A Federal Judge Blocks California's Ban on Medical Advice That Promotes COVID-19 'Misinformation'
U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb says the law is unconstitutionally vague.
U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb says the law is unconstitutionally vague.
"I think, in principle, it's ridiculous to have to deal with this eminent domain bullshit on the grounds of the Alamo," says owner Vince Cantu.
The researchers identified 662 cases involving threats to multiple victims, but they concede that it's likely "there are many more threats than completed events."
Justice Department regulations threaten people with prosecution for failing to register even when their state no longer requires it.
An appeals court rejected a qualified immunity defense.
If an order had been issued, it would have expired months before the attack unless police successfully sought an extension.
Two chapters of the organization say the law violates the First Amendment.
Even in cases that hinged on the trustworthiness of demonstrably untrustworthy cops, people are still waiting to get their money back.
The law authorizes regulators to discipline physicians who deviate from the "contemporary scientific consensus."
"While the procedural protections currently in place are grossly inadequate, we may soon be calling these the 'good old days.'"
A former guidance counselor served six years of a 25-year sentence thanks to a public defender's incompetence.
Under the new regulations, Title IX investigators can deny students access to the evidence against them.
Former Judges Mark A. Ciavarella and Michael T. Conahan are now serving lengthy prison sentences for what became known as the "kids-for-cash" scandal.
If the Supreme Court was correct in Dobbs, was it wrong in Bolling?
The Harris County, Texas, District Attorney's Office oversees civil forfeitures that make a mockery of justice.
Brookside faces several federal challenges for trying to fund its city by ticketing and towing the cars of anybody they can get away with.
The claims come in a lawsuit against Prince George's County (Md.).
The answers underline the limitations of laws that aim to prevent this sort of crime by restricting access to firearms.
The other justices declined to join him, but the future of the Supreme Court rulings on those matters remains unclear.
The new rules would drop live hearings, bring back the single-investigator model, and limit accused students' options.
The Biden administration just proposed new rules that would undermine basic fairness in college sexual misconduct disputes.
The legislation prohibits firearm sales based on juvenile records and subsidizes state laws that suspend gun rights without due process.
Senators are mulling legislation that would expand the categories of people who are disqualified from owning guns.
If Congress decides to encourage them, it should not overlook the importance of due process protections.
The change represents a substantial reversal of civil forfeiture reforms aimed at protecting innocent property owners.
Because there is no reliable way to identify future mass shooters, it is inevitable that many innocent people will lose their Second Amendment rights.
A "private educational institution owes a [tort law] duty, independent of any contractual promises, to adopt fair procedures and to implement those procedures with reasonable care when investigating and adjudicating claims of sexual misconduct by one student against another."
A federal lawsuit argues that the department's regulations violate due process, the separation of powers, and the First Amendment.
The torturous trial calls to mind Title IX investigations on college campuses.
Predicting violence is a lot harder than people claim in retrospect, and a wider net inevitably ensnares more innocent people.
Plus: Homeland Security's new Disinformation Governance Board, the FDA's menthol ban, and more...
Plus: The Warrant for Metadata Act, DOJ will appeal order ending mask mandate, and more...
Empyreal Logistics agreed to drop its claims against the Justice Department, but it is still suing San Bernardino County Sheriff Shannon Dicus.
Starr County District Attorney Gocha Allen Ramirez has yet to explain how this egregious error escaped his notice.
One of Ralph Petty's victims is trying to hold him accountable, but she will have to overcome prosecutorial immunity.
As Starr County District Attorney Gocha Allen Ramirez belatedly conceded, that charge is explicitly prohibited by the Texas Penal Code.
There's a particular richness to Republican senators weaponizing the right to defense counsel as an affront to the Constitution as opposed to something that's pivotal to it.
The Supreme Court nominee raised serious constitutional concerns about laws that punish sex offenders after they complete their sentences.
Although a Texas Supreme Court ruling ended the main challenge to the law, other cases could ultimately block its enforcement.
A federal judge declined to issue a temporary restraining order, saying the evidence of legal violations is insufficient at this point.
The Institute for Justice argues that the seizures violated state law, federal law, and the U.S. Constitution.
District Court Judge David Peeples focused on the law's "unique and unprecedented" enforcement mechanism rather than abortion rights.
The organization's embrace of a wide-ranging progressive agenda undermines its reason for existing.
Malinda Harris’ ordeal shows how easily the government can take innocent people’s property under civil forfeiture laws.
An important and interesting question, arising here as to Title IX, free speech, and due process, but relevant more generally as well (and now pending before the Supreme Court).
The IRS' track record suggests that beefed up enforcement will also mean more trampling of Americans' due process rights.
The jury rightly concluded that the prosecution failed to prove its case.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10