Biting the Hands that Feed Us: Food Laws vs. Culinary Reality
"Food Freedom" advocate Baylen Linnekin says fewer, smarter laws would make our food system more sustainable.
"Food Freedom" advocate Baylen Linnekin says fewer, smarter laws would make our food system more sustainable.
Prosecutor: 'I don't write the laws, I enforce them.'
As the presidential race drags into the home stretch, food issues don't even rate as a blip on the polls.
USDA's diet guidelines are a mess because the information it uses is suspect.
As an ongoing lawsuit makes clear, the regulations are a joke. How do we fix them?
WHO's proposal that countries enact steep fees globally is wrong and unjustified.
Some federal label mandates drive up prices without making us safer.
A raid last month targeted a vendor who was selling chili at a farmers market.
Reason columnist Baylen Linnekin will talk about his new book in DC on Saturday, 1 P.M. at Politics & Prose.
If anything, Panty Peeler is a beer implicitly marketed to women-not men looking to take advantage of them.
That's ok, because human ingenuity and free markets satisfy increased demand.
It's is good for the environment and it feeds people too.
A pair of orchestrated hit pieces from media outlets has spurred the city to hand out massive fines.
If you think the FDA and food inspectors rather than vendors' desire not to kill their customers is what keeps you safe, you're an idiot.
Newly released historical documents show the Sugar Research Foundation paid scientists to blame fat and cholesterol, not sugar, for coronary heart disease.
According to state regulators, skim milk = skim milk + mandated additives.
Some states bar people from harvesting dead animals. But Montana has gotten good results from lifting its ban.
Like his candidate, Latino Donald Trump spokesman just doesn't get America, food, or entrepreneurship.
The feds are bailing out dairy producers. Here's why that's a terrible and wasteful mistake.
Maduro's government claims the lines are a calculated political attempt to stir up "anxiety."
Our food supply is safe, say 66 percent of Americans. And data backs them up.
"We'll look back on the factory-farm era with the same kind of ethical revulsion that we look back on slavery."
Why do we put up with laws and regulations that contribute to the problem?
Yes, it takes a bill to allow the food to be sold at the appropriate temperature.
Massive fines over a very common home-based business.
Hurting farmers and consumers. Squeezing out competitors. Forcing production abroad. Causing food waste. What's not to love?
Is the foolish campaign against energy drinks fizzling out?
Does Michelle Obama know the DNC is a "food desert"?
Ballot measure will decide in November whether to impose unwise, harmful, costly, and unconstitutional standards for raising a host of livestock animals.
A few new good laws go on the books, but many terrible ones remain.
The intended consequences of needlessly scaring consumers are bad enough, but now this too.
A handful of experts weigh in on a survey of nutritionist and consumer perceptions.
Preempts labeling requirements in Vermont and other states
The Ministry of Urban Agriculture promotes home and community gardening in hunger-wrecked Venezuelan cities.
Despite promises from activists and lawmakers, it won't help low-income consumers.
No dough. Cost benefit analysis be damned.
It's set to take effect next week and will cost food companies for no good reason.
A federal court finds Belgian-style witbier Blue Moon is not deceptively advertised as a craft beer.
You can lead people to Whole Foods, but you can't make them buy organic kale.