Immigration Authorities Want Access to All the Raw Intelligence the Feds Already Collected on You
And Donald Trump just might be the president to give ICE free rein.
And Donald Trump just might be the president to give ICE free rein.
Officials want to track every financial transaction you make, and they see cryptocurrencies and cash alike as barriers to achieving that goal.
Gorsuch advances another property rights theory of the Fourth Amendment that Alito rejects.
Mass surveillance is up and running on Britain's roads. Will ours be next?
A patchwork of state-level systems accomplishes what Americans have specifically rejected, and perhaps far more.
Think immigration crackdowns don't affect you? You're wrong.
Illinois and Texas think biometric identifiers are a lawsuit waiting to happen.
The government now says it will prosecute only those it can prove committed specific criminal acts.
The NSA's surveillance of international communications is not limited to "foreign bad guys on foreign land."
Lawmakers will advance legislation that expands the power of the feds to snoop on American citizens.
Push by lawmakers for stricter warrant requirements fails.
Hours later he walks it back.
Cited for building the treehouse without a proper permit, the family must now file for permits to tear it down.
House to vote on a bill that would codify unwarranted searches of Americans' communications.
Motel 6 sued for passing names along to ICE.
The President shut down the commission because numerous states refused to turn over voter data, citing concerns about privacy and state sovereignty.
Do we need a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to drive?
The federal government has no business using information gathered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act against Americans.
An interesting incident from England, as reported by the Sunday Times.
Short extension of FISA snooping powers shoved into temporary spending bill.
Will you soon be ordered to subject yourself to even more intrusive surveillance if you travel out of the country?
The good news? Many whose lives they tried to ruin are now off the hook.
Senators demand discussion of protections for Americans against unwarranted snooping.
Can they get past the FBI vs. Trump narrative to talk about snooping on the rest of us?
"Around the corner, there's a family neighborhood that's decorated for Christmas," a local television station reports while airing her photo.
A detective who was later charged with molesting children performed the humiliating search while investigating consensual sexting.
Worried about your genetic privacy? Then don't take the tests.
"Most Americans, I think, still want to avoid Big Brother."
Congress might quietly expand the feds' surveillance powers without any actual debate.
What's at issue today in Carpenter v. United States.
A cellphone tracking case gives SCOTUS a chance to reconsider a doctrine that threatens everyone's privacy.
Congress must make a choice before the end of the year on the level of protections Americans get from unwarranted snooping.
Every attempt to restrain and reform unwarranted domestic surveillance batted away.
Another possible standoff where officials want to compromise everybody's data security.
House leadership rejects stronger protections shielding Americans from unwarranted snooping.
Will snooping reauthorizations just get quietly dumped into a spending bill?
The Fourth Amendment matters to some legislators.
A right to engage in prostitution seems like "a natural extension of Supreme Court precedent," says judge.
Activists fear secret surveillance. Push for firmly enforced rules instead of bans.
What Rosenstein wants would threaten data security. That's hardly responsible.
Microsoft resisted order for emails on servers in Ireland.
The web host can redact user info unless the Justice Department provides evidence of criminal activity.
BuzzFeed reports federal agencies violating the rules to engage in warrantless domestic snooping of financial information.
The backdoor, warrantless searches won't end, but will see new limits.
Amber Rudd admits that she doesn't understand encryption while insisting on the need to undermine it.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks