Beware Censorship by Proxy
Prodding private companies into self-censorship is a dangerous government tradition.
Prodding private companies into self-censorship is a dangerous government tradition.
An interesting Arizona appellate decision rejecting a court's assignment of a treating therapist, and rejecting a gag order that limited parents' discussions with the child.
5 editorials call for the federal government to thwart Sinclair's expansion efforts in wake of creepy promo video; meanwhile you can count the number of anti-FOSTA eds on one finger
Giving juries the power to destroy a journalism enterprise for being offensive is bad for free expression.
Plus: YouTube shooter bought and registered gun legally.
Everett, Washington, continues to wage war against scantily clad "bikini baristas."
He is trashing the First Amendment to stifle the immigrant rights movement.
The ruling allows a civil suit against Backpage to proceed for one of the case's three plaintiffs.
Plus: Hackers take over Atlanta, demand ransom to lift lock on city computers.
The Forum features a talk by the author, with commentary by me.
The Trump administration is violating the rule of law in the name of upholding it.
More tech folks call themselves libertarian than anything else. So why are they afraid to speak up at work?
But wouldn't have stopped the Cambridge Analytica incident
And President Trump is mad at Amazon for...ruining the postal service?
Advertising "half-priced drinks" is legal. Advertising "two-for-one" drinks is not. Huh?
The retired justice wants to claw back parts of the Bill of Rights.
While America gawks at tales of consensual Trump-spanking, Internet freedom is coming under legislative and cultural attack
Proposal to verify online "bots" is security theater that will make it harder for small online firms to compete with the likes of Facebook.
Spokane Valley (Wash.) resists groups' letter opposing event put on by speaker who has at times drawn unruly supporters.
"They are being watched, and that's a problem."
The great content crackdown has begun.
The vigorous debate over censorship shows how much Iran has changed in recent years.
"The classroom should never be a place where students feel that they are picked at, bullied, intimidated."
The measure will "make it harder, not easier, to root out and prosecute sex traffickers," said Sen. Ron Wyden, one of only two senators to vote no on FOSTA.
"Keep fighting for free speech, the great meme war," said Count Dankula.
There is, it turns out, more to the Stormy Daniels Affair than meets the eye.
The National Lawyers Guild refused to run a congratulatory advertisement submitted by an Israeli organization -- the organization is suing for discrimination in "public accommodations," and a New York court has let the case go forward.
There's no reason for alarm (yet) over a Facebook data "breach" that benefited a firm with ties to Trump's campaign.
"Everything we think about the political correctness debate is wrong," says Vox's Matt Yglesias. Not exactly.
Declining support for unfettered debate among politicians, academics, and the public doesn't bode well for the future of free speech.
"If voters are making [stupid] decisions," says Senior Editor Jacob Sullum, "that's not the Russians' fault."
Nobody has the right to force bakers to print speech they hate. The debate is over what counts as speech.
Rep. Michelle DuBois wants to remove a statehouse sign that reads "General Hooker Entrance" because it is an affront to "women's dignity."
Under Stalin, people could be killed for carrying joke books about him. They did it anyway.
ACLU steps in to fight zoning regulations that appear to let officials veto art based on content.
A web developer's First Amendment lawsuit says Sibley, Iowa, officials conspired to silence him.
"Would that be allowed by the administration?"
For months, Penn Law has resisted calls to punish Amy Wax for her public comments on race. Yesterday, they caved.
"We do not do this lightly, but they have repeatedly posted content designed to incite animosity and hatred against minority groups."
Rallying to call for restrictive laws is a whole lot easier than getting people to submit to them.
Princeton University's Keith Whittington explains why it is sometimes wise -- even necessary -- to expose students to potentially offensive material
Marking the 54th anniversary of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
A lawsuit leads to a suggestion that the president engage in a kinder, gentler ignoring.
That is what students at the University of Miami School of Law are reporting. [EARLIER UPDATE: The Dean tells me that things are more complicated than at first reported, and they're trying to see if things can be worked out; I hope to have more from the Dean in a few days.] [UPDATE 3/15: The University has agreed to pay the security fee.]
It's not just the Second Amendment in their crosshairs.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10