A New Name for ENRD at the Department of Justice
The division will be renamed the "Energy and Natural Resources Division."
The division will be renamed the "Energy and Natural Resources Division."
Eight of the Prairieland Detention Center protesters were sentenced to a combined 450 years in prison.
A new Office of Legal Counsel opinion says disparate impact rules pushed employers to treat workers as members of racial groups rather than individuals.
The DOJ's unilateral abandonment of the Anti-Weaponization Fund "makes it crystal clear that these parties were never adverse," the former judges argue.
The recently reintroduced American Innovation and Choice Online Act is a departure from America’s current antitrust regime, not an improvement.
The sweet deal that resolved the president's fatally flawed lawsuit against the IRS was business as usual at the DOJ, his attorneys told a federal judge.
The president himself has repeatedly contradicted that claim.
The president has repeatedly argued that courts have no business deciding whether his actions are legal.
It's the latest example of Justice Department attorneys claiming broad and unreviewable powers for the president.
The D.C. Circuit is reviewing an injunction issued by a judge who said "no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have."
The administration has paid $20 billion in refunds. Now, it is asking a federal appeals court to limit which businesses will get the rest.
Blanche is happy to pervert justice in service of the president's personal agenda. No wonder Trump wants to keep him as attorney general.
An addendum to the president's "settlement" of his lawsuit against the IRS shields him and his family from liability for any federal offenses they committed prior to May 19.
The Justice Department signals a retreat from defending the blatantly corrupt scheme, which provoked vigorous objections from Republican lawmakers.
One order temporarily blocks money for the president's "Anti-Weaponization Fund." The other asks whether the agreement is a fraudulent "product of collusion."
The president’s habitual attempts to criminalize dissent hark back to tyrants of yore.
Any self-styled advocate for limited government should be furious about Trump's $1.8 billion slush fund, but few Republicans are willing to denounce it.
After a magistrate judge said a DHS investigator had failed to establish probable cause, the government decided it did not need the YouTube and iPhone records after all.
A judge last week threw out a criminal indictment against him on the grounds that it was tainted by vindictiveness. But that same spirit infects another part of his story that few people have discussed.
The Trump administration invokes the notoriously vague FARA to threaten a critic.
Using taxpayer money to reward the president’s allies has nothing to do with the president's claims against the IRS.
Despite the administration's arguments, a multibillion-dollar settlement fund with no judicial oversight is fairly unprecedented.
In one lawsuit after another, the president has claimed damages in amounts completely disconnected from reality.
Even as the Justice Department files lawsuits aimed at vindicating gun rights, it undermines them in other cases.
While not groundbreaking, the regulatory shifts offer some welcome relief.
Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon argues that both laws violate the Second Amendment by banning arms in common use for lawful purposes.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche implausibly claims prosecutors can prove Comey "knowingly and willfully" threatened to murder the president.
The president is not shy about using government power to punish people for saying things that offend him.
The case defies more than half a century of rulings on the “true threat” exception to the First Amendment.
Such claims are hard for most defendants to prove. But most defendants haven't drawn the public ire of the president.
The brief, which asks a federal judge to reconsider an injunction blocking the project, reads like it was transcribed from the president's Truth Social account.
Even Republican critics of the Federal Reserve chairman's performance rejected the notion that he had broken the law by lying about the renovation of the central bank's headquarters.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's distinction between medical and recreational cannabis is hard to reconcile with the relevant scientific and statutory criteria.
Plus: skyway socialism, reconsider the lobster, D.C.'s urban growth, and more...
"The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence," said acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
The platform creators filed a lawsuit claiming their First Amendment rights were violated after the Trump administration convinced Apple and Facebook to remove their content.
The Justice Department is permanently blocked from prosecuting Californians who fail to register when the state no longer requires it.
After withdrawing a summons in the face of a legal challenge, the government is seeking a grand jury subpoena.
Plus: the insanity of investigating the NFL on antitrust grounds, and should golf be harder?
The feds have arrested an Army staffer who spoke to a journalist for a book about special operations. The journalist says it's retaliation for exposing corruption.
Plus: pro-tech media sells to big tech, Trump's new tariffs, jobs numbers, and more...
Ultimately, Bondi's fulsome defense of the president could not overcome blowback over her handling of the Epstein files.
The agency refused to prosecute alleged national security, labor, and white-collar crime while increasing immigration cases, a new report finds.
But for a fraudulent and misleading warrant affidavit, Taylor would not have been killed during a fruitless late-night drug raid.
The Trump administration wants its federal funding back from Harvard, alleging the Ivy League university did "nothing" about campus antisemitism.
“Officers don’t have the blanket authority to arrest anyone who runs from them,” says an attorney from the Institute for Justice.
Eight others were convicted on vague "terrorism" charges—causing serious concern among First Amendment advocates.
Fans are responsible for sky-high ticket resale prices, not primary ticket sellers.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.