Supreme Court Orders Oregon To Reconsider Gay Wedding Cake Case
SCOTUS wants to see anti-discrimination laws applied without religious bias.
SCOTUS wants to see anti-discrimination laws applied without religious bias.
After the state ends a lawsuit over a transgender celebration cake, the customer files her own civil claim.
'We know what we want to do with our bodies, and we don't need government interference.'
Here's why that's a bad idea—and it has nothing to do with God's wrath, women's rights rollbacks, or locker-room predators.
Some students at the University of the Arts want the firebrand feminist fired. Where did they get the idea they should be picking faculty?
Molly Jong-Fast, Phillip Klein, Rachel Lears, and Jaime Kirchick also join on channel 121 from 9-12 am ET. Call in to heckle at 1-877-974-7487!
Does current precedent forbidding discrimination on the basis of sex-based stereotypes apply here?
The Supreme Court allowed the policy to move forward, but the fight is far from over.
Paul Cadmus's Herrin Massacre is "The Painting Our Art Critic Can't Stop Thinking About." If only he'd thought harder.
A fight in England between educators and Muslims shows the need for more school choice, not control.
A state-level decision against the property owner shows the limits of the Supreme Court's wedding cake ruling.
But is it actually even needed?
President George W. Bush was once attacked by the same people for rejecting the very same policy.
Most politicians have evolved on gay issues. But not all were directly connected to anti-gay organizations.
On Monday, a federal appeals court considered Grindr's guilt in a case involving app-based impersonators.
The FDA' policy makes no exception for gay men who use condoms or are in monogamous relationships.
Is he rejecting a customer or rejecting a message? The difference matters.
His 16-year-old blog posts are completely irrelevant to his testimony on the minimum wage.
India is known as the land of contradictions, and recent events do little to undermine that reputation.
Yet under Chinese law, some rapists get only three years behind bars.
Justices are being asked yet again to argue about wedding cakes and whether the Civil Rights Act covers discrimination against gay and transgender people.
No, a baker cannot be compelled to "support gay marriage" with frosting.
An absurdly petty intersection of anti-gay and anti-foreigner policies.
A ban on gay sex dated back to 1861, when India was ruled by the British.
According to the official handling the teen's asylum application, his walk, dress, and actions proved he couldn't be gay.
Masterpiece Cakeshop is back with a new lawsuit over another rejection.
"Imagine: You're having sex with a consenting adult...and then you're arrested and held overnight, and your whole, entire life has been exposed on TV."
Despite its ruling in favor of a Colorado baker, the Court remains hostile to religious exemptions from anti-discrimination laws.
This 7-2 ruling is more about Colorado's biased enforcement of discrimination law than freedom of expression.
How prosperity, AIDS, and pop culture changed people's minds
Many aren't willing to ignore her ties to torture just because of her sex.
The MSNBC host kind of sucked on gay issues 10 years ago. So did most Democratic moderates.
Stop trying to draft me as a data point for your federal lobbying efforts.
Nobody has the right to force bakers to print speech they hate. The debate is over what counts as speech.
A third court disagrees. The Supreme Court had the chance to take on the case to resolve the conflict, but it declined.
School choice and cultural pressure are better than government mandates.
Eugene Volokh runs the most important legal blog in the country. Here's his take on gay wedding cakes, free speech, and President Trump's judicial appointments.
Lower courts are split on whether sex-based protections cover orientation.
Just when you thought you couldn't like Moore any less.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks