Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
A transatlantic pie fight, a pecunious divorce, and a putrid pool of purple ink.
A transatlantic pie fight, a pecunious divorce, and a putrid pool of purple ink.
U.S. District Judge Michael Simon reminds the feds that they are bound by the First Amendment.
A president from a party supposedly committed to restraining the federal government is now sending enforcers to cities over local objections.
Justice Gorsuch needs to account for both text and precedent when interpreting old statutes.
The reporter made a good-faith mistake based on an incomplete PACER download. Judge Callahan should apologize.
But the real story are DHS' s painful lies to SDNY
The protests continue, as does the tear gassing.
Nationwide, 80% of first-time test takers pass the bar exam, and 90% will pass within two years. But 10% of takers will not have passed after two years, and some will never pass.
I try to make sense of the votes in the Faithless Electors Cases and the Creek Nation Cases
A reminder from Judge Thapar that insults and invective are no substitute for argument.
The federal police presence in Portland has enraged demonstrators. It's also taken pressure off the local justice center.
A 2018 Reason investigation showed how Chicago's impound program ensnared innocent owners, stripped them of their cars, and soaked them in debt.
Plus: "learning pods" are an unfair target, COVID-19 reinfections are unlikely, and more...
Judges Luck and Logoa (CA11) asked questions about a Florida law while they were serving on the Florida Supreme Court, but did not decide the case.
"The Movants are undoubtedly correct in asserting that 'nationwide sanctions' are rare, but that is only because they are rarely warranted."
The Sierra Club conflates illegal conduct with the ability to challenge illegal conduct in court.
The standard under Minnesota law for what is impermissible harassment, the Minnesota Court of Appeals concludes, is objective, not subjective.
Three justices bitterly dissented. One observed that after Hurricane Katrina, some test-takers had to retake portions of the bar exam.
American voters know what's up.
Rutgers English Department says grammar is racist.
If you've seen the Smithsonian American History Museum's "white culture" graphic, you know what I mean.
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
The president’s heavy-handed response to protests against police brutality belies his promise of "law and order."
The Fifth Circuit struck the brief. Judge Brasher (CA11) recused.
The line between peace officer and soldier of war has become far too blurry.
Threats Against Federal Judges on the Rise
"A lot of people think that law enforcement must be provided by a [government] monopoly," says economist Edward Stringham. But "there are plenty of private examples of people working to create order and safety in society."
Plus: Portland protest updates, Kanye's candidacy, the ACLU's suit to protect Michael Cohen, and more...
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
No one should be forced to pay for officers who spend their days opposing policing reform and defending bad cops.
The Hawaii senator fails to fully consider the causes of bad policing.
It's Schrems II in episode 325 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Trump and other White House officials say the feds may soon be coming to other major cities as well.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks