Free Speech Defenders Warn Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez That She Is Violating the Constitution by Blocking Critics on Twitter
The same First Amendment principles that apply to the president also apply to the congresswoman.
The same First Amendment principles that apply to the president also apply to the congresswoman.
Even as the senator calls Donald Trump a press-bullying authoritarian, he threatens press freedom in the name of preserving "independent" media.
By punishing Jeff Klinzman, Kirkwood Community College has dealt a blow to free speech.
"Joke or not, these types of comments are felonies under the law," says the Volusia County Sheriff's Office
The Democratic presidential contender suggests that "racist threats or anti-immigrant manifestos" could justify federal gun confiscation orders.
The nation's leading scholar of mass shootings explains how media coverage of horrific events such as El Paso and Dayton stoke unwarranted fear and anxiety.
The constitutional amendment they support, like the president’s plan to regulate social media, trusts the government to moderate our political debate.
The Democracy for All Amendment aims to mute some voices so that others can be heard.
It would essentially be a Fairness Doctrine for the internet.
Liability safe harbors for Internet intermediaries are not responsible for Internet "hate speech"
Plus: Marijuana banking, suing Facebook, and more...
Owners painted the house bright pink and added two funny emojis after neighbors complained about illegal Airbnb rentals.
Plus: 8chan called before Congress, data privacy bill hits a snag, and more...
Plus: the budget deal, GOP retirements, and the latest front in the trade war.
The suit came after the school denied funding to bring Dana Loesch and Andrew Klavan to campus.
Plus: Behind the bipartisan war on internet speech, New York "decriminalizes" pot (but you'll still get fined), and more...
While the teenager has a legitimate beef about coverage of his encounter with Native American activist Nathan Phillips, that doesn't mean he has a legal cause of action.
From Josh Hawley to Kamala Harris, online free speech is under attack.
The presidential hopeful alleges the company violated her First Amendment rights when it suspended her campaign advertising site for 6 hours.
Superior Court Judge Rochelle East says the warrant violated California law.
Donald Trump is far from the only person who doesn't understand the Bill of Rights.
No diploma, no making money telling people how to eat better.
The pundit made the claim at a Senate hearing on allegations of tech censorship against conservatives.
The late Supreme Court justice was an inconsistent defender of civil liberties.
Trump supports a bill that would encourage censorship in the name of free speech.
The law is an ass, cleft and all.
Aggressive asset forfeiture collides with First Amendment rights.
The president invited Republican lawmakers as well as social media stars who claim that tech giants are suppressing free speech.
The New York congresswoman's use of Twitter seems similar to the president's in constitutionally relevant ways.
New Orleans can't use zoning regulations to decide what counts as artistic expression.
The court says the "interactive space" created by his account is a public forum, meaning that the president's viewpoint discrimination violates the First Amendment.
HBO documentary explores teen’s culpability in boyfriend’s suicide.
Nicole Prause and Donald Hilton, longtime opponents on the subject of pornography, are now facing off in court.
The state's Liquor and Cannabis Board changed its policy after Hempfest and two marijuana retailers challenged it on constitutional grounds.
The government's latest moral crusade shields traffickers, empowers pimps, and undermines free speech online.
That result "may strike some as unfair," the court says, but it's what state law required at the time.
A 6-3 ruling says that the First Amendment protects brand names that are considered “immoral” or “scandalous.”
A local bakery accused the college of defamation after students launched a public campaign against the store for racial profiling. Oberlin mounted a free speech defense.
Hawley is selling it as a way to fight tech-company "bias" against Republicans. Don't believe him.
In a letter to Dame explaining why the ads had been rejected, the MTA cited longstanding rules against ads "promoting a sexually oriented business."
The president's spokeswoman is doing what she has always done on TV, unencumbered by the legal distinction between partisan pundit and executive branch employee.
Nancy Pelosi's overwrought take on Donald Trump's receptiveness to "oppo research" is hard to take seriously.
The debate about whether the killer should have been prosecuted for federal hate crimes shows how the Justice Department targets defendants based on the opinions they express.
New Jersey’s lousy craft beer rules are an affront to free speech and consumer choice
The People v. Lawrence Ferlinghetti explains how America embraced free speech—and how we're ready to throw it away.
The Seattle festival's organizers argue that banning signs referring to state-licensed cannabusinesses violates the state and federal constitutions.
The move violates the First Amendment, according to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10