Susan Rice Tries To Turn Possible Snowden Pardon Into Attack on GOP
All the worst people are still mad he blew the whistle on government snooping.
All the worst people are still mad he blew the whistle on government snooping.
A preliminary assessment of Trump v. Mazars and Trump v. Vance.
Both major parties defend the Constitution only when it's convenient.
Redundancy with an iron fist
The next Democratic president will be all too happy to govern by pen and phone too, say the Reason Roundtable podcasters.
Plus: Hong Kong police arrest pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai, Portland demonstrators set fire to police union headquarters, protests erupt against "Europe's last dictator," and more...
An ambiguous presidential order affecting a Chinese company connected to several popular video games sows confusion.
Plus: the latest unemployment numbers, Biden apologizes for comment on diversity, Ohio governor gets flip-flopping COVID-19 results, and more…
Will his blunt self-aggrandizement reinvigorate concerns about presidents who exceed their powers?
New York City's primary election fiasco reveals gross incompetence rather than fraud.
Department of Homeland Security
The lack of Senate-confirmed officers at DHS is a serious problem.
The lawsuit raises a variety of important issues, including a nondelegation challenge. It could turn out to be a very significant case.
Whitmer's argument is short on facts and legal reasoning.
The president’s heavy-handed response to protests against police brutality belies his promise of "law and order."
Two centuries of precedents say the president is not immune from judicial process.
The Reason Roundtable weighs in on the latest coronavirus policy debate.
An analysis finds that Trump is both more stingy and more self-serving than his predecessors in how he has used the pardon power to date
Stone was set to report to federal prison to serve 40 months for lying to Congress and witness tampering.
The Supreme Court weighs the legality of subpoenaing Trump’s financial records.
The Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's claims of immunity, but reaffirmed limits on investigatory powers, and ruled in favor of Native American tribal claims against Oklahoma.
SCOTUS rules 5–4 in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The article explains why these policies, which made made America more closed to immigration than at any previous time in history, are both harmful and a dangerous executive power grab.
In it I explain how to reform a federal law the Supreme Court has interpreted as giving the president nearly unlimited power to ban migrants from entering the United States.
Princeton's Omar Wasow talks about the complicated effects of civil rights demonstrations, police brutality, and racial fears on public policy.
Plus: unrest in Minneapolis, Twitter labels Trump tweet, and more...
It's great that Gov. Gavin Newsom is finally looking at costs and benefits. But don't kid yourself. None of it has anything to do with "science."
A president who can attach his own new conditions to federal grants to states could use that power to undermine state autonomy on many issues - especially now that federal spending has been massively expanded during the coronavirus crisis.
Congress created inspectors general to be watchdogs, but it's too weak-willed to protect those watchdogs from retaliation.
There is a difference between reporting facts that make the president uncomfortable and manufacturing facts to fit a preconceived view of him.
There was a potentially pivotal exchange in today's Supreme Court oral argument over the House subpoenas seeking the President's financial records.
An abuse of power that doesn't violate federal fraud statutes can still be an impeachable offense - and still violate other criminal law.
The 1961 speech by President Dwight Eisenhower foreshadowed the current government's response to COVID-19.
Why does it matter is a federal agency is independent of Presidential control? Ask the Department of Defense.
In an interview, the freshly-minted presidential candidate talks abortion, the "spoiler" charge, and Joe Biden's flip-flopping, while insisting that 2020 is a "winnable race."
Plus: Justin Amash seeking L.P. nomination, pandemic hasn't halted FDA war on vaping, and more
While denying Donald Trump's dictatorial impulses, William Barr notes that public health emergencies do not give governments unlimited powers.
Plus: New York legalizes Zoom weddings, federal labeling laws exacerbate grocery store shortages, and more...
The president contemplates a sweeping exercise of executive authority.
It's not the politicians who have the power to reopen America, or at least the parts that are now closed. It's individuals, families, businesses, and religious congregations.
The president has a history of asserting powers he does not actually have.
Plus: Americans plan to stay home for months, courts block more abortion bans, Amash "looking closely" at presidential run, and more...
"Presidential emergency action documents” concocted under prior administrations purport to give him such authority, according to a New York Times op-ed.
Hungary's Viktor Orbán consolidates power, Harvard's Adrian Vermeule fantasizes about wielding it, and many of those who oppose authoritarian conservativism beg Donald Trump to close the country down.
Takeout and delivery orders are the only thing keeping the state's 115 craft breweries afloat during the coronavirus outbreak.
Thought during an epidemic from a defender of freedom
“Why should courts, charged with the independent and neutral interpretation of the laws Congress has enacted, defer to such bureaucratic pirouetting?”
This inability to agree on the nature of the national interest is endemic not just to the new nationalism, but to all of politics.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10