Does the Quality of Brief Writing Affect the Outcome of Supreme Court Decisions?
An interesting empirical study looks at whether better briefs lead to better outcomes.
An interesting empirical study looks at whether better briefs lead to better outcomes.
The hospital baselessly claimed the teenager's mother wrote the petition after she was fired without cause.
A federal court rejects challengers' Free Exercise Clause and parental rights claims.
Mug shots are not taken to humiliate a defendant before they've been convicted. But that's the purpose they widely serve now.
The opinion was decided July 21, but was originally issued sealed; it was just unsealed today, in response to my motion to unseal.
Season 1, Episode 4 Podcasts
"You need an argument for why this is good for society. That's important, but you also need money."
In last night's Republican presidential debate, candidates floated various forms of military action against drug cartels.
Legislators abuse the emergency label to push through spending that would otherwise violate budget constraints.
Further debate on textualism, "common good constitutionalism," and the classical legal method.
An emergency proclamation by Gov. Josh Green offers developers the opportunity to route around almost all regulations on building homes.
Plus: GOP hopefuls debate tonight, Canadian link tax backfires, and more...
A report reveals new draconian restrictions the 2024 frontrunner wants to implement, such as sea blockades in Latin America and "ideological screening" for migrants.
My amicus brief to the Third Circuit argues that the district court appropriately sanctioned the Philadelphia D.A.'s Office for making misleading representations about whether they had conferred with a crime victims' family.
Geoffrey Swenson’s book Contending Orders tackles Afghanistan and Timor-Leste.
While chalking on D.C. sidewalks and streets is illegal, the protesters say they were targeted for their beliefs.
While there is some genuine politicization, it is not as great as often claimed. Proposals to undermine judicial review could easily end up empowering the very sort of authoritarian president progressives fear.
Expect more strikes, fewer government services, and more tax increases to pay for pension obligations.
The guidelines would ignore decades of academic findings about how firm concentration can have a positive impact on consumers' welfare.
A fascinating new exploration of Frederick Douglass' constitutional thought.
S.B. 423 would prevent the state's powerful Coastal Commission from shooting down affordable housing projects that comply with local zoning laws.
Plus: Court urged to stop Arkansas' social media age verification law from taking effect in September, legalizing medical marijuana linked to lower insurance premiums, and more...
Trump and his acolytes' conduct was indefensible, but the state's RICO law is overly broad and makes it too easy for prosecutors to bring charges.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. Eastern for a live discussion with Jay Bhattacharya and John Vecchione about their legal case against the Biden administration.
Thankfully, you don't need fancy dining halls or a college degree to have a good life or get a good job.
Trump's Georgia indictment has much in common with the most recent federal case against him. But also breaks some new ground.
How Florida prison officials let a man's prostate cancer progress until he was paralyzed and terminally ill.
I was one of the critics he responded to, and in this post I offer a rejoinder.
Plus: A listener inquires about the potential positive effects of ranked-choice voting reforms.
Body camera footage shows that Delaware police cited Jonathan Guessford for flipping them off, even though they later agreed it was his right to do so
The judges recognize that Congress ended their ability to review the Mountain Valley Pipeline, but they seem none too happy about it.
Apparently $600 million to improve a very nice stadium isn’t enough.
End the government’s plea-bargaining racket with open and adversarial jury trials.
A federal judge ruled in favor of an Idaho death-row inmate who says that the state is "psychologically torturing" him.
The decision supports the notion that victims are entitled to recourse when the state retaliates against people for their words. But that recourse is still not guaranteed.
The injunction is the latest in a series of setbacks for the Biden administration's loan forgiveness agenda.
The lack of oversight and the general absence of a long-term vision is creating inefficiency, waste, and red ink as far as the eye can see.
Giving presidents impunity for using force and fraud to try to nullify election results is far worse than any potential risk of prosecuting Trump.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks