From 9/11 to COVID, Every Emergency Means Bigger Government
We have to stop governing by emergency.
We have to stop governing by emergency.
Can’t work Zoom, will fix financial markets.
Two women still face felony charges, though the cases against all male defendants were dropped.
The lawsuit argues a 2,100-page environmental impact report for a major expansion of the University of California, San Francisco's Parnassus campus wasn't thorough enough.
This action brings to an end a period when the US was more closed off to legal immigration than at any other time in the nation's history.
The agency also missed an FBI bulletin citing "specific calls for violence."
Fewer low wage businesses also means fewer job opportunities for low wage workers.
Enhanced unemployment benefits may have helped many Americans weather the pandemic, but they've also attracted the interest of some modern-day Willie Suttons.
Thomas is right that the doctrine is a mess. But the Court may not be in any hurry to clean it up.
This misguided effort to combat "misinformation" is a brazen assault on free speech.
What to expect from Joe Biden’s pick for attorney general.
But it would continue the politicization of the means of voting and make it harder to vote.
Eliminating earmarks didn't make the government smaller. But reinstating them would facilitate legislative corruption.
Also: What we learned from impeachment.
The unfolding legal saga of City of Hayward v. Stoddard-Nunez
Does the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures include the right to be free from an unreasonable attempted seizure?
A 2000 OLC memo suggests the answer is "yes."
Presidents aren't saints. They aren't monarchs. They aren't celebrities. And they aren't your friends.
The Senate minority leader's triangulation does not bode well for the GOP's ability to stand for something other than a personality cult.
Whether the reality-show-star-turned-first-president-to-be-impeached-twice has a future in American politics, however, sadly remains an open question.
The outcome shows that it is almost impossible to convict a president in an era of severe polarization. But Trump's second impeachment still served some useful purposes..
The 33-year-old lawmaker, who occupies Justin Amash's old seat, on how his party needs to reclaim the mantle of limited government, capitalism, and individualism.
The first-in-the-nation tax is an expensive and regressive policy that's also possibly unconstitutional.
He betrayed his oath and duties as president by hesitating to intervene and refusing to unambiguously condemn the violence.
Kim Ogg ran for district attorney as a criminal justice reformer. Maybe she should think about what that entails.
The plan would redistribute wealth, create distortions, and grow government.
Plus: Dems ask FDA to change abortion pill prescribing rule, Vice targets Clubhouse, and more...
He gets to the right answer, but botched the execution.
Why didn't Cuomo and De Blasio build a decent, user-friendly website?
The 33-year-old successor to Justin Amash's House seat says his party has abandoned limited government, economic freedom, and individualism.
No amount of parsing can obscure his responsibility for the deadly attack on the Capitol.
The former President's attorneys repeatedly (mis)cite the work of Professor Brian Kalt on late impeachments.
He is on firmer ground in arguing that the Senate does not have the authority to try a former president, although that issue is highly contested.
The letter was signed by some 170 legal scholars across the political spectrum, including several VC bloggers.
Fourth Amendment advocates prevail in Wingate v. Fulford.
The op ed, published today, explains why the First Amendment doesn't protect Trump against impeachment and conviction for his role in the attack on the Capitol.
Alas, the precedent for partisan votes on impeachment was set before Donald Trump.
This is probably not what Lyndon B. Johnson had in mind.
Plus: Pandemic housing prices are overvalued, U.S. will withdraw support for war in Yemen, and more...
Under fire for endorsing wacky conspiracy theories, the Georgia representative blames the internet.
Why Republican Senators can vote on the merits of Trump's impeachment even if they believe the Seante has no power to impeach ex-officers.
The Georgia representative has embraced nearly every crazy conspiracy theory that is popular on the right.
Senate Democrats will now take (partial) control of the Senate chamber.
The reconciliation process exists for a reason. Discarding it for political expediency should be viewed with skepticism.
There are plausible arguments on both sides of the debate.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks