The Texas Abortion Ban Violates Conservative Principles
S.B. 8 relies on litigation tricks that conservatives have long condemned as a threat to the rule of law.
S.B. 8 relies on litigation tricks that conservatives have long condemned as a threat to the rule of law.
Yale Law School Prof. Cristina Rodriguez and I discussed this timely subject with host Stephen Henderson.
Plus: Millennial myth busting, McFlurry madness, and more...
Because the Supreme Court so far has not intervened, post-heartbeat abortions are now illegal in the Lone Star State.
Overheated rhetoric is a ploy to treat migrants like enemy combatants.
The Third Amendment Lawyers Association argues in a recent amicus brief that the federal eviction ban requires landlords to quarter soldiers.
Plus: Wiretapping social media, Democrats' budget proposal, cryptocurrency regulations, the infrastructure bill, and more..
Fourth Circuit overturns laws barring licensed gun dealers from selling handguns to 18–20-year-olds.
“The fact that it hasn't ended in the past 230 years suggests that maybe [it will] last a good deal longer,” says historian Dennis C. Rasmussen, author of Fears of a Setting Sun: The Disillusionment of America's Founders
We can thank judges who were prepared to enforce constitutional limits on public health powers.
The controversial 2005 case "strayed from the Constitution," say Thomas and Gorsuch.
Holding a sign in a public park should not cause an arrest.
A new lawsuit challenges Minnesota's law requiring a person be at least 21 years old to carry a handgun.
A new conservative faction embraces "authoritative rule for the common good."
No, states can't use the 10th Amendment to overturn the First Amendment.
Police were finally able to catch the serial killer using DNA genealogy databases—violating many innocent people's constitutional right to privacy.
Revived federalism is a start, but it doesn’t go far enough.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments next term in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett.
Conservative state legislators are taking a page from the playbook of pro-immigration activists and the marijuana legalization movement.
The Founders could not have possibly imagined the Commerce Clause covering an eviction moratorium.
Plus: Wisconsin may approve microschools, what will Biden Title IX guidance look like, and more...
Texas state senators introduced a bill requiring the national anthem at all pro sports events.
Plus: A new documentary tells Reality Winner's story, occupational licensing reform is antitrust reform, and more...
Plus: Problems with the PRO Act, what libertarian feminism isn't, and more...
All professions deserve the same constitutional protections that speech-heavy industries get.
There are plausible arguments on both sides of the debate.
They also argue that the Senate has no authority to try a former president.
On the inconsistency between choice of law cases and interstate sovereign immunity cases
While many prominent constitutional scholars think trying a former president is perfectly legal, the dissenters make some points that are worth considering.
My recently published article on the NCC project outlines several important areas of agreement between conservative, libertarian, and progressive participants.
History and precedent both support impeachment trials for former federal officials.
Trump deserves to be remembered for what his words and actions have shown him to be.
Louis Gohmert asserts a previously overlooked power to decide which electoral votes will be counted.
That’s a rare position for modern White House residents, and not necessarily a popular one with the public.
A new book explicates the escaped slave and renowned orator's argument that the Constitution is "a glorious liberty document" that justified ending slavery.
Trump’s judicial humiliation is now complete.
The Constitution “plainly makes the appointment of electors a state-by-state matter.”
The NCC put together teams of conservatives, progressives, and libertarians to propose their own rewrites of the Constitution. All three teams came up with interesting ideas - and with some notable areas of agreement.
The escaped slave called the Constitution "a glorious liberty document" that justified extending equality to blacks and women.
Plus: Congress to vote today on marijuana decriminalization, new study shows bad news for indoor diners, and more...
One Ilya reviews a book written by another. Hopefully, this won't exacerbate #IlyaConfusion!
Is this the Supreme Court’s next big gun rights case?
Richard Epstein vs. Lawrence Lessig
Law professors Richard Epstein and Lawrence Lessig go head-to-head.
The Supreme Court nominee weighs in on a famous case.
Perhaps Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David Wecht ought to read more history, starting with the speeches of the late Rep. John Bingham.
Reviewing the record of the SCOTUS shortlister.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks