'No Reasonable Officer' Would Have Arrested a Guy for a COVID-19 Joke, the 5th Circuit Says
The appeals court ruled that a Facebook post alluding to World War Z was clearly protected by the First Amendment.
The appeals court ruled that a Facebook post alluding to World War Z was clearly protected by the First Amendment.
The former Minneapolis officer's 57-month sentence is based largely on the premise that he was "in the best position" to save Floyd.
The ruling draws back the veil on routine police practices that victimize innocent drivers.
The 11th Circuit rejected Sosa's constitutional claims, and he is asking the Supreme Court to intervene.
But poor record keeping hides the real number.
Snooping through emails, video, and photos isn’t the same as stumbling on containers full of cocaine.
All they found was some cool cars and clothes.
The lawsuit looks iffy in light of the Supreme Court's "open fields" doctrine.
The state court of appeals held previously that unconstitutionally collected evidence could still be used for civil enforcement.
Police have a long history of using the real or imagined smell of marijuana to justify outrageous invasions.
The Brookside Police Department’s shakedown of travelers became a national news story and prompted federal lawsuits.
Conservatives who support the bill recognize the conflict between unannounced home invasions and the Second Amendment.
Myles Cosgrove never faced criminal charges in connection with Taylor's death, but he was fired for his reckless use of deadly force.
Supervisors and judges tolerated outrageous constitutional violations, including illegal searches and brutal assaults.
We may have finally discovered a limit to judicial immunity.
"Active bystandership" training aims to overcome the pressures that discourage police officers from intervening when their colleagues use excessive force.
If Trump's handling of government secrets was "totally irresponsible," how should we describe Biden's conduct?
The appeals court says Donald Trump's status as a former president does not entitle him to special treatment.
The two fake news organizations want the Supreme Court to review the case of a man who was arrested for making fun of the police.
Judge Gary Klausner admits that the FBI probably hid their true motives in rifling through the contents of hundreds of safe deposit boxes, but says that's fine.
The 6th Circuit ruled that qualified immunity prevented Anthony Novak from vindicating his First Amendment rights.
The potential crimes that the FBI is investigating do not hinge on the current classification status of the records that the former president kept at Mar-a-Lago.
Even if Trump did declassify those records, the 11th Circuit says, he "has not identified any reason that he is entitled to them."
In any case, that issue does not seem relevant under the statutes that the FBI cited in its search warrant.
The former president's legal team notably did not endorse his claim that he automatically declassified everything he took with him.
"Nuclear weapons issue is a Hoax," says the former president, who insists that nothing at Mar-a-Lago was actually classified.
That failure adds to the evidence that Trump or his representatives obstructed the FBI's investigation.
There are still lingering questions about the former president's criminal liability and the threat posed by the documents he kept.
We still know almost nothing about their contents, which is relevant in assessing the decision to search Mar-a-Lago.
Although U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart is inclined to unseal the document, redactions demanded by the Justice Department could make it hard to understand.
Reinforcing the FBI's suspicions was the whole point of that document, which is likely to remain sealed.
Whatever threat it may have posed, the trove of government documents seized by the FBI does not reflect well on the former president's judgment.
The former president thought his 2016 opponent should go to prison for recklessly endangering national security.
As the response to the Mar-a-Lago raid illustrates, Republicans are inconsistent in the other direction.
Lethal drug raids in Louisville and Houston were based on fishy police affidavits that turned out to be fraudulent.
So far no one has been held criminally liable for the disastrous drug raid, which was based on a flimsy and falsified search warrant affidavit.
The Harris County, Texas, District Attorney's Office oversees civil forfeitures that make a mockery of justice.
On average, the minimum requirement for cops is about 650 hours, compared to about 1,300 hours for barbers.
The case shows how lax supervisors, incurious prosecutors, deferential judges, credulous jurors, and inattentive defense attorneys abet police misconduct.
The Institute for Justice urges SCOTUS to renounce that open-ended exception to the Fourth Amendment.
Despite the stakes, the former Minneapolis police officer could not bring himself even to feign regret for his actions.
Michael Lowe is suing the company in Texas, saying its negligence led to a life-changing ordeal.
The change represents a substantial reversal of civil forfeiture reforms aimed at protecting innocent property owners.
The lawsuit over Timpa's deadly prone restraint, initially blocked by qualified immunity, was revived by the 5th Circuit.
The settlement came after the Justice Department agreed to return more than $1 million in proceeds from state-licensed marijuana businesses in California.
"This is such outrageous behavior by the FBI," a D.C. Circuit judge says, calling the agency's special treatment of rich people "deeply troubling."