The FBI Paid Twitter $3.4 Million for Processing Requests
The latest Twitter Files installment shows the FBI paid Twitter millions of dollars to cover the costs of processing the agency's requests. Yikes.
The latest Twitter Files installment shows the FBI paid Twitter millions of dollars to cover the costs of processing the agency's requests. Yikes.
Demands by lawmakers and government officials for locally produced content may lead to online censorship.
Plus: Sen. Mike Lee wants to remove First Amendment protections for porn, IRS doxxes taxpayers, and more...
Antitrust regulators don't seem to understand how the video game industry works.
Plus: Justin Amash and Jane Coaston talk about the Libertarian Party, a fatal flaw in anti-vaping studies, and more...
The lawsuit alleges that TikTok's algorithm funnels inappropriate content directly to teens. That not only defies logic, but it is also antithetical to how a social media platform keeps users.
Plus: ACLU sides against religious freedom, abortions after Dobbs, and more...
"The state of New York can't turn bloggers into Big Brother, but it's trying to do just that," said FIRE attorney Daniel Ortner.
A million hypotheticals bloom in arguments over when and where the government may compel speech.
Plus: Freedom's Furies, SCOTUS to take up student loan forgiveness plan, and more...
At a dangerous moment for the free exchange of ideas, civil libertarians can tally a win.
Plus: Court rejects Biden plea on student loan plan, Ohio cops don't understand the First Amendment, and more...
While "the 26 words that created the internet" have been under fire from both sides, two groups argue that the 1996 law is essential to the future of abortion rights.
Mastodon might not be the future of decentralized social media, but it can’t hurt to check it out as Twitter implodes.
The bill would amp up surveillance while doing little to actually protect anyone.
Plus: Congress remains too cautious about marijuana, myths about independent contractors, and more...
The crucial protector of internet speech might have some cracks in its armor.
In a post-FOSTA world, Section 230 still protects websites from lawsuits over criminal sexual conduct by their users.
On Tuesday, the senator erroneously claimed that "free speech does not include spreading misinformation."
Plus: Hate speech is free speech, tax gap is stable, and more...
The Network State author and serial entrepreneur on the future of freedom, online and offline.
The Network State author and serial entrepreneur on the future of freedom, online and offline.
"Sounds like a good reason to think twice about using PayPal," writes Eugene Volokh.
The return of the trollish forum demonstrates the futility of bans on bad speech.
While the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act was hailed as a victory for digital privacy, critics warn of a litany of unintended consequences.
The world’s politicians offer a friendly reception to attacks on free speech.
Plus: Lessons from the recovered memory movement, Texas fights to keep young adults from owning handguns, and more...
Getting the best information when we need it will likely always be a challenge, but the Reddit hack helps.
A crackdown on insults, hate speech, and misinformation punishes dissenters who express themselves in ways that offend government officials.
Jimmy Wales talks about why his online encyclopedia works, how to improve social media, and why Section 230 isn't the real problem with the internet.
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
Data collection is not the same as surveillance.
Proposed internet bans open a can of worms about how to punish those involved in creating and consuming controversial content.
Cloudflare's decision brings up fundamental questions about how internet infrastructure companies should operate.
Plus: Vermont city repeals prostitution ordinance, political correctness revisited, and more...
How do you justify government speech mandates? Apparently, you deliberately pretend that businesses have no right to control the messages they choose to present.
The innocuously-titled Online Safety Bill threatens citizens' rights to privacy and to speak freely.
Plus: A rebranded "Build Back Better," the two-party system creates "a disconnect between elites and non-elites," and more...
Plus: Arizona prisons censor The Nation, Facebook's feed changes, and more...
It's none of their business.
Dedication to free speech is in short supply around the world, with Britain and Canada previously considering similar bills.
We can make our voting systems just a bit dumber and a whole lot safer.
What happens when YouTube and Facebook can be held liable for their users’ speech?
Plus: Uvalde cops didn't check classroom door, Texas GOP slides further to the right, telemedicine deregulation in peril, and more...