Is Humphrey's Executor in the Crosshairs?
Firing members of "independent" agencies would seem to set up a direct challenge to a longstanding precedent.
Firing members of "independent" agencies would seem to set up a direct challenge to a longstanding precedent.
These bills—in Indiana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and South Carolina—could also imperil IVF practices and threaten care for women with pregnancy complications.
Jack Goldsmith offers his analysis.
A dissent from the denial of certiorari in another Sixth Circuit Habeas case.
The executive order contradicts the 14th Amendment and 127 years of judicial precedent.
The article explains why the order is unconstitutional and why letting it stand would be very dangerous, including for the civil liberties of US citizens.
Curtrina Martin's petition attracted support from a bipartisan group of lawmakers.
Local news reports detail how Polk County, Minnesota, charges drivers and petty offenders with drug-free zone violations like no other county in the state.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
This rogue agency stifles innovation, drives up costs, and infantilizes consumers—all while operating without accountability.
A law passed in 2022 requires the president to give Congress a "substantive rationale" for removing inspectors general. Trump has not done that.
"I can tell you that I have never been put in a position of doubting my own sanity like I was in the hands of those police officers," Knox tells Reason.
But at least he restored respect for a tariff-loving predecessor by renaming a mountain.
Former Rep. Justin Amash explains why President Donald Trump's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong.
By the end of 2025, as many as 100 million Americans could live in a state where they can be reported for protected expression.
The past three administrations have tried to limit gain-of-function research. The second Trump administration might be the first one to be successful at doing so.
The arguments are not new. The willingness of an Administration to act on them are.
“I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is,” said Judge John C. Coughenour.
Not doing so could be harmful for just about everyone.
They are allied countries with which the U.S. has a trade deal (a deal negotiated by Trump, no less), but presidential emergency powers are nearly limitless.
New historical evidence on the ERA's invalidity.
Robert Roberson was sentenced to death based on outdated and largely discredited scientific evidence.
Like many of his other "Day 1" decrees, the order seems more concerned with scoring points in the culture war than advancing sensible policy.
The Fraternal Order of Police mistakenly thought that the president "supports our law enforcement officers" and "has our backs."
A thicket of red tape has made the island's rebuilding efforts painfully slow.
The dawn of a new golden age?
We have too much rule by decree by whoever currently holds the office of president and a pen.
Biden’s preemptive pardons and Trump’s blanket relief for Capitol rioters both set dangerous precedents.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about the validity of using emergency measures to restrict movement during the L.A. wildfires.
The president drew no distinction between people who merely entered the building and people who vandalized it or assaulted police officers.
The most important thing in any name is not what some official institution or a collection of old maps says. Spontaneous order tends to rule the day.
Children could be denied citizenship even if their parents are here completely legally.
Lawmakers across the country introduce bills to strengthen private property rights, crackdown on out-of-control regulators, and get the government out of micromanaging stairways.
Domestic deregulation will decrease the cost of living. Trade barriers will do the opposite.
Plus: Pardoning the Proud Boys, revoking birthright citizenship, Elon Musk's not-a-Nazi-salute, and more...
His last-minute acts of clemency invite Trump and future presidents to shield their underlings from the consequences of committing crimes in office.
Several of his announced actions are likely to be illegal, especially some related to immigration.
Plus: Fauci preemptively pardoned, hostages released, Inauguration Day, and more...
My latest article with Michael Stokes Paulsen is in print
Dan Epps and I discuss Royal Canin v. Wullschleger and TikTok v. Garland on the latest episode of Divided Argument
The popular video app restored service in the U.S. after President-elect Donald Trump promised to postpone a federal ban.
Riley's murder was an atrocity. But the law bearing her name is a grab bag of authoritarian policies that have little to do with her death.
In granting Mahmoud v. Taylor, the Supreme Court has agreed to consider this question.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10