Cops Who Beat a Man After Pulling Him Over for Broken Lights Receive Qualified Immunity
The victim will now have no right to argue his case before a jury in civil court.
The victim will now have no right to argue his case before a jury in civil court.
Bad news for hundreds of imprisoned defendants in Louisiana and Oregon
If the officer succeeds, the victim will not be allowed to sue on those claims.
Government officials who wield land grabs to pick economic winners and losers now want to use them to kill disfavored businesses.
The boy was sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment.
Progressive activists are pushing the 82-year-old justice to step down.
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States will examine “the membership and size of the Court.”
“An officer violates the Fourth Amendment if he shoots an unarmed, incapacitated suspect who is moving away from everyone present at the scene.”
Programs that keep sex offenders indefinitely confined face new challenges.
“It is not the role of the executive—particularly the unelected administrative state—to dictate” the terms of criminal law, said the 6th Circuit.
A federal judge protests the Supreme Court’s “rights-without-remedies” Bivens doctrine.
Plus: Mexico moves closer to legalizing marijuana, Facebook fights monopoly allegations, and more...
The Supreme Court delivers another blow to a victim of egregious police abuse.
All professions deserve the same constitutional protections that speech-heavy industries get.
"I've lost everything," says Vicki Baker.
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson denied qualified immunity to the officers involved in Patterson v. United States.
What to expect from Joe Biden’s pick for attorney general.
The unfolding legal saga of City of Hayward v. Stoddard-Nunez
Abrasive, tasteless, and uncompromising, Flynt undoubtedly made the world safer for speech of all varieties.
In 2014, Reason reported on the misbehavior of Rod Ponton, who has suddenly risen to internet stardom after being unable to turn off an adorable filter during an online legal case.
Fourth Amendment advocates prevail in Wingate v. Fulford.
The state used civil asset forfeiture to seize Tyson Timbs' car in 2013. His nightmare hasn't ended.
The warden at the center of the case was originally given qualified immunity.
A federal court said it did not violate her Fourth Amendment rights.
Justice Clint Bolick dissents in Arizona v. Mixton.
The Biden administration has just delivered its first disappointment to criminal justice reform advocates.
The incoming president can bring some much-needed professional diversity to the federal bench.
Is the chief justice just a politician in robes?
The Constitution “plainly makes the appointment of electors a state-by-state matter.”
A tentative decision from Los Angeles Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant is yet another rebuke of officials trying to reimpose March-style lockdowns on a skeptical public.
The PACER database is antiquated and expensive to access, and that's just the way the federal judiciary likes it.
The president and his allies keep losing election cases.
Is this the Supreme Court’s next big gun rights case?
The legal doctrine provides rogue government agents cushy protections not available to the little guy.
Garland’s judicial record is replete with deferential votes for police and prosecutors.
The legal doctrine is a free pass for rampant government abuse.
The newest lawsuit in Pennsylvania is a longshot attempt to argue that all mail-in voting is unconstitutional because it differs from traditional, in-person voting. It's likely to fail.
Americans likely learned very little about her judicial philosophy.
An appeals court upheld a rule by the Ohio Secretary of State to limit each county to just one ballot box, overturning a previous ruling that said more boxes were needed.
Plus: Pandemic brings rise in electronic ankle monitoring, a court rules on stimulus checks for incarcerated people, and more...
Whitmer helped spark a national debate over the limits of executive power.
If confirmed, she would cement a strong 6-3 conservative majority.
Even the most police-skeptical courts grant the doctrine in egregious circumstances.
"I believe there is sufficient evidence of a clearly established Fourth Amendment violation," writes the dissenting judge.
Tennessee's requirement that barbers have at least a high school education is "unconstitutional, unlawful, and unenforceable," ruled the state's Chancery Court.
"The Constitution says everyone is entitled to equal protection of the law—even at the hands of law enforcement," wrote Judge Carlton W. Reeves.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10