Divorcing Spouses Forbidden from "Disparaging" Each Other to Their Employers
A clear First Amendment violation, I think -- but it's the law in Tennessee.
A clear First Amendment violation, I think -- but it's the law in Tennessee.
Such inflammatory exaggeration seems designed to avoid a substantive discussion of the presidential candidate's gun control proposals.
The billionaire former three-term mayor of New York panders to Democratic loyalists rather than laying out a vision for a prosperous, tolerant America.
Online platforms would have to "earn" speech protections by compromising encryption—all in the name of fighting child porn.
GOP attacks on internet smut are heating up, but the porn industry has more practical threats to worry about.
40 privacy advocacy groups send open letter to agency
Plus: Santa Cruz decriminalizes shrooms, the feds target medical marijuana in Michigan, "the growing threat to free speech online," and more...
The attempted muzzling of the former national security advisor is dubious.
When politicians call to punish “disinformation,” we should worry about what that definition encompasses.
A century ago, the Wilson administration cracked down on immigrant anarchists. The raids lasted three months, and their impact was felt for decades.
The bill's requirements for "emergency" orders are loose, and it does not give respondents a right to a court-appointed lawyer.
Erroneous predictions of violence at the Richmond rally conflated civil libertarians with militant racists.
"Facial recognition represents a dystopic advancement of the police state."
That's the logical implication of a recent Second Circuit panel decision (though one involving a non-journalist).
A federal court has allowed the case to go forward, and is considering whether to preliminarily enjoin the restrictions.
orders university to temporarily reinstate accused student for Spring semester.
E-Verify makes life harder on immigrants who want to work, but it doesn't make things better for anyone—-even those who want to see those immigrants leave.
No, Californians aren't banned from showering and doing laundry on the same day. But the fact that so many people believed that lie says something about how insane the state's real water laws are.
A bipartisan coalition wants to restrain secret snooping and create more independent oversight of the secretive FISA Court.
Following an insider trading conviction and the collapse of his career, Damilare Sonoiki is suing Harvard.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is filing a defamation suit against Hillary Clinton
"I don't think you should do Twitter if you think you're better than Twitter."
The lawsuit might be good politics, but it's bad for free speech.
The article explains why the Supreme Court was justified in overruling longstanding precedent in this important recent constitutional property rights case.
Hundreds of police departments are using facial recognition technology without oversight.
Plus: Clinton says "nobody likes" Bernie, Biden wants Section 230 revoked, Iran takes responsibility for Jan. 8 plane crash, and more...
a good reason to repost Prof. Nicholas Johnson's guest-post on 2014, based on his book Negroes and the Gun.
A new story from Fox 11 (L.A.).
If politicians are going to paint their opponents as illegitimate, they should be prepared to receive the same treatment in return.
There is no easy way to determine whether someone is spending a lot on guns because they like guns or because they plan to commit an act of terror.
Some privacy activists say the bill still falls short.
The governor fears a gun-rights rally might turn violent; a judge refuses to stop him from barring weapons from the demonstration.
Biden tells the New York Times he would revoke Section 230 protections and hold Facebook (and other sites) liable for their content.
The petitioner, who cited the officer's 2017 shooting of her son, had no standing under Colorado's "red flag" law.
The song and music video amount to grotesque, self-obsessed celebrity activism.
The New York Public Library calls off an event featuring feminists who have clashed with the trans rights movement.
Don’t worry—America’s ruling factions still disagree over who should be in charge of the snooping.
"On the record before the Court, the movants have demonstrated 'sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation.'"
The Institute for Justice asks the Supreme Court to clarify a doctrine that shields cops from responsibility for outrageous conduct.
A new abortion case raises an old question.
After seriously messing up its warrant applications with the FISA Court, can the FBI be trusted?