If "the notion that we can identify mass killers before they act" is a "fiction," the conventional policy responses to mass shootings are unlikely to be effective.
Store orders ban of violent displays, but is still selling guns and video games.
Plus: Marijuana banking, suing Facebook, and more...
The democratic socialist congresswoman also criticized Republican hypocrisy.
The former vice presidential candidate's revived defamation suit against The New York Times highlights the hazards of us-versus-them thinking.
It's foolish for media outlets to imply that laws which were signed in May and June were passed in relation to the tragic shooting in El Paso.
Avoid motions "for Leave to File Under Seal Any and All Documents and Depositions Cited in Support of Any Motion, Response, Reply, or Appendix Filed by the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant."
The law demands use of Real I.D. compliant identification for background checks that many state residents don't have
Owners painted the house bright pink and added two funny emojis after neighbors complained about illegal Airbnb rentals.
Plus: Chelsea Manning's latest motion is denied, Prager University's Google lawsuit is nonsense, and more...
While expressing concern for free speech and privacy, lawmakers are seriously threatening both.
Political donations are made public so that citizens can hold politicians accountable, not the other way around.
Here is how the states with "red flag" laws fail to protect the constitutional rights of gun owners.
What’s next for the Second Amendment at SCOTUS?
Plus: 8chan called before Congress, data privacy bill hits a snag, and more...
The Trump-endorsed response to mass shootings gives due process short shrift.
Though Fordham is a private university, under New York law private university decisions that violate the universities' own stated rules may be set aside by a court.
Deflections, generational conflict, and misleading data abound.
Because psychiatrists are terrible at predicting violent behavior, the wider net would catch lots of harmless people.
So holds a Second Circuit panel this morning.
Plus: Monday market swings spark freakout, Hong Kong "now a revolution," and more...
Plus: the budget deal, GOP retirements, and the latest front in the trade war.
Companies should forced neither to help spread offensive speech nor to suppress it.
The familiar proposals would do little or nothing to prevent attacks like these.
The president offers the worst of both worlds.
Plus: the trouble with "national conservatism," the decline of the mortgage interest deduction, and more...
Plus: A second shooting in Dayton leaves 9 dead, dozens injured.
... no matter the politician's race, sex, or religion, and no matter whether the speaker owns a gun store.
Under its "crime-free housing program," Granite City, Illinois, holds tenants strictly liable for illegal activity by a household member.
The suit came after the school denied funding to bring Dana Loesch and Andrew Klavan to campus.
The case was brought on the family's behalf by the Institute for Justice, a prominent public interest law firm.
His lawsuit claims the campus's procedures made a mockery of due process.
"I don't think that I deserve to pay $80 for something that is fixable — and I can fix it, if that's all you want me to do."
The presidential contender feels no need to defend the policies he favors, because "we all know" they are "the right thing to do."
He was hired to bring ideological diversity to The Atlantic and fired days later for being heterodox. He's not a fan of Donald Trump but finds his critics just as bad.
Episode 5 of Free Speech Rules, from UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh
The professor's immigration views are wrong, but removing her would compromise academic freedom.
In order to fight crime, Americans must...make their data more susceptible to hacking?
The Missouri senator thinks wasting time on Instagram is a problem so big that only the federal government can solve it.
Plus: Behind the bipartisan war on internet speech, New York "decriminalizes" pot (but you'll still get fined), and more...
The Sixth Circuit suggests an important limit on the Supreme Court's Nieves precedent, though it doesn't decide the question.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks