Should an Originalist Justice Support Overruling Kelo v. New London?
The general assumption that the Fifth Amendment bars takings for economic development purposes rests on shaky ground.
The general assumption that the Fifth Amendment bars takings for economic development purposes rests on shaky ground.
We can thank judges who were prepared to enforce constitutional limits on public health powers.
Glenn Reynolds suggests it's how that landmark decision was applied and expanded that has created the real problem.
The Court has "failed to justify our enacted policy," he wrote.
He repeats his concern that QI doctrine rests on "shaky ground" and imposes a "one-size-fits-all doctrine" that is "an odd fit for many cases," including those involving university administrators.
Salaythis Melvin's family says they want justice.
Six justices agreed that the state's "dragnet for sensitive donor information" imposes "a widespread burden on donors' associational rights."
We'll be ready to publish articles on this subject as early as September, if you submit them by August 1.
"The gravity of the privacy concerns in this [case] is further underscored by the [amicus briefs supporting the challenge].... [T]hese organizations span the ideological spectrum ...: from the [ACLU] to the Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund; from the Council on American-Islamic Relations to the Zionist Organization of America; from Feeding America—Eastern Wisconsin to PBS Reno."
Plus: How Trump lost in 2020, Amazon seeks recusal of FTC chair, and more...
The fees would be used to reimburse the city for the public costs of gun violence.
Civil liberties advocates call for a moratorium on federal facial recognition.
It's likely that soon, almost all Americans will be legally able to carry guns.
So holds a Fifth Circuit panel (by a 2-to-1 vote), in an assignment requiring the writing of the Pledge of Allegiance, but the same argument would apply, I think, to compelled statements of other ideologies, whether related to patriotism, race, sex, sexual orientation, or anything else.
The officers might receive qualified immunity, however.
The plaintiff is Francesca Viola, who wrote the comment when she was a journalism professor at Temple University.
"Bartolotti alleges that 'anytime you search [his] name on [the internet, he is] affiliated with this case,' which 'has affected [his] personal and professional lives [and] has become a safety issue at times as well.'"
The Court clarified that the challenged policy need only be a "de facto final" decision, and that property owners are not required to exhaust all possible state bureaucratic procedures before filing a federal takings case. The Court also emphasized that Takings Clause property rights have "full-fledged constitutional status."
"In what legal universe is it not even plausibly unreasonable to knowingly immolate someone?" asks dissenting judge
The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?
The suspension is based on "demonstrably false and misleading statements" that Giuliani made as Donald Trump's lawyer.
This is the case against DeRay Mckesson, brought by a police officer who was injured in a protest that Mckesson allegedly organized.
Baltimore kept tabs on citizens' movement across 90 percent of the city, without a warrant, to investigate crimes.
What seems like a gun rights case actually presents some important questions of administrative law.
Law enforcers have plenty of tools; they just want to paw through our data without effort or expense.
Cracking down on "rogue gun dealers" and enforcing background checks won't stop criminals from arming themselves.
No, it’s not an attempt to monitor faculty and student views. It’s an attempt to make sure they’re allowed to express them.
A way of warning someone they might feel offended is itself offensive?
The FBI provided "no factual basis for the seizure," Judge R. Gary Klausner wrote.
After Chinese authorities conducted newsroom raids and arrested top editors, pro-democracy publication Apple Daily realized it could no longer safely operate.
Once again, it shows just how hard it is to hold bad officers accountable.
Why is straight reporting on educational reform measures so difficult.
The article assesses today's important Supreme Court property rights ruling.
We'll be ready to publish articles on this subject as early as September, if you submit them by August 1.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks