NYPD

New York Police Unions Partly Succeed in Stopping Release of Misconduct Records

A federal judge gags the New York Civil Liberties Union, but a media outlet manages to collect and publish a database of misbehaving cops.

|

New York City's police and fire unions are fighting in court to block the release of their members' disciplinary records. They've temporarily won one fight, but they may have already lost the war.

New York state has finally—after years of activism from police reformers demanding transparency—repealed Section 50-a, the rule that shielded police and firefighter personnel records from public disclosure laws. The statute had been applied so broadly that it was all but impossible to know what sort of discipline, if any, misbehaving officers faced.

Naturally, the police unions were not going to just step aside as the records were distributed. And so New York is now seeing what we saw in California last year when the Golden State ended its official regime of police record secrecy: lawsuits.

On July 14, a group of seven law enforcement and firefighter unions in New York City filed a federal lawsuit against Mayor Bill de Blasio and other city officials to attempt to stop a mass public release of disciplinary records, most specifically records that were "non-final, unsubstantiated, exonerated, or resulted in a finding of not guilty." The lawsuit argues that even though Section 50-a has been repealed, releasing these past records violates the Due Process rights of the officers and collective bargaining agreements that assured they'd be kept confidential. (To read the lawsuit, Uniformed Fire Officers Association et al v. De Blasio et al, go here.)

On Wednesday evening, the unions won a temporary reprieve from Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, who, in an oral ruling, temporarily blocked the de Blasio administration from releasing these records until the case could be litigated.

But thousands of these records had already been passed along to the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) in response to a records request. Even though the NYCLU is not a party to this lawsuit, Failla nevertheless ordered that the NYCLU refrain from disclosing them to the public.

The NYCLU is not pleased, and it has filed a motion to get Failla's gag order overruled, arguing that the court order is unconstitutional prior restraint. NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman has noted that the NYCLU "obtained police misconduct data lawfully, and we vehemently disagree with the court's unprecedented order to bar the publishing of these records….We'll keep fighting to bring police misconduct into the light of day and make sure police are held accountable."

Gagging the NYCLU didn't stop some discipline records from getting released. The nonprofit media outfit ProPublica also asked the New York's Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) for disciplinary records and received data on thousands of police. They are under no orders from Failla not to publish them, so they've put together a database of active duty officers who have had at least one complaint against them substantiated. Turns out that around 4,000 of the city's 36,000-person police force has had some sort of misconduct complaint deemed substantiated by the CCRB.

ProPublica's database is accessible here. As you read it, keep a couple of caveats in mind. First, the database contains only complaints that were evaluated by the CCRB, plus their findings. The CCRB investigates accusations of mistreatment of civilians by police officers, but not other types of potential police misconduct in the line of duty, such as perjury or corruption. Those other crimes and types of misconduct are investigated by the NYPD's Internal Affairs Bureau and are not part of this database.

Second, the information in the database is very simple. It has the officers' names, some very basic information about what they were accused of, and a contextless listing of the CCRB's recommendations, including possible charges. But these are just recommendations. The CCRB lacks the authority to actually discipline cops. These findings are sent to the police commissioner for the final decision on what to actually do, though the CCRB does have attorneys who can prosecute officers at internal disciplinary trials. So when the database states that the CCRB recommended "charges," this should not be taken to mean that the officer was definitively charged with misconduct and faced some sort of a trial.

All of which to say that all of this information in this database is just the tip of the iceberg. It still doesn't give a clear sense of the extent that NYPD officers are held accountable for conduct that crosses the line.

It's going to take at least months, and probably years, before New Yorkers can truly figure out what the NYPD does with their bad apples. And the police unions will be fighting every step of the way.

Advertisement

NEXT: RIP Arnold Trebach, Who Helped Make Opposition to the Drug War Respectable

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. ALL police should be wearing constantly running body cameras and those records should be available to the public. They are simply records of reality, history and there is no subjective narration.

    Personnel records are subjectivity narrated for career development. They are not the public’s business.

    1. Personally, I don’t want to see cops when they take a break to use the restroom. Always-on is impractical. But when you give cops the ability to turn the cameras off when it makes sense, you inevitably give bad cops the ability to turn them off when they shouldn’t.

      I’d rather see a policy of always-on-when-on-duty coupled with a presumption of spoliation and adverse inference whenever the cop “forgets” to turn it back on.

      And while I’m wishing for a pony, I’d also like a complete repeal of qualified immunity and replacement with malpractice insurance at the individual officer level. Let the bad cops become uninsurable to the point that they have to find other careers.

      1. The cameras need to continually record so there is never any excuse for missing evidence.

        The time spent in private is nobody else’s business and would never need to be disclosed.

        Doing what makes sense should never be considered wishing for the unattainable.

        Qualified immunity will be exposed for the bullshit it is when it’s compared to body cam evidence. Then it will go away.

        1. My last month’s on-line earning was $17930 simply by doing a straightforward job on-line. best home primarily based on-line job to earn additional greenbacks monthly simply by doing work for optimum two to three hrs daily.GFv. I actually have joined this job concerning three months past and in my 1st month I actually have created $12k+ simply with none special on-line expertise. everyone on this earth will get this job nowadays and begin creating money on-line by simply follow details on this web site……… HERE══════►►►Money90

        2. As soon as you allow some recording to be “private”, you’ve opened up a massive loophole.

          Incentives are the trick. Here are two ideas:

          1. Only pay them for recorded on-duty publicly viewable time. I am serious — either record and post in real-time, or post it at end of shift. If it’s not viewable by end of shift, you don’t get paid for that day, ever.

          2. No cop testimony without video to back it up. Cop has to answer questions about the video from the jury, in addition to the defense lawyer.

          1. Private means nobody else involved.

            Why would the public need to see what the police do when they are alone?

            The incentive needs to be employment.

            1. The camera is on the cop. Technically for a body mounted camera, you never see what that particular copy is doing.

              Might be interesting though if two cops had an illicit interlude.

              1. Cops rarely act alone.

                There will be so many angles of every interaction I don’t see how cops could get away with anything.

                1. I Make Money At H0me.Let’s start work offered by Google!!Yes,this is definitely the most financially rewarding Job I’ve had . Last Monday I bought a great Lotus Elan after I been earning $9534 this-last/5 weeks and-a little over, $10k last month .GRf . I started this four months/ago and immediately started to bring home minimum $97 per/hr

                  Heres what I do…………►Click here

    2. Making Cash more than $15k to $18k consistently just by doing basic online work. I have gotten $18376 a month ago just by working on the web. Its a simple and basic occupation to do from home and its profit are greatly improved than customary office work. Each individual can join this activity now just by pursue this link……..go to this site home media tech tab for more detail support your hear Here══════❥❥❥❥USA Dollars.com

  2. Public employee unions are gangs conspiring against citizens.
    Police unions are vicious, armed gangs conspiring against citizens.

  3. Does the rule apply to ALL government employees or ONLY police?

  4. Police unions should be banned. Along with all other public employee unions of course.

    1. I can’t believe I got into an argument with multiple people over this fact. They all want the cop unions busted. When I bring up the other government employee unions, these same people shit themselves defending them. “Oh yeah, let’s punish teachers because cops are bastards.” smh

  5. Just a bit over 10%? I’m impressed.

    1. I’m more than a bit surprised. I had thought that the numbers would be more along 1-2% rather than over 10%. I thought it was bad enough “98% were covering for the 2%”. With these numbers, I’m seeing it’s a much larger problem. Sunlight really is the best disinfectant.

    2. job opportunity for everyone! Work from comfort of your home, on your computer And you cAn work with your own working hours. You cAn work this job As A pArt time or As A full time job. You cAn eArn from 65$ An hour to 1000$ A dAy! There is no limitAtions, it All depends from you And how much you wAnt to eArn eAch dAy…..Click Here For More Detail.

  6. I am also conceptually against having unsubstantiated claims released publicly. But since LEO’s routinely publicize the name of anyone ever remotely accused of anything, I’ll get over it.

  7. Anyone care to let me in on how that song and dance works?

  8. It’s not going to show critical thinkers anything that they didn’t already know.
    “The whole good cop/bad cop question can be disposed of much more decisively. We need not enumerate what proportion of cops appears to be good or listen to someone’s anecdote about his Uncle Charlie, an allegedly good cop. We need only consider the following: (1) a cop’s job is to enforce the laws, all of them; (2) many of the laws are manifestly unjust, and some are even cruel and wicked; (3) therefore every cop has agreed to act as an enforcer for laws that are manifestly unjust or even cruel and wicked. There are no good cops.” ~Robert Higgs

  9. Google easily work and google pays me every hour and every week just $5K to $8K for doing online work from home. I am a universty student and I work n my part time just 2 to 3 hours a day easily from home. Now every one can earn extra cash for doing online home system and make a good life by just open this website and follow instructions on this page…ReadMore.

  10. Going up against unions is simply not in the Democrats’ blood.

Please to post comments