Supreme Court as Superweapon
A response to Epps and Sitaraman.
The constitutional showdown over federalism and immigration approaches SCOTUS.
Todd Henderson on the legal status of Eastern Oklahoma
The Supreme Court should not let police stop cars solely because they’re registered to people with suspended licenses.
Progressive purity tests and Supreme Court wish lists
Who will rein in the ever-expanding administrative state?
Efforts to take Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund off the Supreme Court's docket hit a snag.
The Supreme Court will consider a constitutional challenge to the composition of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Understanding what’s at stake in Ramos v. Louisiana.
Justices weigh textual conflict over what counts as “sex discrimination” versus what Congress originally intended.
Race-based admissions will likely make a return visit to the Supreme Court.
Does the Civil Rights Act of 1964 cover sexual orientation and gender identity?
The Supreme Court known for its skepticism of government regulation nonetheless upheld early environmental protection efforts.
The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation doesn't shed much light on the Supreme Court justice or the allegations against him.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders convinced the Fifth Circuit to declare the Federal Housing Finance Agency's structure unconstitutional, but they're seeking Supreme Court review nonetheless.
Congress takes up the issue of "acquitted conduct."
A former Scalia clerk revisits Justice Scalia's famed lecture on legal canards and offers a defense of textualism.
Qualified immunity protects cops from liability for actions that would land ordinary people in jail.
What’s at stake in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.
In a newly filed brief with the Supreme Court, the Justice Department claims the Consumer Financial Protection Board's structure is unlawful.
History provides a window into how abortion bans will play out if re-instituted.
Plus: Andrew Yang opts out of cancel culture, Andrew Cuomo wants to crack down on flavored e-cigarettes, and more...
Plus: 4 myths about social media law, Trump wants to ban cigarette alternatives, and more...
What’s at stake in Kansas v. Glover.
The Notorious RBG counsels against ideological litmus tests for judicial nominees.
The article is now available for free on SSRN.
Understanding what’s at stake in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia
Plus: North Carolina sues eight more e-cig companies, Tulsi Gabbard fails to meet debate threshold, and more...
It’s the Trump administration vs. civil rights groups on federal protections from workplace discrimination.
“Modern immunity practice—essentially 'heads government wins, tails plaintiffs lose'—leaves many victims violated but not vindicated."
The book by political scientist Michael Dichio argues that the Court has done more to promote centralization than protect states, and is the most thorough analysis to date, of this longstanding issue..
It’s time for SCOTUS to revisit the "border search exception" to the Fourth Amendment.
The five Democrats warn that the Court may have to be "restructured" if it keeps making decisions they don't like.
The justices would be abdicating their duty to uphold the Constitution if they let such political considerations decide legal issues.
The concerns I expressed about her record on property rights when I testified at her 2009 confirmation hearing were justified. But she has compiled an admirable record on several other issues.
Plus: Marijuana banking, suing Facebook, and more...
What’s next for the Second Amendment at SCOTUS?
Episode 5 of Free Speech Rules, from UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh
The liberal jurist puts judicial integrity before partisan politics.
The Notorious RBG seems to like her newest colleagues.
In recent interview, Justice Ginsburg says it would be a bad idea to increase the number of justices
“It should have been easy for the Court to say goodbye to Auer.”
The late Supreme Court justice was an inconsistent defender of civil liberties.
The retired Supreme Court justice has died at 99.
"It is illegal for employers in Washington to refuse to hire qualified potential employees because the employer perceives them to be obese."
An admirable man with a distinguished career as a Supreme Court justice. But also the author of some of the more problematic opinions of his era.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks