Pennsylvania Officer Tases Suspect in the Back Because He Didn't Cross His Ankles Quickly Enough
"Oh come on, bruh. You're really going to tase him? He was sitting down. That's crazy. That's why I record everything."
"Oh come on, bruh. You're really going to tase him? He was sitting down. That's crazy. That's why I record everything."
"This is not what the hate crime statute was for. This is criminalizing pure speech, and that violates the First Amendment."
Cop calls that supposedly show the trouble caused by dispensaries mostly had nothing to do with dispensaries.
Justice Kennedy's retirement will have a significant impact on the Roberts Court beyond its ideological makeup.
Would she have gotten a better deal if she hadn't been denied bail?
Pets shouldn't be treated as contraband.
A Politico symposium offers assessments by a wide range of legal scholars and commentators. And I offer some additional thoughts of my own.
In one surveillance video, the victim is tased four times for a total of 50 seconds.
Since 2005, just 32 officers involved in fatal shootings have been convicted on criminal charges.
A decision with major implications for the national injunction--not Trump v. Hawaii but Gill v. Whitford
Interview of David Sanger in episode 223 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
An interesting separate concurrence in the "travel ban" decision.
The Supreme Court justices divide among themselves in many different ways.
Mo money mo problems, open-air burn pits, and the case of the missing tattoos.
A big case. Here's an ongoing Q&A, which I will add to through the day.
Still more interesting line-ups from SCOTUS
The Court broke in untraditional ways in making decisions about taxing internet sales and the Appointments Clause
The case will decide whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment applies to the states. If so, it will also have to address how much it restricts asset forfeiture.
Today was a terrible, no-good, very bad day for Kris Kobach.
Episode 222 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
The justices will hear oral arguments next term in Timbs v. Indiana.
We'd be outraged by the unnecessary pursuit if Americans had been killed.
The Court has decided that almost all of the Bill of Rights applies to the states (with just a few exceptions that don't); now it will decide about the Excessive Fines Clause.
Masterpiece Cakeshop is not the only decision to surprise this term.
Crafted with love in the cellars of the Sixth Circuit.
A state audit finds the Aloha State isn't keeping track of the stuff it seizes.
Dangerous tennis shoes, a magnificent distillery, and bad advice from the IRS.
Bail revoked for breaking one of the fundamental rules: Don't meddle with the court case.
The president reverts to his original, highly implausible excuse for dismissing the FBI director.
There is no longer any legal or financial consequence for failing to comply with the individual mandate, so how are states (or anyone else) harmed by it?
Today, I suggest ways the Supreme Court might adjust qualified immunity doctrine to comport with evidence of its role in constitutional litigation, and ways lower courts might resolve qualified immunity motions to mitigate some of the worst aspects of the doctrine.
Law enforcement is upset, but data security is vital to prevent crimes.
A new report shows that the recent trend of reducing prison populations is heavily an urban phenomenon.
Good intentions may backfire on campus.
Although some have argued that qualified immunity encourages constitutional innovation, this defense of qualified immunity should not save the doctrine from the chopping block.
There's room for reasonable disagreement on many aspects of the latest ACA litigation, but the severability question should be clear.
A plan to divide California into three states will be on the state's referendum ballot in November. If it passes and is approved by Congress, it could potentially be a significant change for the better.
A Chicago suburb's law to confiscate firearms and magazines has been blocked by a temporary restraining order.
The Supreme Court should do away with or restrict qualified immunity because, in Justice Sotomayor's words, it "renders the protections" of the Constitution "hollow."