A Limited Supreme Court Win for Trump on Mail-In Ballots
But the legal fighting will continue in the lower courts.
But the legal fighting will continue in the lower courts.
when plaintiff has passport that won't expire until 2032.
Section 338 is a long-defunct part of the notorious Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930.
Plus: ICE chillin', Moderna-Merck melanoma advances, and more...
An election law question that seems destined for the Supreme Court.
A bill to sanction Russia would allow the president to place 100 percent tariffs on goods from countries that buy Russian fossil fuels.
A persuasive opinion by Judge Eric Miller curtails the Trump Administration's attempt to color outside the lines.
There are better ways to encourage more regular lawmaking than abolishing the filibuster.
Less than two months after losing at SCOTUS, Trump tries again with more misguided executive orders.
France's top court ruled that a social media ban for under-15s would infringe on free expression and privacy.
Is it named after the father of geometry or a Cleveland suburb? Both.
In one case after another, the president has tried to cut the courts out of the picture painted by the Framers.
"The most transparent president in history" keeps chipping away at laws like FOIA meant to keep the government honest.
For too long, the government has acted as if any child venturing out unsupervised is in danger—and has negligent parents.
A federal appeals court ruled that Curtis Whateley's anti-police vanity plate was private speech protected by the First Amendment. Virginia says it will seek review from the Supreme Court.
The Oregon senator's "For Our Republic Act" would check many of the president's abuses while preserving the powerful federal state he commands.
The Democratic nominee won five swing states by less than one percentage point. Then things got crazy.
In under five months, waiving the protectionist law opened up whole trade routes and sent fuel to areas that needed it. Why go back?
Transparency advocates say it's the latest attempt to hide more of the executive branch's business from the public and congressional investigations.
A comptroller audit says New York State's recycling data are unreliable.
California's attorney general is fighting a merger that 65 countries and the DOJ already cleared. Now, the state may lose thousands of jobs.
Reformers need to take into account people’s fear of crime and human predators.
Plus: No one is drafting Enes Kanter Freedom into the WNBA, Congress fails to reform NCAA again, and why Field of Dreams nostalgia is no good
Plus: A setback for Mamdani's second-home tax, Jones Act waiver extended, Ross Douthat's final column, and more...
Did he make a true threat? Or was this just hyperbolic ranting about bad policy?
The Constitution assigns control of federal property to Congress, which never approved the president's demolition and replacement of the East Wing.
Food-related taxes are rising in popularity, though they hurt restaurants and customers—and may even fail as a revenue-raising tool.
The two measures combine unconstitutional provisions with performance art.
The proposed tax would rise with unemployment and fund a new federal jobs program—even though AI has yet to cause mass unemployment.
The ban would gut a growing industry, but the Trump administration’s position isn’t a principled stand against prohibition.
The DOGE project was the second Trump administration's best idea. Unfortunately, it was terribly executed.
Misconduct and misrepresentations by Justice Department lawyers have led some federal judges to question the traditional benefit of the doubt they give to the government.
The Senate Commerce committee advanced four bills related to online and AI safety in the name of protecting children.
When Congress eliminated taxes on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns, it also eliminated the constitutional justification for regulating them.
A new Hawaii law reclassifies corporate political speech as a "power" the state can revoke at will.
A new podcast from the National Constitution Center
The “father of the Constitution” worried about federal and state overreach.
El-Sayed is pushing a mendacious claim: that people would be wealthier if they endured yet another massive transfer of money and power to a vast federal health bureaucracy.
The Senate’s funding bill stops the Trump administration from handing political appointees control over federal grants, but Congress isn’t eager to rein in spending.
The article explains why the new tariffs are harmful and illegal for many of same reasons as those invalidated by the Supreme Court.
The liberal justice wants the Supreme Court’s harshest progressive critics to chill out.
A guest post by Georgetown legal scholars Peter E. Harrell and Jennifer Hillman.
The acting attorney general confirms his dishonesty in presenting that jaw-dropping scam as the resolution of a bona fide legal dispute.
The prominent liberal legal scholar and former ACLU leader outlines how the Court has often checked Trump, but also critiques it for going against precedent.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.