Judge Upbraids UConn for Unfair Investigation
The university disallowed the testimony of witnesses who would have undermined the accuser's credibility.
The university disallowed the testimony of witnesses who would have undermined the accuser's credibility.
It’s all part of the international push by officials to monitor the public. You’re next.
The city's overzealous commission has ordered the company to stop selling dolls some said were racial caricatures.
"Say what you will about ISIS but at least they're not Islamophobic." Journalist Andrew Doyle has created the ultimate parody account.
If a motion to recuse argues that the judge has a conflict of interest because she owns particular property, can the judge order the redaction of all the details related to the location of the property?
Efforts to control the flow of information fail, but they muddle the quality of what people share in defiance of the censors.
"We need to stop this generation of big tech companies from profiting off of lies to the American people," the candidate told PEN America.
What’s at stake in Michigan v. Wood
A clear First Amendment violation, I think -- but it's the law in Tennessee.
Such inflammatory exaggeration seems designed to avoid a substantive discussion of the presidential candidate's gun control proposals.
The billionaire former three-term mayor of New York panders to Democratic loyalists rather than laying out a vision for a prosperous, tolerant America.
Online platforms would have to "earn" speech protections by compromising encryption—all in the name of fighting child porn.
GOP attacks on internet smut are heating up, but the porn industry has more practical threats to worry about.
40 privacy advocacy groups send open letter to agency
Plus: Santa Cruz decriminalizes shrooms, the feds target medical marijuana in Michigan, "the growing threat to free speech online," and more...
The attempted muzzling of the former national security advisor is dubious.
When politicians call to punish “disinformation,” we should worry about what that definition encompasses.
A century ago, the Wilson administration cracked down on immigrant anarchists. The raids lasted three months, and their impact was felt for decades.
The bill's requirements for "emergency" orders are loose, and it does not give respondents a right to a court-appointed lawyer.
Erroneous predictions of violence at the Richmond rally conflated civil libertarians with militant racists.
"Facial recognition represents a dystopic advancement of the police state."
That's the logical implication of a recent Second Circuit panel decision (though one involving a non-journalist).
A federal court has allowed the case to go forward, and is considering whether to preliminarily enjoin the restrictions.
orders university to temporarily reinstate accused student for Spring semester.
E-Verify makes life harder on immigrants who want to work, but it doesn't make things better for anyone—-even those who want to see those immigrants leave.
No, Californians aren't banned from showering and doing laundry on the same day. But the fact that so many people believed that lie says something about how insane the state's real water laws are.
A bipartisan coalition wants to restrain secret snooping and create more independent oversight of the secretive FISA Court.
Following an insider trading conviction and the collapse of his career, Damilare Sonoiki is suing Harvard.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is filing a defamation suit against Hillary Clinton
"I don't think you should do Twitter if you think you're better than Twitter."
The lawsuit might be good politics, but it's bad for free speech.
The article explains why the Supreme Court was justified in overruling longstanding precedent in this important recent constitutional property rights case.
Hundreds of police departments are using facial recognition technology without oversight.
Plus: Clinton says "nobody likes" Bernie, Biden wants Section 230 revoked, Iran takes responsibility for Jan. 8 plane crash, and more...
a good reason to repost Prof. Nicholas Johnson's guest-post on 2014, based on his book Negroes and the Gun.
A new story from Fox 11 (L.A.).
If politicians are going to paint their opponents as illegitimate, they should be prepared to receive the same treatment in return.
There is no easy way to determine whether someone is spending a lot on guns because they like guns or because they plan to commit an act of terror.
Some privacy activists say the bill still falls short.
The governor fears a gun-rights rally might turn violent; a judge refuses to stop him from barring weapons from the demonstration.
Biden tells the New York Times he would revoke Section 230 protections and hold Facebook (and other sites) liable for their content.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks