Trump Loves Accusing Critics of Treason. U.S. Law Makes That Charge Hard To Prove—for Good Reason.
The president’s habitual attempts to criminalize dissent hark back to tyrants of yore.
The president’s habitual attempts to criminalize dissent hark back to tyrants of yore.
Any self-styled advocate for limited government should be furious about Trump's $1.8 billion slush fund, but few Republicans are willing to denounce it.
After a magistrate judge said a DHS investigator had failed to establish probable cause, the government decided it did not need the YouTube and iPhone records after all.
A judge last week threw out a criminal indictment against him on the grounds that it was tainted by vindictiveness. But that same spirit infects another part of his story that few people have discussed.
The Trump administration invokes the notoriously vague FARA to threaten a critic.
Using taxpayer money to reward the president’s allies has nothing to do with the president's claims against the IRS.
Despite the administration's arguments, a multibillion-dollar settlement fund with no judicial oversight is fairly unprecedented.
In one lawsuit after another, the president has claimed damages in amounts completely disconnected from reality.
Even as the Justice Department files lawsuits aimed at vindicating gun rights, it undermines them in other cases.
While not groundbreaking, the regulatory shifts offer some welcome relief.
Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon argues that both laws violate the Second Amendment by banning arms in common use for lawful purposes.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche implausibly claims prosecutors can prove Comey "knowingly and willfully" threatened to murder the president.
The president is not shy about using government power to punish people for saying things that offend him.
The case defies more than half a century of rulings on the “true threat” exception to the First Amendment.
Such claims are hard for most defendants to prove. But most defendants haven't drawn the public ire of the president.
The brief, which asks a federal judge to reconsider an injunction blocking the project, reads like it was transcribed from the president's Truth Social account.
Even Republican critics of the Federal Reserve chairman's performance rejected the notion that he had broken the law by lying about the renovation of the central bank's headquarters.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's distinction between medical and recreational cannabis is hard to reconcile with the relevant scientific and statutory criteria.
Plus: skyway socialism, reconsider the lobster, D.C.'s urban growth, and more...
"The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence," said acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
The platform creators filed a lawsuit claiming their First Amendment rights were violated after the Trump administration convinced Apple and Facebook to remove their content.
The Justice Department is permanently blocked from prosecuting Californians who fail to register when the state no longer requires it.
After withdrawing a summons in the face of a legal challenge, the government is seeking a grand jury subpoena.
Plus: the insanity of investigating the NFL on antitrust grounds, and should golf be harder?
The feds have arrested an Army staffer who spoke to a journalist for a book about special operations. The journalist says it's retaliation for exposing corruption.
Plus: pro-tech media sells to big tech, Trump's new tariffs, jobs numbers, and more...
Ultimately, Bondi's fulsome defense of the president could not overcome blowback over her handling of the Epstein files.
The agency refused to prosecute alleged national security, labor, and white-collar crime while increasing immigration cases, a new report finds.
But for a fraudulent and misleading warrant affidavit, Taylor would not have been killed during a fruitless late-night drug raid.
The Trump administration wants its federal funding back from Harvard, alleging the Ivy League university did "nothing" about campus antisemitism.
“Officers don’t have the blanket authority to arrest anyone who runs from them,” says an attorney from the Institute for Justice.
Eight others were convicted on vague "terrorism" charges—causing serious concern among First Amendment advocates.
Fans are responsible for sky-high ticket resale prices, not primary ticket sellers.
The administration's capricious behavior underlies the inherent problem with giving a single person so much power.
The president's wildly inaccurate ideological labels are no more meaningful than his other ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with him.
A grand jury and a federal judge rejected the president’s vendetta against legislators who produced a video about the duty to refuse unlawful military orders.
Department of Homeland Security
The department's pattern of dishonesty supports a presumption of irregularity.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon notes that Sen. Mark Kelly's comments about unlawful military orders were "unquestionably protected" by the First Amendment.
A lawsuit argues that Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem coerced Apple and Meta to censor two popular ICE-monitoring tools, which violates Americans' right to freedom of expression.
Gail Slater resigned from her position as Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department's Antitrust Division after butting heads with Attorney General Pam Bondi over merger enforcement.
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi react to Pam Bondi’s explosive testimony, weigh in on A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, and argue over which state would be most libertarian if it seceded.
The Department of Justice released subpoenas for personal information on two anonymous commenters claiming to have inside knowledge about Jeffrey Epstein's death.
Rep. Thomas Massie explains why he is risking his political career over the Epstein files, details what he saw in the unredacted documents, and argues that the scandal reveals a bipartisan failure of accountability stretching across multiple administrations.
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
The federal case against the former CNN anchor hinges on conduct that can plausibly be viewed as part of a journalist's work, combined with the obvious partiality of that work.
To make sense of the Justice Department’s latest documents, you have to understand what they actually are.
Judge Sutton concludes there was not much to the complaint submitted by the Department of Justice.
A federal indictment accuses him and another journalist of conspiring with protesters who disrupted a St. Paul church service.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks