Charlottesville White Nationalist Sues 'To Bring Civility Back,' Wins $5 in Damages From Woman Who Cursed Him Out
A woman screamed "fuck you" and "fuck you, asshole," at the white nationalist, in addition to calling him a "murderer" and a "crybaby."
A woman screamed "fuck you" and "fuck you, asshole," at the white nationalist, in addition to calling him a "murderer" and a "crybaby."
The story of how classical liberal Justice George Sutherland enabled executive overreach abroad.
Amash was one of just three House Republicans to vote against the spending bill.
What piece of legislation could have prevented yesterday's attack?
Forget coat-hangers and back alleys. The future of illegal abortions is online pharmaceuticals.
How much deference should amicus briefs and agency advocacy receive from the courts?
More than 100 Republicans voted against the GOP's "compromise" bill.
The op ed outlines some of the grave flaws in today's Supreme Court ruling.
"It's all working out great," Trump said in South Carolina. Few people seem to agree with that assessment.
In a civil suit, Paul's attorney claims the senator has been the victim of "physical pain and mental suffering."
Some preliminary comments on a badly flawed ruling.
Is it really fair for we who benefited from fossil fuels to blame for global warming on those who supplied what we demanded?
Law professors Randy Barnett and Michael Dorf argued over "originalism" at an event hosted by the Soho Forum.
The ruling also raises questions about the future viability of "Chevron deference."
A blow against federalism, tax competition, and small businesses trying to expand.
Justice Kennedy calls for reconsidering parts of the Court's Chevron jurisprudence.
In a concurring opinion issued today, the Supreme Court's key swing vote justice expressed serious misgivings about a major Supreme Court precedent requiring courts to defer to executive branch administrative agencies.
Can the president of the United States be sued for damages in a civil proceeding?
Congress should resist the call of special interests.
Trump's plan to cut $15 billion in spending really would have cut only about $1.1 billion. Its rejection is depressing anyway.
Bilal Abdul Kareem has been nearly droned in Syria five times already. A federal judge agrees his lawsuit over the matter can proceed.
Rising benefits costs and a bloated administration is putting Los Angeles' schools deep in the red.
A bill would allow some officials retroactive access to potentially 10 years of pension payments. Guess who would be on the hook for it?
Reason editors discuss what anti-immigration fantasy looks like when translated into policy, and how education diversity goals lead to discrimination.
The bill is called the Curbing Realistic Exploitative Electronic Pedophilic Robots, or CREEPER, Act. Of course.
The school district points fingers at charter schools instead of trying to slim down and compete, a new report says.
June 12 was not a good day for free-market constitutionalism in the modern GOP.
Voters will get to consider a plan to create three smaller states, but politicians will make the call.
But their chances of getting the FCC repeal overturned remain slim.
Is the Republican Party now the party of Trump?
The president has discovered the power of the pardon. Could that make this a moment for criminal justice reform?
But once again, California voters will get a choice between two Democrats for the Senate in November.
"There's no for-profit business in the world that could sustain itself or survive with $20 trillion in debt," says Howard Schultz. "It's just not responsible."
Conduct that does not meet the legal criteria for an obstruction charge could still be serious enough to justify impeachment.
After oral arguments last year, Stephanie Slade correctly observed that "justices might have found a sort of get-out-of-jail-free card." Also on the Reason Podcast: Bill Clinton, Roseanne, Samantha Bee, Kim Kardashian, and maybe the worst celebrity of the week, Larry Kudlow.
The Supreme Court's ruling was based on state officials' apparent hostility to the bakers' religious beliefs. There is far stronger evidence of such hostility in the travel ban case.
Arizona jurist Clint Bolick targets judicial pacifism in medical marijuana case.
But he's leaving office without really addressing the state's massive public retirement problem.
The doctors' lobby is right that the arbitrary rule is medically unsound and misconstrues the CDC's guidelines.
Having two senators who opposed the Iran deal show up to denounce Trump for pulling out of the Iran deal was only the beginning of the hypocrisy exhibition.
Immigrants who commit crimes should be punished. But no more than others who commit the same offense.
Here's how to tell a productive food-related lawsuit from a frivolous one.
Reason's Mike Riggs discusses how class anxiety, busybodyism, and a lack of empathy are making America a less-great country.
Despite the administration's claims to the contrary, it appears that no such thing exists. Its absence strengthens the constitutional case against the travel ban.
Some originalists believe that following the original meaning of the Constitution is intrinsically valuable, while others support it only for instrumental reasons. The difference between the two approaches has important implications.
The lopsided House vote for treating assaults on cops as federal crimes is a bipartisan portrait in cowardice.
President expected to sign legislation allowing earlier access to experimental medication.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau stays, but Obama-era regulations that suffocated small banks are toast.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks