NSA

Here's How Some Lawmakers Want to Reform Federal Surveillance. Prepare to Be Disappointed

The backdoor, warrantless searches won't end, but will see new limits.

|

NSA chip
Badboo / Dreamstime

A first look at a draft version of changes to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) reveals modest restrictions on how federal agencies can collect and access Americans' communications without a warrant.

The revisions, dubbed the USA Liberty Act of 2017, would require a court order to get access to these communications, unless the requests for access involve investigating terrorism or espionage. That narrows the "backdoor" the government has used to snoop on Americans without warrants, but it doesn't close really close it.

Civil rights and privacy rights groups have been fighting for changes, their efforts bolstered by Edward Snowden's revelations about the size and scope of domestic snooping.

Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), responded to the draft that this revision still leaves open potential surveillance abuses against American citizens:

"While the bill contains positive provisions that are an improvement over current practice, it falls short of what is needed to protect individuals from warrantless government surveillance under Section 702. Its most glaring deficiency is that it only partially closes the so-called 'backdoor search loophole.'

"The bill would still allow the CIA, NSA, FBI, and other agencies to search through emails, text messages, and phone calls for information about people in the U.S. without a probable cause warrant from a judge. Those worried that current or future presidents will use Section 702 to spy on political opponents, surveil individuals based on false claims that their religion makes them a national security threat, or chill freedom of speech should be concerned that these reforms do not go far enough.

One other positive reform in the bill: It would legislatively end the practice of drawing in communications that referenced or were "about" the subject of an investigation, rather than to or from a subject. The NSA had been accessing communications by Americans that mentioned a person they were investigating (without a warrant), even though they are not part of an investigation. Evidence shows they had been scooping up all sorts of communications to which they had no legal access.

The NSA decided to end this type of surveillance earlier in the year. This bill would codify an end to the practice until 2023.

Section 702 provides some of the authorizations the National Security Agency (NSA) and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) use to snoop on foreign targets, be they potentially terrorists or other foreign agents. But Section 702 has also been used to secretly collect and snoop on communications by Americans, and the private information used for domestic crime-fighting, all without getting warrants.

Section 702 also expires this year, so Congress must act if they want to preserve it. The version being released right now is being pitched by members of the House Judiciary Committee as a compromise between those who want firm Fourth Amendment protections and those who want to keep the federal agencies' broad surveillance authorities.

As Dustin Volz at Reuters notes, this draft bill will not be the only proposal on the table. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) are expected to introduce a version that would be stricter about demanding warrants to access Americans' communications. Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) are expected to introduce a version that does even less than the one detailed here.

The Trump administration wants no changes at all and wants Section 702 renewed permanently, even though President Donald Trump claims to have been inappropriately snooped on by the Obama administration. But it seems clear that Congress is not going to renew Section 702 as is, so we'll have to see which compromises win out.

Or, perhaps Congressional dysfunction could cause Section 702 to expire entirely. ReasonTV suggested Congress let Section 702 lapse, since it is so prone to surveillance abuses. Watch below, and listen to a discussion on federal surveillance authorities from South by Southwest earlier this year hosted by Reason here:

NEXT: Blitzkrieg to sitzkrieg to twitzkrieg

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. The bill would still allow the CIA, NSA, FBI, and other agencies to search through emails, text messages, and phone calls for information about people in the U.S. without a probable cause warrant from a judge.

    Don’t worry, we have the Fourth Amendment for that.

  2. USA Liberty Act of 2017

    Oh good grief. Heaven spare us from ostentatious legislation names.

    Maybe that’s how we can get actual tax reform. Just call it the “USA Patriot Liberty America Apple Pie Baseball Stars and Stripes Forever Act”

  3. This law as well as the Patriot Act are violations of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution [period]


  4. The Trump administration wants no changes at all and wants Section 702 renewed permanently, even though President Donald Trump claims to have been inappropriately snooped on by the Obama administration…

    Well, we actually know he was given what’s already been released. The fact that Trump wants to keep it isn’t too surprising though since he already knows that he won’t be punished for doing it to his political enemies this next time around, but I don’t think he’ll like the fact that the guys in charge of those programs hate his guts and more likely to leak communications from Trump than they are to willingly spy on people who support the bureaucracies endless growth.

    We’re already a Banana Republic, so it’s hardly surprising when this type of thing happens.

  5. You’re going to need more than a warrant to gain access to my backdoor.

    1. Okay, Cherry Pie and a Zima, that’s my final offer.

      1. Done.

  6. Section 702 also expires this year, so Congress must act if they want to preserve it.

    Like the NSA and CIA, et al, give a shit what laws Congress makes or doesn’t make. We’re no longer a nation of laws in case you haven’t noticed. Hell, Clapper or one of them said as much in Congressional testimony when he said his job was to keep America safe and he was going to do his job regardless of what the law says.

    1. Pretty much this. They have, once again, escaped their leash as they are wont to do. It’s arguable that they were ever on a leash in the first place, I think.

  7. It’s damn hard putting Genie’s back in bottles.

  8. “The revisions, dubbed the USA Liberty Act of 2017, would require a court order to get access to these communications, unless the requests for access involve investigating terrorism or espionage.”

    FFS, that’s all it was originally supposed to be for according to these assholes. If they had told that truth, that 80% of it is for drug crimes, 19% white collar crimes, and 1% violent crimes/terrorism/espionage, they might have had trouble passing it. Fascist fucks.

  9. Here’s How Some Lawmakers Want to Reform Federal Surveillance. Prepare to Be Disappointed – Hit & Run : Reason.comis the best post by imo for pc Please visit imo app imo app snaptube for pc snaptube app

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.