Biden's 'Buy American' Electric Vehicle Tax Credits Go Into Effect
The credits may be well-intentioned, but they will distort the market and lead to a windfall for U.S. companies.
The credits may be well-intentioned, but they will distort the market and lead to a windfall for U.S. companies.
The Biden administration wants as many as two-thirds of all new vehicles sold in the U.S. by 2032 to be electric. But the market should decide how to make that switch.
In 2021, the state of Georgia made an expensive bet on an unproven company that could be headed for financial catastrophe.
Volkswagen unveiled a cheap new electric concept car, but protectionist policies mean it's not worthwhile for the company to introduce it in the U.S.
Federal, state, and local officials will always threaten to weaponize the state against private actors they don't like. The "Kia Challenge" provides the latest example.
Beware of activists touting "responsible research and innovation." The sensible-sounding slogan masks a reactionary agenda.
Americans are increasingly buying electric cars. Electrochemists and their innovations will drive down the cost of powering them.
Stellantis, one of the largest automakers on the planet with billions in cash on hand, got a generous handout from the state of Indiana for choosing to build its battery manufacturing plant there.
The factory may have been a bad deal for Virginia, but tying the decision to Chinese aggression is the wrong move.
A Swedish company will soon be delivering electric single-person aircraft that can take off and land vertically, which the F-35B struggles with despite billions in funding.
Good intentions, bad results.
Honda, one of the world's largest automakers, announced it would spend $4 billion building and upgrading factories in Ohio. The state is showering it with public funds anyway.
While that might seem backward, even the most worthwhile green energy goals will require some level of trade-off if they are to be achieved.
The current franchise dealership model does not benefit consumers. It also may not benefit dealerships.
If you believe that moving most of our chip production onshore is good for national security, you should labor for regulatory reforms rather than subsidies.
North Carolina wins "America's Top State for Business" by picking winners and losers.
The United States should consider adopting a market-based strategy for increasing electric vehicle usage.
The video game serves as a fun reminder that free trade, not protectionism, makes us all better off.
The state's new rules on vulgar vanity plates could amount to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination.
It's unwise to try to force consumer spending habits in defiance of the market.
Only vehicles made in unionized U.S. factories qualify for the full amount.
Richard Martinez lost his dream car because of VIN-plate issues prosecutors admit he was "not aware of."
As early as 2026, new cars will have to come equipped with "advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology."
Plus: Americans evenly split on immigration, bill moves to stop EPA raids of auto shops, and more...
The never-released Trump administration report is a reminder that "national security" is usually a bogus reason to impose tariffs
The costly fight over a “right to repair” proposal has led to a lot of cybersecurity fearmongering.
Maybe California will figure out how to keep the lights on by then.
Unless you are especially dedicated to seeing the world and willing to run a gauntlet of hassles to do so, travel is poised to become a more local activity.
A new lawsuit is challenging the California DMV's rejection of allegedly offensive personalized license plates.
Trump, big labor, and America's reputation as a trading partner emerge as winners, but free trade takes the loss in the USMCA.
What happened to me could have happened to a cyclist or pedestrian. Blame cars, not scooters.
We’re going to need a lot more sensing equipment—and fast. Here’s how to do it.
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement includes a handful of protectionist measures that would likely slow the U.S. economy and harm American automakers.
After state lawmakers boosted the gas tax with a promise to improve California streets, some cities are upsetting drivers by spending millions on so-called 'road diet' projects that reduce the number of lanes for motor vehicles.
Trump isn't putting any tariffs on imported cars right now, but the White House has released a report that effectively allows the president to do that any time he chooses.
Following a Reason investigation into Chicago's punitive vehicle impound program, a new lawsuit alleges the practice violates Chicagoans constitutional rights.
Intelligent Speeding Assistance raises practical and privacy concerns.
That should be enough to end this silly debate. But what the president says and what the president does are not always the same.
Trump could destroy American jobs and America's relationship with Germany at the same time.
American cars with foreign parts will suffer too.
Because of tariffs, Ford hourly employees will lose out on $750 they would have otherwise received.
Also: How much should we care that Trump & co. lied in 2016 about a Putin-proximate real estate deal in Russia?