records cases without thereby giving Congress any unlimited power.
Do legislative subpoenas really need a limiting principle?
The new bill includes another round of stimulus checks for all Americans, funds additional coronavirus testing, and spends billions to bail out states and government agencies straining under pension debt.
There was a potentially pivotal exchange in today's Supreme Court oral argument over the House subpoenas seeking the President's financial records.
An amendment to a FISA renewal bill would let the FBI snoop on your online browser history.
Officials in six Pennsylvania counties say they will allow businesses to reopen without permission from the state government. Expect more of that.