Lindsay Clancy's Holdout Juror Did What Jurors Are Supposed To Do
Just as a holdout may be a bulwark against wrongful conviction, a unanimous verdict is difficult to obtain by design.
Just as a holdout may be a bulwark against wrongful conviction, a unanimous verdict is difficult to obtain by design.
A new campaign by the Cato Institute aims to educate jurors on their right to vote their conscience against unjust laws and sentences.
In the court of public opinion, there is little room for ambiguity here. But those who watched the trial know that reality is far less satisfying.
A SCOTUS petition argues that the practice, which allows a judicial finding of dangerousness based on a preponderance of the evidence, violates the Fifth Amendment.
Half a century after approving coercive plea bargaining, the Supreme Court is beginning to recognize its costs.
The justice criticizes the Court’s endorsement of coercive plea bargaining and its embrace of dubious Fourth Amendment doctrines.
The Supreme Court has "no shortage of tools" to enforce the separation of powers, Justice Neil Gorsuch notes. "The only real question is whether we will use them."
The Supreme Court ruled that "an agreement not to appeal a sentence is unenforceable when it would result in a miscarriage of justice."
The back-to-back setbacks are a striking sign that the mortgage fraud charges against New York's attorney general are legally shaky.
Joe and Russell Marino will finally get their day in court. The ruling represents a turning of the tide when it comes to the fairness of such proceedings, where agencies have long played both prosecutor and jury.
The right to a civil jury trial is far more deeply rooted in American history and tradition than is the right to own guns, which the Supreme Court was right to incorporate.
The case against Michelino Sunseri exemplifies the injustice caused by the proliferation of regulatory crimes—the target of a recent presidential order.
John Moore and Tanner Mansell were convicted of theft after they freed sharks they erroneously thought had been caught illegally.
Retired Judge Gertner and I have filed an amicus brief in support of certiorari to answer the question, which has important important implications for admiralty jurisdiction.
Federal prosecutors argued that John Moore and Tanner Mansell stole property when they hauled in a fishing line they mistakenly believed had been set by poachers.
Thus far, the courts have barred Curtrina Martin from asking a jury for damages. She is appealing to the Supreme Court.
In a new book, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch describes the "human toll" of proliferating criminal penalties.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the Supreme Court ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy "a power grab." She's right, but in the wrong way.
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
The Sixth Amendment was originally seen as vital to preserving liberty. Yet it has been consistently watered down.
School officials falsely accused the boys of posing for a photo in blackface.
Philip Esformes was sentenced for charges on which a jury hung. After receiving a commutation, the federal government vowed to try to put him back in prison.
SpaceX argues the federal agency trying to punish it for firing employees critical of Musk is itself unconstitutional.
Trials are incredibly valuable fact-finding tools—particularly when the defendants are public employees.
Plus: New York City's crackdown on short-term rentals, Brazil's UFO investigations, and more...
Florida will now only require an 8–4 majority for a jury to recommend a death sentence. Alabama is the only other state that allows split juries to recommend death sentences.
"We can't be in a situation where one person can just derail this," DeSantis told a gathering of law enforcement officials.
Oregon was one of only two states that allowed for non-unanimous guilty verdicts until the Supreme Court outlawed them in 2020.
Unfortunately, in five separate cases today, they're outnumbered.
Convincing evidence of his innocence has been available for years. But the criminal legal system prioritizes procedure and bureaucracy over liberty.
The Supreme Court may soon consider if acquitted conduct sentencing is illegal.
A former guidance counselor served six years of a 25-year sentence thanks to a public defender's incompetence.
Third post in the symposium on the National Constitution Center "Restoring the Guardrails of Democracy" project. Walter Olson presents the Team Libertarian Report.
Michael Picard's free speech rights were violated when he was booked for telling passersby to "Google Jury Nullification."
I coauthored the report with Clark Neily and Walter Olson, both of the Cato Institute.
The project includes reports by conservative, libertarian, and progressive teams. I am coauthor of the Team Libertarian report.
John Adams called jury trials part of the "heart and lungs of liberty." Today, defendants are often punished for exercising that very right.
Such victims are often told they have no right to sue.
The agency’s tactics doomed the prosecution of defendants who allegedly planned to kidnap Michigan's governor.
Plus: The View eats its own, NPR ignores a victory for Asian-Americans, and more...
The Second Amendment right is vibrant and prominent for many citizens. The Seventh Amendment right has shriveled to a husk of its former self.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.