Voting Rights

Iowa Governor Restores Voting Rights to Tens of Thousands With Felony Records

Iowa was the last state in the U.S. with a lifetime voting ban for anyone with a felony record.


Three months shy of the 2020 presidential election, Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed an executive order today restoring voting rights to tens of thousands of Iowans with felony records.

Iowa was the last state in the U.S. with a lifetime voting ban for anyone with a felony record.

"Quite simply, when someone serves their sentence and pays the price our justice system has set for their crimes, they should have their right to vote restored, automatically, plain and simple," Reynolds said.

A 2016 report by the Sentencing Project found that there were roughly 52,000 Iowans barred for life from voting because of a felony record. At the time of the report, Iowa was one of four states with lifetime felony disenfranchisement. However, last December Kentucky restored voting rights to an estimated 140,000 residents. The last two Virginia governors have issued executive orders similar to Reynolds', and Florida voters passed a constitutional amendment in 2018 restoring voting rights to those with felony records who completed the terms of their sentences.

"Disenfranchising people with criminal convictions is a vestige of Jim Crow laws," said Eliza Sweren-Becker, counsel with the Voting Rights and Elections Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, in a statement. "As of today, this shameful policy has no place in the United States."

Civil liberties groups have been whittling away at felony disenfranchisement laws for decades, but there's been an added urgency to those efforts as the 2020 election draws closer. A number of civil liberties groups are currently fighting a protracted legal battle with the state of Florida over felon voting rights that could impact an estimated 775,000 residents in the crucial swing state.

The language of Florida's constitutional amendment didn't specify whether felony offenders had to pay off their court fines and fees to regain voting eligibility. Florida Republicans passed legislation making the restoration of voting rights contingent on paying off fines and fees. However, Democrats and civil liberties groups say that amounts to a poll tax.

A federal judge ruled in May agreed with them, in part, and ruled that Florida's law was unconstitutionally discriminatory because it blocked those who couldn't afford to pay their fines from voting. However, that ruling is temporarily stayed pending a hearing before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals later this month.

Notably, Reynolds' order does not make paying fines and fees a requirement for regaining voting eligibility. It does, however, exclude those convicted of homicide and manslaughter offenses, as well as those still completing probation or parole.

Civil liberties groups and local activists have been pressing Reynolds on the issue for months. Their ultimate goal is an amendment to the state constitution to keep a future governor from reversing the order.

That's exactly what happened the last time Iowa governor restored the right to vote. In 2005, Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack issued an executive order re-enfranchising all state residents who had completed their sentences. His successor, Gov Terry Branstad, reversed that executive order in 2011.

"While we're delighted that immediately so many Iowans are eligible to register and vote, it's important that we continue to pursue a more permanent fix to the problem of felony disenfranchisement in our state," the Iowa chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement.

NEXT: The Cops Took This Guy's Car Because He Unwittingly Rented It to an Alleged Drug Dealer

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. In recognition, I give to you a song about Iowa suitable for picking up women.

    Iowa, by Dar Williams

    1. I would have gone with “I owe a lot to Iowa pot”.

      Damn Reason won’t let me link.

    2. ●▬▬▬▬PART TcIME JOBS▬▬▬▬▬●

      I am making $165 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience masses freedom now that i’m my non-public boss. that is what I do……
      ↓↓↓↓COPY THIS SITE↓↓↓↓


  2. Excellent news.


    1. I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without a doubt, this is the easiest and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had.HFd I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally changed my life.

      For more details visit………► Cash Mony System

  3. And I’m sure they will all go to vote. No just kidding the least likely voters are youth, criminals and minorities. So zero impact and Iowa is not in play.

  4. my mom’s gonna be pissed.

    1. Wicked pissed or just 2 sheets to the wind?

      1. she’s Iowan. 2 sheets from drinking cornahol.

  5. I don’t have a problem with restoring voter rights in state for a person who has paid for their crime. But each and every one of them should march themselves down to the voter registration office all on their own to register to vote. No one should be registered to vote automatically, it should require some civil effort.

    1. Don’t you know, non-whites and criminals are not capable of registering to vote. Expecting them to do so, that’s racist! /sarc

    2. Another rousing meeting of Libertarians For Authoritarian Voting Restrictions has been convened!

      The reception afterward will be sponsored by Bigot Clingers In Unconvincing Libertarian Drag.

  6. Why just the right to vote?

    If she really wanted to impress, she should have added 2A rights as well.

  7. How about a compromise where civil participation (voting rights + gun rights + jury eligibility + office eligibility etc) is suspended for a period equal to the full sentence, and that suspension is tacked onto the end of full sentence regardless of parole etc?

    I like that ex-cons be granted immediate economic opportunity so they can earn an income. Indeed, prison programs should operate like internships for smooth return to society. However, I also think that all offenders (of legitimate crimes, not “victimless”) should re-establish a trust (not re-offend) before they are allowed any power over me and mine.

  8. We have made too many crimes felonies that should go by a lesser charge, but instead of fixing those errors, we dumb down the seriousness of the punishment of a felony because that is easier than cleaning up the actual mess.

  9. This is good and should be commended. I don’t know how many of these former felons will exercise their right to vote but I think it good they be given the opportunity. A strong democracy need as many participants as it can possibly get.

  10. Every month start earning more cash from $20,000 to $24,000 by working very simple j0b 0nline from home. I have earned last month $23159 from this by just doing this 0nline w0rk for maximum 3 to 4 hrs a day using my laptop. This home j0b is just awesome and regular earning from this are much times better than other regular 9 to 5 desk j0b. Now every person on this earth can get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow instructions on the given web page….Click For Full Details.

  11. Start making cash online work easily from home.i have received a paycheck of $24K in this month by working online from home.i am a student and i just doing this job in my spare HERE? Read More

  12. Iowa was the last state in the U.S. with a lifetime voting ban for anyone with a felony record.

    Why did we agree to allow this State to have first shot at eliminating candidates?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.