Law, Justice, and the Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Neither side is ideal. But both law and justice are far more on Ukraine's side than Vladimir Putin's.
Neither side is ideal. But both law and justice are far more on Ukraine's side than Vladimir Putin's.
Plus: Republican policy priorities, SCOTUS to take same-sex wedding website refusal case, and more...
Plus: CDC withholds data, court upholds nutritionist licensing, Ottawa police break up Freedom Convoy, and more...
Under Obama, Trump, and now Biden, U.S. arms deals with Saudi Arabia have perpetuated a humanitarian crisis.
According to a new YouGov/Concerned Veterans for America poll, veterans and military families are most opposed to U.S. conflict with Russia.
“Defend the Guard” laws would keep state troops out of conflicts that Congress hasn’t authorized.
After disappointment in Afghanistan, Americans show no eagerness for a new conflict.
"A future of bloodless global discipline is a chilling thing."
Biden rightly stuck to his guns when he defended the long-overdue U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, but he fails to apply the same logic elsewhere.
Supplying the Ukrainian army hasn’t stopped Putin.
Only about 100 Afghans who have applied for temporary admission to the U.S. have been approved.
That would have been a huge mistake.
Why is registration for involuntary servitude still a thing?
Multiple military authorizations are still intact and we've still got troops in Iraq and elsewhere. And that's not even counting the drone strikes.
There will likely never be a full accounting of the war's cost, but as much as $600 billion might have simply vanished due to waste, fraud, and incompetence.
Shameful scenes like those in Kabul don’t have to happen if we avoid military interventions.
Plus: Backpage on trial, Texas abortion providers ask SCOTUS to stop ban, vegan "butter" and "cheese" are safe, and more…
Nativists like J.D. Vance warn that we need to be "properly vetting" the Afghans coming to the U.S., neglecting to mention just how safe these people are.
The final price tag could eventually exceed $6 trillion, and American taxpayers will be paying the tab when the 50th anniversary of 9/11 arrives.
Why did it take presidents so long to realize this?
You can both support withdrawal and recognize its failed execution.
What Afghan civilians need now is resettlement, not remilitarization.
Plus: A history of U.S. sex work prohibition and its harms, against the Open App Markets Act, and more...
Plus: YouTube and radicalization, the infrastructure sham, and more...
It may look like Congress is reclaiming its constitutional war powers, but the president still has plenty of ways to justify his military actions.
It is easy to be indifferent to a war if you are oblivious to its costs.
Sen. Lindsey Graham says it would be Biden's "biggest mistake yet," but the U.S. troop departure is long overdue.
Unable to tap into the immigration pathway for Afghan helpers, these men and their families opted to flee elsewhere.
Keeping American boots on the ground means keeping them in harm's way.
Plus: Sha'Carri Richardson might miss Olympics over positive pot test, 130 countries agree to broad strokes of a global minimum corporate tax, and more...
The Kafkaesque visa program for U.S.-affiliated Afghans puts thousands at grave risk.
Repeal would do little to change how Congress and the president collaborate—or don't—on military operations.
Whistleblowers and publishers are crucial for keeping government officials reasonably honest.
Plus: Remembering Steve Horwitz, Oregonians can temporarily pump their own gas, and more...
As the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan approaches, the legislation would reform the Afghan interpreters' visa program.
Repealing the law that allowed America to depose Saddam Hussein won't stop us from waging war elsewhere.
Even as U.S. troops come home, ongoing operations could allow a covert conflict to continue.
Thank the troops, but question the uses to which they’re put.
A significant portion of the world views the U.S. as a threat to democracy in their home countries.
We’ll have to pay attention this time to ensure a conclusion to the accidental forever war.
After nearly 20 years, America's longest war could soon be over. But delaying withdrawal for what seems like symbolic reasons is questionable.
Joe Biden doesn’t have to feel bad about bringing the troops home if he lets the persecuted come here.
Many U.S. complaints about China aren’t about actions that threaten U.S. security.
I argue that the recent air strike was legal, but overall US military intervention in Syria still lacks required congressional authorization. Biden may be trying to change that; but history gives reason for skepticism.
This initiative might help restore congressional control over war authorization. But there is reason for skepticism that it will pan out.
Anne-Marie Slaughter hasn’t given up on intervention and the “responsibility to protect” doctrine.
The Biden administration should take advantage of the opportunity to cut our losses instead of continuing the forever war.
We have an agreement to pull out by May. We should honor it regardless of the state of the country.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks