Preliminary injunction against New York bans on licensed carry
Gun Owners of America prevail in Antonyuk v. Hochul
Gun Owners of America prevail in Antonyuk v. Hochul
If the bird site's new owner wants to protect free speech, he should focus on resisting government requests to remove content.
In 2020, police severely injured Karen Garner when they arrested her for petty theft. While two officers faced time behind bars for the incident, a newly released report makes even more misconduct public.
No one is confused about whether Tofurky is turkey.
Even in cases that hinged on the trustworthiness of demonstrably untrustworthy cops, people are still waiting to get their money back.
The Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in Timbs v. Indiana revived the Excessive Fines Clause. Now state courts have to come up with tests to determine what's excessive.
Collin College fired Suzanne Jones in 2021, after she voiced support for union activity and the removal of Confederate monuments.
Priscilla Villarreal found herself in a jail cell for publishing two routine stories. A federal court still can't decide what to do about that.
Plus: Congress remains too cautious about marijuana, myths about independent contractors, and more...
The crucial protector of internet speech might have some cracks in its armor.
The law authorizes regulators to discipline physicians who deviate from the "contemporary scientific consensus."
On Tuesday, the senator erroneously claimed that "free speech does not include spreading misinformation."
Plus: The emptiness of Democrats' pro-democracy rhetoric, the real reason Social Security checks are getting bigger, and more...
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Robby Soave, and Zach Weissmueller
So holds the Ninth Circuit; Hamilton plays a major role.
The journalist and comedian makes the case that "new puritans" espousing the religion of social justice have captured the Western world.
Andrew Doyle on the "new puritans" and their godawful religion of social justice.
Voters will soon cast ballots on a constitutional amendment that seeks to explicitly remove any protections for abortion in the state's constitution.
Plus: International attitudes about Russia and China, court rules against book publishers merging, and more...
The music industry objects to the use of rap lyrics by prosecutors.
Out-of-state and self-managed abortions pose daunting challenges for pro-life legislators.
The two fake news organizations want the Supreme Court to review the case of a man who was arrested for making fun of the police.
"While the procedural protections currently in place are grossly inadequate, we may soon be calling these the 'good old days.'"
Plus: Hate speech is free speech, tax gap is stable, and more...
Plus: For Halloween, the editors describe what scares them most about politics and government right now.
In the two cases, brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions argues that race-conscious admissions violate the Civil Rights Act
The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI regularly report misinformation and disinformation to tech companies for potential removal.
The report highlights the power and limits of state bans as well as the difficulty of measuring their impact.
A federal judge denied qualified immunity for officers accused of making up charges to get money from fines.
A federal judge suggested that plaintiffs can sue as John Does only to the extent that identifying them would also identify nonparties who want to remain anonymous (such as the students who accused the plaintiffs of sexual misconduct).
Plus: Brazil's Bolsonaro loses, fact-checking Biden on the Inflation Reduction Act, and more...
The agency should be abolished and its employees sent to seek jobs in the private sector.
An interesting echo, I think, of NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware (1982).
New data from the Public Religion Research Institute show a dramatic decline in Republican support for making abortion illegal in all cases. How this will effect voter behavior remains to be seen.
[NOTE: There is nothing parodic or facetious about any item in this post; it is entirely accurate. No, seriously, it is. Really, I mean it, really.]
The Institute for Justice argues evidence from warrantless searches can’t be used for zoning enforcement.
Plus: Charlottesville cracks down on city employee speech, judge dismisses "blackout challenge" lawsuit against TikTok, and more...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10