The Gig Economy May Flourish Under Donald Trump - And That's a Good Thing
Letting workers and bosses come to terms is better than the government protecting old business models and raising prices.
Letting workers and bosses come to terms is better than the government protecting old business models and raising prices.
This after heavy-handed regulations pushed Uber out of the same market last year.
That allows for fair competition on a level playing field, and lets consumers choose which service they prefer.
Ride-sharing services weren't defendants in lawsuit brought by taxi driver union, but got slapped with a cease-and-desist order anyway.
Attempts by cabbies in Milwaukee and Chicago to crush competition from Uber-like services or more taxi drivers both shot down in federal court by Judge Richard Posner; Reason Foundation amicus brief relied on.
"People want to be able to press on their smartphone and request a ride," says commission chairman, stating the obvious.
Ride-sharing company stupidly attacked after prices went up in Manhattan area wracked by terroristic violence.
Two city aldermen say it's about protecting pedestrians, but it's really about protecting taxi companies.
What is not permitted is prohibited
Also, Uber self-driving project launches in Pittsburgh
Paging long-dead French economist Frederic Bastiat.
Uber and 385,000 drivers liked the deal, but Judge Edward Chen determined it was "not fair."
Ask not for whom the bell tolls, mass transit agencies of America.
Next generation of ride-sharing will make cities more efficient, solve mass transit problems.
Democrats think attacking the "gig economy" is a winning strategy. They're wrong.
The goal of the changes is to give drivers more control.
Study: Dem candidates spend more on ride-sharing than their GOP counterparts
Smart entrepreneurs can minimize pain caused by stupid governments.
The mess left in the wake of a battle with Uber and Lyft has city residents using illegal drivers to get around and officials considering dropping many rules
Democrats can fight the sharing economy-but they'll lose voters if they do.
City desire to fingerprint all drivers will drive the e-hailing companies out of the city.
Fee structures would be higher than for taxi drivers.
Surge pricing is a market mechanism, not an illegal pricing scheme.
Economists find more social benefits from ridehailing apps.
Can a truly peer-to-peer Ethereum-powered rideshare app beat the big guys: Uber and government?
Not waiting for Uber to stop moving before subsidizing it.
Government pretends it's the cause of progress, then it strangles innovation.
Ride-sharing companies simply don't control drivers like bosses control workers.
Screwed over in fees, when not being turned away due to racism.
The great taxi industry upheaval.
Salon praises the Germans' salutary fealty to rules, since it helped get rid of Uber.
Studies showing city folk getting better treatment.
Portsmouth, NH, not amused by Free State Project participant's plan to get around their anti-Uber regulations.
How might union worker protection policies work along with a community-rating app system?
Criticizing a company under constant political assault for its political hires is to mistake the defense for the crime.
Uber now trying to make its drivers all agree to a new arbitration clause.
Cops came to his door to nab the activist while he was out buying baby food for his child, due any minute.
The taxi cartel claims jobs will be lost, but the numbers don't add up.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks