Eric Swalwell, Pope Fight, Tax Day Woes
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi discuss Eric Swalwell's fall from grace and how tax day radicalizes us every year.
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi discuss Eric Swalwell's fall from grace and how tax day radicalizes us every year.
The court ruled that police can demand a physical ID under the state's stop-and-identify law.
Instead of confronting the problems with the state's heavily regulated insurance market, lawmakers are looking for a scapegoat.
Plus: The House passes a short-term FISA extension, Ron Wyden urges fellow Senate Democrats to oppose a "clean" bill, and Norway gets robot buses.
Republicans can’t decide whether the war is too early to stop, too late to stop, or nonexistent in the first place.
The Justice Department is permanently blocked from prosecuting Californians who fail to register when the state no longer requires it.
The plan is not completely terrible. But many importers may still have difficulty getting the refund money owed to them.
What is a greater rejection of America's founding ideals than an overreaching government trampling the First Amendment?
Remembering the infuriating case of United States v. “The Spirit of ’76.”
Government rules have made it far more expensive for families.
A popular revolt against state-led zoning reform in Colorado, Massachusetts' contradictory approach to housing supply, and how municipalities lobby to kill housing.
Plus: The Alito retirement rumors keep swirling.
Red tape issued by bureaucrats outstrips the impact of legislation.
Act 10 saved taxpayers billions and helped government run more efficiently. Fifteen years later, a questionable legal challenge may doom it.
As lawmakers of both major parties hustle to regulate their preferred villains, they're losing sight of the big picture. The possible gains to humanity from AI are enormous.
The outcome is unclear. But the judges seemed skeptical of the Trump Administration's claims that Section 122 grants them sweeping tariff powers.
The case will determine whether an unnamed plaintiff can take the hospital and its doctors to federal court.
The Court of International Trade is weighing the legality of the import taxes that the president wants to impose under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
One weird trick could extend Social Security's solvency while reducing payments to the wealthiest households. But it doesn't go far enough.
It would be easy to wave it away and move on. But that's how the U.S. got in such a dire fiscal situation.
The feeling is perfectly consistent: Graham feels it should be as easy as possible for the U.S. to start a war, and as hard as possible to end one.
How the digital privacy rights of millions are at stake in Chatrie v. United States.
I submitted the brief on behalf of the Cato Institute and myself.
The Administration's constitutional arguments are unconvincing, but rejecting them is not necessary to decide United States v. Barbara
Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
"No statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon concluded when he enjoined the project.
Plus: Fox and Sinclair go crying to the FCC over sports streaming, and the Masters ticket lottery makes it too hard to get in
Plus: Wisconsin governor vetoes porn age-check bill, more charges for penis protester, the Komodo dragon theory of social media, and more...
Both Donald Trump and Joe Biden asked the Supreme Court to abolish nationwide injunctions, which allow federal judges to stop a federal policy from going into effect.
The government's new rule reverses a Biden-era anti-contracting directive and returns to a more contractor-friendly posture. But will this tug of war ever end?
There are far too few checks left on executive power.
The proposal is "an enormous waste of taxpayer dollars and would make Americans less, not more, safe." Thankfully, Congress is unlikely to adopt it.
A week after Bernie Sanders introduced legislation to pause AI data center construction indefinitely, Maine is poised to institute the first statewide ban.
There is no voting crisis that demands federal intervention.
A new book revisits this 50-year-old Watergate report as President Donald Trump pursues his own politically motivated investigations.
"It shouldn't be this hard to give birth safely in the state of Alabama, and it doesn't have to," said the ACLU's lead counsel on the case.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara.
The Trump administration keeps trying to find legal loopholes, but the will of the people is the final judge of any major policy.
There was little rhyme or reason to the president's "emergency" tariffs, which fluctuated wildly depending on his mood.
The bill would not only codify Trump's actions into law, it would establish a framework for both this and future administrations to do it too.
Rather than debating over who should fill the role, Congress and the White House should just eliminate it altogether.
But only if politicians learn to focus on the boring basics of aviation policy.
Understanding the stakes in Trump v. Barbara.
A court sets aside a federal arson conviction (which would have carried a "mandatory minimum sentence" of "seven years") for a fan's throwing flares at a soccer stadium and causing minor damage and a minor injury.
How America's old-age entitlement system became a sprawling lifestyle-subsidy program that steals from the poor to give to the rich.
A war by any other name must still be authorized by Congress.
Plus: the Facebook verdicts, porn star chatbots, facial recognition gone awry, drag queen regulation, and more…
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.