Gun Control

March For Our Lives Calls for Confiscating Guns, Investigating the NRA, and 'Reforming' the Supreme Court

The gun control group's new policy proposal is radical, intersectional, and deeply contradictory.

|

March For Our Lives wants sweeping gun control, and a lot of other things too. On Wednesday, the group released its Peace Plan for a Safer America with the ambitious goal of reducing gun deaths and injuries by 50 percent in 10 years.

"You see these shootings on TV every day and very little happening around it. It's painful to watch," David Hogg, a survivor of the 2018 Parkland shooting and co-founder of March For Our Lives, told the Washington Post. "I think that this plan is something that we can truly—as a country and as Americans united against violence and fighting for peace—can get behind."

The plan Hogg expects the country to get behind includes radical changes to America's gun laws, the federal government, and the U.S. Constitution itself. It would start by creating a national gun licensing system.

"It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a firearm as it is to buy and transfer an automobile," reads the plan before going on to describe a licensing system that would be far more onerous than anything that currently exists for owning a car.

A person looking to get a firearm license would have to go through an in-person interview, provide personal references, and complete "rigorous" gun safety training. Law enforcement bodies would oversee this process, and applicants would have to re-complete it annually in order to maintain a license.

Once an applicant secures one of these federal gun licenses, they will have to pay unspecified licensing fees that would pay for the costs of this national licensing system and also pay for the general costs of gun violence.

Higher fees would be charged for bulk purchases of ammunition and firearms, which seems somewhat redundant given that people would be limited to one gun purchase a month. Online sales would be banned and a 10-day waiting period for gun sales would be imposed.

The types of firearms one could purchase would also be restricted. Both "assault weapons" and "high-capacity magazines" (two terms which go undefined in the March For Our Lives plan) would be banned. Products that fit those descriptions that are currently in private hands would be subject to confiscation through a mandatory gun buyback program.

In addition to these direct limitations on gun ownership, the Peace plan would also beef up the federal bureaucracy's ability to go after gun owners. A new National Director of Gun Violence Prevention position would be created. This director would report directly to the president and coordinate a multi-agency response to halving gun deaths and injuries over 10 years.

The March For Our Lives proposal also calls on state and local authorities to go beyond federal efforts and pass their own, stricter gun laws.

Civil libertarians might be concerned that creating an onerous national licensing system, banning common weapons already in circulation, and then directing the federal government to enforce all these new laws might make criminals out of millions of responsible gun owners.

To assuage these fears, the March For Our Lives plan also includes a few planks intended to deal with the "intersectional dimensions of gun violence." The group's new gun violence czar would work with local police departments "to better train officers in implicit bias, conflict resolution, and crisis intervention."

Incredibly, their plan seems to assume that the more gun laws we have, the less policing we'll need.

"The more successful we are with stronger gun policies, the fewer firearms enter the illegal market, and the lower the footprint of the criminal justice system in people's lives," reads the March For Our Lives plan. Perhaps we could also reduce the number of narcotics officers by more zealously prosecuting the drug war?

By suggesting we can have strict gun control and enhanced civil liberties protections, March For Our Lives ignores the history of New York City's 'stop-and-frisk' program that was intended, in part, to get more guns off the streets, but ended up providing police with a legal justification for routinely harassing and humiliating the city's black and brown residents.

A few constitutional sticklers might point out that most of what the March For Our Lives folks want to do would be open to constitutional challenges. Others might say it's politically unrealistic.

Not to worry! March For Our Lives has a plan for that, too.

On the political side of things, the group calls for crushing the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA, their plan says, should have its tax-exempt status investigated by the IRS, and its campaign donations investigated by the Federal Election Commission.

The landmark D.C. v Heller Supreme Court decision, which confirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to gun ownership, would be "reexamined" by the Department of Justice, and more federal judges skeptical of gun rights would be appointed.

This Peace proposal also calls for having a national conversation about reforming the Supreme Court in order to prevent "partisan political influence and interference"—i.e. decisions protecting gun rights.

March For Our Lives' single-minded focus on reducing the number of guns in America ignores the fact that violent crime rates have fallen to record low levels across much of the country even as the number of guns and gun owners has increased dramatically.

The specific policy interventions its calls for, from assault weapons bans to expanded background checks, would do little to deter violence. Their plan is also hopelessly contradictory by promising both criminal justice reform and a sweeping array of new violations for which Americans can be arrested and imprisoned.

NEXT: New Survey Data Confirm That Opioid Deaths Do Not Correlate With Pain Pill Abuse or Addiction Rates

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I am making 10,000 Dollar at home own laptop .Just do work online 4 to 6 hour proparly . so i make my family happy and u can do

    ……. Read More

    1. As abolitionists go, March For Our Lives has its priorities wrong-

      Lawyers belong at the head of the queue, before guns and money.

      1. Jesus. Seeing your name brought back memories of HA. When it was still good.

    2. Secretive warfare training being staged in 21 North Carolina counties, Army says

      The students will match wits with more seasoned soldiers, who will “act as realistic opposing forces and guerrilla freedom fighters,” officials said in a release.

      Interesting choice of words to train US Special Forces to fight and kill guerillas who support freedom.

      1. Robin Sage is the capstone exercise of Army special forces training and has been for some time, so this exercise is a regular occurence in NC counties that are relatively close to Ft. Bragg. A few years ago some of the participants confronted a sheriff’s deputy who was not up to speed that the exercise was ongoing. The soldiers were using weapons with blank suppressors and the officer shot and killed both of them. Putting the message that the exercise is occuring in the media is part of the effort to try and make sure that never happens again.

      2. Opposing forces AND guerilla freedom fighters. The SF will be helping the guerillas.

  2. This Peace proposal also calls for having a national conversation about reforming the Supreme Court in order to prevent “partisan political influence and interference”—i.e. decisions protecting gun rights.

    How the hell can a majority of justices deciding a question be “interference?” They interfere with themselves?

    Oh, I know the answer–any result that reduces state power is nefarious “interference.”

    1. Oh, I know the answer–any result that reduces state power is nefarious “interference.”

      Any result that reduces state power dedicated for their own explicit purposes. That’s the difference.

      They’re basically demanding that teacher do something about those meanies who won’t share.

    2. Citizens forming organizations to petition the courts and congress is inappropriate political interference. But talking about changing the court in a highly partisan political way in order to get a desired outcome isn’t political interference at all. Makes sense.

  3. A bunch of children propose regulations that display the same low future time orientation and solipsistic mindset as a child.

    1. “A bunch of children propose regulations that display the same low future time orientation and solipsistic mindset as a child.”

      I see why those kids ALL vote Democrat. Universally. Not a kid in that group who doesn’t.

      1. Yep-just like the kid who brought on the plastic straw bans because they are killing the sea turtles. If you want a law passed, you really must enlist the kiddos. However, do not expect them to help if you want to get a law repealed. Kids only seem to want to expand the power of the state.

      2. Seems another young man, a former student of that same Parkland High School, who was actually THERE when the shooting happened, and actually lost some dear friends in the massacre, has come out in favour of training then allowing teachers and adult staff who want to, to carry on the job at school. That man has been shoved off into the corners because he is not a useful idiot like HoggBoyy is… his plan (the training and arming of teachers at school) has been effective in Ohio and some other states.. over two thousand school districts have put such plans in place and in the five or six years since that programme began NOT ONE FIREARM INCIDENT has been recorded in ANY school in those districts.
        Solid proof of a working cure is in existence, yet HoggBoy continues to stump for total disarmement of the 109,999,975 or so armed citizens across the land who have never shot an innocent person.

        HoggBoyy is the classic mental case, enabled and abetted by a very comfortable iving handed him, and plenty of time in the limelight.

    2. Did you just call Boss Hogg solipsistic? You take that back before I was your mouth out with soap.

      I looked it up. I still don’t know what it means.

      1. It means you think that you are the only thing that’s real.

        1. What a solipsistic definition of the word.

    3. This was inevitable. Those kids ain’t the ones who came up with crappy non-solutions like monthly lockdown drills and memes like ‘good guy with gun’.

      Proposing yet more crappy feel-good non-solutions just sends a wonderful confirmation signal — yes America, your children are as stupid and self-absorbed as you are.

      1. Demanding a solution assumes there’s a problem.

        This shit’s been going on in the inner cities for decades. It didn’t become a “problem” until autistic white people started acting like ghetto thugs.

  4. “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a firearm as it is to buy and transfer an automobile.”

    “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a gallon of gasoline ….”

    “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a fifth of vodka ….”

    “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a pack of cigarettes ….”

    “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a violent video game ….”

    “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a pornographic novel ….”

    “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a butcher knife ….”

    1. What they really want:

      “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a firearm as it is to buy and transfer a nuclear weapon.”

    2. “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a firearm as it is to buy and transfer an automobile.”

      I can buy a and transfer any car, without regard to size, weight, length, capacity, speed, or safety, to virtually anyone I like without a background check or driver’s license.

      It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a firearm to ISIS as it is to buy and transfer an automobile to ISIS.

      1. It is a formulation that is only bounded on one side. The relative ease of transferring a car is the minimum, the maximum is unlimited.

  5. “The landmark D.C. v Heller Supreme Court decision, which confirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to gun ownership, would be “reexamined” by the Department of Justice, and more federal judges skeptical of gun rights would be appointed.”

    The mask has fully slipped off, you fucking idiot authoritarian assholes.

    1. *Slips the judge $100* Keep it fair, keep it fair.

    2. I’d say it already fully slipped off, when the Gangrene New Deal was proposed. (Of course it was only hanging by a thread at that point, anyway.)

    3. The mask has fully slipped off, you fucking idiot authoritarian assholes.

      At this point the masks are getting a bit Clouseau-esque.

  6. YAWN. When will these dim-witted, unschooled anti-gun nuts come up with something new and interesting? Oh wait, I think I just answered my own question.

  7. The gun control group’s new policy proposal is radical, intersectional, and deeply contradictory.

    Like “right-wing extremism”, it’s hard to see how this is “radical” when a large chunk of the electorate subscribes to outlawing guns and doing away with the 2nd Amendment.

    Oh, sure, they’ll all insist they’re not for outlawing guns altogether and they only want “reasonable, common sense” gun laws, but dig a little deeper and you’ll find that their definition of “reasonable, common sense” gun laws is “whatever it takes to stop people from killing each other” – and there isn’t any law on Earth capable of stopping people from killing each other. Whatever gun laws they get, there will be immediate calls for more and every step of the way to a total ban on weapons of any sort whatsoever will be accompanied by the plea for “reasonable, common sense” laws.

    1. Explains why the 10,000 gun laws already on the books are not sufficiently “reasonable, common sense”.

      1. I’d like to ask any of the grabbers:

        Background checks do stop people from getting guns illegally.

        So…why are NONE of those people ever prosecuted for trying to illegally obtain a firearm?

        What good are more laws if the ones there aren’t actually enforced?

        1. I recall Vice President Joe Biden being asked that, and the answer from the Obama Administration seemed to be that if the sale was stopped, the law worked. End of story.

          I wondered if the lack of prosecutions for perjury for every single blocked sale had more to do with hiding the number of blocked sales that were later reversed by a bureaucratic ‘never mind’ or a judge’s finding of fact.

      2. That’s not enough, need 10,001.

    2. “a large chunk of the electorate subscribes to outlawing guns and doing away with the 2nd Amendment.”

      ~161 million members of the electorate voted in the 2016 election.
      ~103 million Americans own guns, and I suspect you will find a rather larger number disposed to defend and uphold the Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment .

      1. It may be a large chunk, but I don’t think it’s close to a majority nationally. Certainly not close to an electoral college or Senate majority.

    3. And banning guns certainly doesn’t work. Look at Japan. Hardly anyone has a gun, yet they still manage to have horrific mass murders at a similar rate to the US.

      1. And their suicide rate is significantly higher. Suicide is another issue that they push as a reason for making guns harder to get.

  8. Seems about as well thought out and realistic as a candidate for school president’s pledge that the drinking fountains will all dispense Coke if you just put him in charge.

  9. shoulda focus-grouped “March for Our Lives” … sounds like structured retreat

    1. Sounds like anti-Japanese racism to me.

    2. +10

      That is hilarious.

  10. The group’s new gun violence czar would work with local police departments “to better train officers in implicit bias, conflict resolution, and crisis intervention.”

    …whilst battering down your door and removing your 2A contraband.

    1. The Doctor and/or a rock band.

  11. “It should at least be as difficult to buy and transfer a firearm as it is to buy and transfer an automobile,”

    So I walk in, throw some money on the table, tell them I want one with everything, and I’m out the same day without a background check and no seven day waiting period.

    I’m good with that.

    1. You can order one off the internet and it is delivered to your house or you can pick it up at the vending machine.
      The future look bright for the gun industry.

      1. They’ll call it “Gunvana”?

      2. Resurrect Sears. I want to order one from their catalog, after looking at the scantily clad models in the under garment section.

    2. So I walk in, throw some money on the table, tell them I want one with everything, and I’m out the same day without a background check and no seven day waiting period.

      Buy a dozen cars and bitch about your ex-wife and co-workers the whole time, note that they’ll be sorry the next time they see you driving around in one of them, and *still* walk out same day and without a background check.

    3. you don’t even have to have drivers license to buy a car

      1. I thought you did– if you’re the primary driver or present yourself as the primary driver.

        (disclaimer: I don’t buy a car very often– only two new in my entire lifetime and I’m no spring chicken. At some point during the last sale I had to present my driver’s license– and I didn’t do financing, I threw them a duffel bag full of unmarked bills so it wasn’t for financing or loans).

        1. It’s because you’re not taking advantage of the “Used Car” loophole.

          1. That’s one way you can acquire a fully automatic assault car without a background check.

        2. The license is only needed if you’re going to drive it on public roads. If you’re just going to be driving around your backyard, or keeping the car stored away as a collectible, no license required.

          1. License is required I’d you get a loan because the need you to prove you will get car insurance which needs in general a license to get.

  12. national conversation

    Whenever someone tells you we need a “national conversation” on something, knuckle up.

    1. And why is it that these “conversations” only ever involve listening on my part.

  13. The landmark D.C. v Heller Supreme Court decision, which confirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to gun ownership, would be “reexamined” by the Department of Justice

    Ooh! Can we “reexamine” Roe v Wade and Obergefell too?

    1. Does he think the DOJ can trump SCOTUS?
      I’m sure Barr would be down with that, RBG? Not so much.

      1. Yeah did any adults read this crap before these children released it? How exactly does the DOJ overrule SCOTUS?

        1. It’s obvious they are will to accept a dictator as long as it’s the right one.

        2. Define “adult.”

        3. By recommending the appropriate 10 new Justices to put on the Court when they pack it, I assume.

          Or maybe I’m giving them too much credit for wanting to nominally act within the law. The DOJ could also overrule the Court by lining them up against a wall and shooting them. I suspect there’s a lot of lining up and shooting in this plan at some point.

  14. A new National Director of Gun Violence Prevention position would be created. This director would report directly to the president and coordinate a multi-agency response to halving gun deaths and injuries over 10 years.

    Just roll it into the new Department of Peace and I can see all of this working. Nothing like an agent from the Department of Peace sending out armed troops to confiscate all the firearms.

    1. *PA voice* “This is the department of peace, we have you surrounded. Come out with your hands up”.

      1. Peace sells, who’s buying?

        1. Megadeth fans?

  15. Iron law:

    Get Politics Out of the Way == Do it my way with no disagreement.

  16. Once an applicant secures one of these federal gun licenses, they will have to pay unspecified licensing fees that would pay for the costs of this national licensing system and also pay for the general costs of gun violence.

    In other words, only rich people will be able to legally own a gun. I guess they’ve shed their egalitarianism.

    1. also pay for the general costs of gun violence

      In other words, legal gun owners are collectively responsible for violent criminals.

      1. To avoid the moral hazard of passively subsidizing gun violence you’ll be doing it actively and against your will.

      2. legal gun owners are collectively responsible for violent criminals

        And suicides. Don’t forget the suicides.

    2. Sounds exactly like egalitarian end goals.

  17. Little known fact – Noted firearms expert Michael Hihn has a stroke book filled with pics of David Hogg.

  18. I do find it interesting that a kid who was let down by several government agencies thinks government is the answer.

    1. If only they’d had the right Top Men.

    2. Let down? You kidding me?! Hogg was nowhere near the shooting, and used the mistakes of those government agencies to launch himself straight into the limelight. They made him into a national figure and secured him a spot at Harvard that he otherwise wouldn’t have been qualified for. The shooting was the best thing that ever happened to that shit stain.

      1. Hogg was nowhere near the shooting
        We’re all survivors.

  19. On the political side of things, the group calls for crushing the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA, their plan says, should have its tax-exempt status investigated by the IRS, and its campaign donations investigated by the Federal Election Commission.

    For the comparatively small amount of money they contribute relative to other organization, the NRA is both feared and reviled. The NRA’s voting block punches above its weight.

    And these idiots don’t realize that there are other gun owners organizations.

    1. Organizations that actually defend the 2A, rather than using it as a fear-tactic to raise money for fancy wardrobes and vacations.

    2. “”And these idiots don’t realize that there are other gun owners organizations.””

      What they don’t realize is that it’s not about the organizations. It’s about all the gun owners that vote.

    3. Fun fact for those kiddies who are evidently illiterate.
      The NRA is not a tax exempt organization. Specifically to avoid all the ‘imperial entanglements’.
      I guess their search engines have the socialist filter turned on.

      1. NRA-ILA, the lobbying and political action part, is not tax exempt.

        The tax exempt part of the NRA teaches gun safety, hunter safety, trains and certifies firearms instructors, runs a museum, supports historical research. etc.

        LBJ through Joseph Tydings tried to shut down the NRA when the 1968 GCA did not include national gun registration (NRA testfied against the Joseph Tydings bill which failed to pass); in revenge the Johnson administration went after the NRA to pull its tax exempt status so NRA decided to create a political action arm and register it with Congress Dec 1968 as a lobby separate from the educational association for gun owners and hunters.

  20. Dammit I thought Hogg had faded into obscurity…

    1. He’s used up his 15 minutes and now he’s hogging somebody else’s.

    2. That’s why he’s being so extremist and irrational, he’s an attention whore and talking crazy gets you attention. Just not the good kind.

    3. He is the poster buy for raising the voting age to 30 or so.

  21. David Hogg, a survivor of the 2018 Parkland shooting

    *barf*

  22. “David Hogg, a survivor of the 2018 Parkland shooting”

    Hey, so did I! By the same method of not being there!

    1. He was there.

      But if I read this correctly, he was filming interviews about gun control DURING the shooting.

      https://www.factcheck.org/2018/04/david-hogg-at-school-during-parkland-shooting/

      1. You read correctly.

        “Once we were all in the room and we started seeing the headlines, we realized this was anything but a drill — this was life or death,” Hogg said in a MSNBC interview the day after the shooting. “And that actually was when I started recording. Because I realized that if I died, and if everyone else around me died, I wanted to have our voices heard.”

        1. Which sounds like a nice idea. But does he really think that views on gun control are the most valuable things those people could have left behind?
          And it sounds like he already wanted to be an anti-gun activist and leaped at his chance.

        2. Riiiiight. This bony little prick was terrified of dying so he created a last will and testament, if you will. Because as we all know, when faced with imminent death, we all have foresight to tape a manifesto instead of looking for a way out and pouring piss out of our boots. Give me a fucking break!

      2. Was David Hogg in Building Twelve?

        Where non-student Nickolaus Cruz was allowed to walk in carrying a rifle case while the Broward Couty Sheriff’s Office set up a 500 ft perimeter for officer safety giving Cruz free hand while students and teachers were being shot?

        Was David Hogg in Building Twelve?

  23. “Incredibly, their plan seems to assume that the more gun laws we have, the less policing we’ll need.”

    As none of these laws will affect them, criminals applaud the efforts of these prigs to make America a predator safe hunting ground.

  24. And licensing regs and fees that mean only rich white liberal cocksuckers can own guns. FOUND THE RACISTS!

  25. Here’s the actual threat:

    They know they can’t get all of this. So they’ll “settle” for mandatory “background checks” and confiscation orders, against those horrible, evil, Russian-controlled NRA mass-murderers who secretly control Congress. And nothing will improve.

    And they’ll pull the same shit again next year, and get confiscation orders based on anything you’ve ever posted online that the “gun czar’s” office doesn’t like. And nothing will improve.

    And they’ll do it again, and get a law that claims that gun violence is so important that we can’t let that pesky 2nd Amendment (sic) get in the way of mandatory annual searches of everyone’s house.

    And then it will be a crime to even talk about guns (oh, wait, THEY’VE ALREADY FOUND JUDGES TO ORDER THAT.)

    And this is why I can’t say the next obvious comment, without going to jail for doing so.

  26. The *second* you advocate enforcing a law about ownership with jail, you have ceded any claim to wanting to *reduce* violence: jail *is* violence, while ownership is not.

    #NonInitiationOfViolencePrinciple

  27. These children are uneducated monsters. HARD pass.

  28. I think Kurt Schlichter novels have the right idea. Let’s just split the country up now. These people can have their Leftist hell somewhere else.

    1. No thank you, because I’ll probably end up trapped behind the Iron Curtain.

    2. Why give progressives anything? Just throw them all out. If they don’t like it, what are they going to do? They’re just a bunch of weak soyboys anyway.

      1. What could possibly go wrong with an ideological purge?

  29. Those who are unwilling to protect and defend their lives, freedoms, rights and property will inevitable and deservedly lose them.

  30. “March For Our Lives Calls for Confiscating Guns, Investigating the NRA, and ‘Reforming’ the Supreme Court.”

    Also, March for Our Lives wants everyone to wear jackboots and Brown Shirts, have rallies back in the good ol’ Nurnberg, round up all the undesirables, stoke up the ovens and fanatically follow the fascist leader of their choice.
    Then, and only then, we all enjoy the fruits of freedom given to us by the fascist elites this organization covets.

  31. REASON! Show some journalistic integrity instead of following the pack! “through a mandatory gun buyback program”. You cannot “buy back” something you never owned. Call it “compensated confiscation” or “government purchase” or even “eminent domain condemnation of private property”. Whatever, IT AIN’T A BUYBACK.

    And while you’re at it, start substituting “big ol’ scary black guns” for “so-called ‘assault weapons'”.

    1. Well, good, someone found something incoherent to bitch about.

  32. Given the distribution of crime in this country, any enforcement efforts will have to be similarly distributed. This will run smack into their dislike of “over policing” neighborhoods primarily inhabited by “minorities” and “people of color”.
    Homicide prevention efforts will have to be evenly applied across city neighborhoods. This means that in Chicago, Uptown and West Ridge will have to have the same proportion of crime reduction efforts applied as Englewood and Austin.

    1. Ah, but when they ban unlicensed guns and criminalize their possession, then the distribution of crime will look rather different.

  33. Read the headline – Check
    Saw a pic of a sphincter with a microphone – Check
    There are Protesting Haters and there are Revisionist Haters
    for Everything else, there is a “GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!”
    Progressives, they are everywhere you don’t need them to be!

  34. That was one of the most compelling cases for gun ownership I have ever read.

    1. He’s a mole on the payroll of the Gun Sellers of America.

  35. “Once an applicant secures one of these federal gun licenses, they will have to pay unspecified licensing fees that would pay for the costs of this national licensing system and also pay for the general costs of gun violence.”
    Having people who have a legitimate licenses pay for “general costs” of illegal activities seems to beg the question. It assumes that gun ownership is somehow complicit in gun violence. That is how anti-gun activists seem to think, but I’d prefer my laws be based on actual reality.

    1. Considering that, under the Green New Deal, anyone who uses a gas stove, gas heat, or a charcoal grill will be complicit in global warming, it’s not much of a stretch.

  36. From the “Peace Plan for a Safer America…

    “In addition, we would expand prohibited categories for obtaining a gun license, with a focus on those with a propensity for violence. This would include: individuals with felony convictions, any level of domestic violence offenders (protective orders and misdemeanors), individuals with a documented history of violence, individuals convicted of hate crimes, individuals convicted of stalking…”

    Too bad that they don’t realize that these folks are pretty much already prohibited from gun possession by 18 USC 922 (g). Even worse is that Progressives demand laws that are already on the books, apparently just to generate outrage.

  37. There is a relatively short pier nearby where they could hold a long march…

  38. Chances are this guy will be transitioning to Daisy Soww in the near future.

  39. Well there is that thing called 2A

    1. WHAT WRECKINBALL IGNORES,

      As AUTHORITATIVELY EXPOUNDED by Justice SCALIA, the Second Amendment allows common-sense restrictions – but FASCISTS OF RIGHT AND LEFT ignore the TRUTH.

      LEFT MINUS RIGHT = A BIG ZERO, LOL

      1. Not taking the bait, eh?

        What, my Hihn wasn’t realistic enough for you?

  40. What a know nothing totalitarian twerp.

    With all the vetting to get a license limiting those who can have guns to the paragons of humanity, isn’t it odd that we still have to have all these paragons of humanity register all their guns?

    It’s almost as if there’s some *other* purpose he plans to make of all that registration information.

  41. All right, it’s officially time to set up a legal defense fund for whomever is arrested in the blunt instrument death of David Hogg.

    1. Enjoy that FBI visit, DRM.

  42. On the subject of guns and fake news a California news broadcast claimed a potential mass shooter had an illegal arsenal there is no such statute in California

  43. Awww, Hogg is so cute in his little black shirt.

  44. Sounds like March For Our Lives is on the right track.
    LastoftheShitferbrains hardest hit.

  45. So this HoggBoyy character is now listed as “a survivor”? I guess I am also a survivor of that school massacre as well, as I remember it happening and reading about it.

    Anyone else remember WHERE that creature was during the tnire shooting incident? He was a fwe miles away riding his bicycle.
    If he is a survivor of that massacr, the I’m a survivor of the crash of the Hindenberg Zeppelin.

  46. Will somebody please snap the neck of this little prick? And his typical FBI ‘father’? (must be one of those wonderful rank & file agents Hannity says are above reproach) Anybody advocating the overthrow of our Constitution is too stupid and dangerous to breathe.

  47. You just March yourself right back to your bedroom, young man! You can come out when you learn to respect the rights of others.

Please to post comments