These 7th Circuit Decisions Suggest Amy Coney Barrett Takes a Constrained View of Qualified Immunity
In several cases, the Supreme Court nominee voted to allow civil rights lawsuits against officers accused of misconduct.
In several cases, the Supreme Court nominee voted to allow civil rights lawsuits against officers accused of misconduct.
Plus: 898,000 new jobless claims, and more...
The subject of the new film Mighty Ira explains why social justice warriors are wrong to attack free speech.
"Barrett says she owns a gun, but could fairly judge a case on gun rights" -- why the "but"?
The senator thinks people with felony records should lose the right to armed self-defense but not the right to cast a ballot.
If that standard were applied to other constitutional rights, no one would be left to enforce them.
Part two of a four-part series on the history of the cypherpunk movement
"If you're on that registry, you're bad."
Such theories are not based in fact.
The Texas senator notes the opposing party's blind spots on freedom of speech and the right to arms.
He seems open to materially increasing Internet service and content providers' liability for libels posted by their users, and based on other user misconduct.
"I believe that I'm channeling my ancestors," says Second Amendment activist Brent Holmes, who carries an assault rifle to protests in Richmond, Virginia.
A good illustration of the modern rule, which allows some permanent injunctions against repeating specific statements found to be libelous at trial—but only after such a finding on the merits.
Inspired by Germany's notorious hate-speech law, more countries seek to impose steep penalties on platforms that don't comply with their censorship whims.
An Ohio judge suggests the answer should be "yes," and an Ohio statute seems to require that when Facebook employees learn of specific felonies revealed by posts that they might be monitoring for some reason.
Here are some ways to build a campus culture more open to free inquiry and discourse.
Plus: Trump says he plans to hold rallies despite lack of negative COVID-19 test, Biden won't answer question on court-packing, and more...
Improving diversity is a worthy endeavor. But compelled “diversity statements” are a form of social engineering that, ironically, can be exclusionary.
Plus: Tech companies respond, proposed H-1B visa changes, and more...
Most things faculty publish don’t lead to a backlash. But that doesn’t mean that there’s not an academic freedom problem.
Two courts say COVID-19 lockdowns in Michigan and Pennsylvania were unconstitutional.
These beliefs shouldn’t be considered the only legitimate way to see the world.
Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito worry about the future of religious freedom. That’s not the same as a call to overturn the decision.
The dynamics of the information ecosystem have impacted research and teaching.
Profs. Ilana Redstone and John Villasenor are guest-blogging this week about their new book.
A federal district court rejects the argument that the documentary will violate trade secret rights related to "a long-lost photograph that purportedly depicts Abraham Lincoln lying wounded on the night of his assassination."
As usual, at this point in the litigation the key questions focus on procedure.
The injunction, the court held, is an unconstitutional prior restraint.
And that's true even if state graffiti law provided probable cause for the arrest, so long as there's evidence that chalking with other messages almost never leads to arrests.
Regina Ip spins a fantasy of a just government restoring order to Hong Kong.
The 7th Circuit judge’s track record suggests she would frequently be a friend of civil liberties.
Leaders of the organization reportedly see this as tacit approval.
An interesting decision, on a motion for default judgment.
Selling weapons to the UAE would stamp brutality and extremism abroad with American approval.
Why does media coverage conclude the problem is that the government hasn’t done a good enough job of spying?
(at least unless she gets case-by-case permission to enter that property). But a federal district judge has correctly held that this likely violated the First Amendment.
The opinion, which suggests a strong concern about due process, will nevertheless be cited as evidence of the SCOTUS nominee's "uniformly conservative" record.
Politicians are poised to tighten the screws, even though voluntary action offers more promise.
"The Croziers allege that the teacher 'lied to intentionally defame and label A.C. as a 'racist who said the N-word.'"
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.