Montana Sets Itself Up for First Amendment Lawsuits With TikTok Ban
Plus: Americans are increasingly changing religions, court pauses rejection of "free" preventative care mandate, and more...
Plus: Americans are increasingly changing religions, court pauses rejection of "free" preventative care mandate, and more...
The amount of knowledge that's freely available on the internet is staggering. Politicians shouldn't try to restrict that.
The co-creator of Skype says yes. The George Mason University economist says no.
From Russiagate to COVID discourse, elites in government and the media are trying to control and centralize free speech and open inquiry.
Requiring users to verify their age to use social media will degrade their privacy and cybersecurity.
The Chinese app has become a magnet for every possible cultural concern.
A decade ago, online startups seemed poised to vanquish legacy media. That didn't happen.
Politicians attack social media for spreading conspiracies and so-called misinformation. But what about when social media helps someone become an NBA star?
An expanded surveillance state can’t solve problems created by drug prohibition.
Plus: Missouri attempts to ban gender transition treatments for adults, another bad social media bill hits Congress, and more...
A response to Professors Goldsmith & Volokh
Morgan Bettinger might sue the University of Virginia for violating her First Amendment rights.
Morgan Bettinger was accused on social media of telling protesters they would make good "speed bumps." It was more than a year before investigations cleared her.
The feds invoke national security to take away more of your rights and pretend they're keeping you safe.
Never underestimate officials’ ability to turn embarrassing moments into awful opportunities.
The bipartisan RESTRICT Act is an infringement on a host of civil and economic rights that will strangle free speech and cryptocurrencies.
Industrial policy is never as simple as it seems.
Plus: Tennessee drag law halted, the FTC's proposed ban on negative option marketing, and more...
Plus: States consider mandatory anti-porn filters, tariffs create baby formula shortages (again), and more...
After launching, ChatGPT hit 1 million sign-ups much faster than Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter did.
Which sentence in this podcast was generated using A.I.?
Plus: "Sensitivity readers" rewrite Agatha Christie, a Little Free Library battle, and more...
Plus: Theatrics at the House hearing on TikTok, doomsday merger predictions haven't panned out, and more...
TikTok's CEO served as little more than a punching bag for lawmakers with a dizzying array of big tech grievances.
The designer of China's Great Firewall sees new A.I. tech as a concern for public authorities.
Plus: Police sue Afroman for using footage from raid, California bill could ban popular junk foods, and more...
Momfluenced bemoans unrealistic expectations set on American mothers but then establishes new ones.
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
While the FDA keeps experimental treatments out of reach, the spoonie world makes a diagnosis into an identity.
Turning every streaming service into TikTok is bad for the internet. It'll be disastrous for music.
The trade association says the overbroad and vague A.B. 2273 places unconstitutional burdens on speech.
State legislators "have independent agency to do things. I don't control every single bill that has been filed," said DeSantis on Tuesday.
While Sohn’s record raises ethics and judgment questions, some attacks against her lacked merit.
Plus: U.S. special forces seeks “next generation” deepfake tech, the economic cost of the PRO Act, and more…
Plus: The SAFE TECH Act, Reason talks to young conservatives at CPAC, and more...
The latest bid to amend Section 230 would threaten free speech and creators' ability to monetize content while also subjecting tech companies to a flood of frivolous lawsuits.
In Meme Wars, so-called "disinformation" experts call for the suppression of more ideas and speakers to protect democracy.
A senator, a state attorney general, and a former congressman excoriated the law while getting much of it wrong.
Attempts to reclassify ISPs as common carriers are unsupported by law.
The Court’s decisions in Gonzalez and subsequent cases could lead to impossible, incompatible consequences.
When society criminalizes outdoor independence, it makes smart phone addiction more likely.
Net neutrality is an unnecessary and failed policy.
The Supreme Court’s newest member weighs in on the meaning of Section 230 in Gonzalez v. Google.
Plus: The National Endowment for Democracy ends funding of conservative media blacklist, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear major internet free speech case, and more...
Section 230 helped the internet flourish. Now its scope is under scrutiny.
"Today's decision is a victory for the First Amendment that should be celebrated by everyone who hopes to see the internet continue as a place where even difficult and contentious issues can be debated and discussed freely," said one attorney.
When COVID-19 and the U.S. government stopped kids from seeing each other, social media was their lifeline.
Gonzalez v. Google presents the Supreme Court’s first opportunity to weigh in on Section 230.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks