Tennessee's Anti-Drag Bill Is a Gaudy Public Performance
It’s already illegal to expose minors to obscenity, so what is this bill really for?
It’s already illegal to expose minors to obscenity, so what is this bill really for?
by Prof. Peter de Marneffe (Ariz. State).
When society criminalizes outdoor independence, it makes smart phone addiction more likely.
It's a threat to our fundamental rights, but courts refuse to change their approach.
"The current law is that parents have a right to direct the education of their child,'' said the bill's sponsor. "And this is a parents' rights state.''
There can be no freedom of association without the freedom to disassociate from views you find erroneous, dangerous, or repulsive.
"The bill is an aggressive and blatantly unconstitutional attempt to rewrite defamation law in a manner that protects the powerful from criticism by journalists and the public," said one attorney.
The mystery writer and cultural critic is an outspoken defender of free thinking and cultural appropriation.
Plus: The U.S. Supreme Court considers another internet free speech case, the Department of Transportation pushes expensive new rail regs, and more...
The Fox Business host stood out as a champion of the baroque conspiracy theory that implicated Dominion Voting Systems in election fraud.
Plus: the editors field a listener question on intellectual property.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of the decentralized protocol Nostr with NVK, Damus app creator Will Casarin, Nick Gillespie, and Zach Weissmueller.
Let Augustus Gloop be fat.
After a tragic on-set accident, a district attorney used a law passed after the incident to threaten Baldwin with years in jail.
The statute required no-boycott-of-Israel terms in Arkansas government contracts; the Eighth Circuit had held that the law doesn't violate the First Amendment.
Politicians in Syria, Turkey, and the United States are getting in the way of relief efforts.
Plus: The National Endowment for Democracy ends funding of conservative media blacklist, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear major internet free speech case, and more...
The El Paso incident from a few days ago, the FBI 2021 statistics, and more.
Section 230 helped the internet flourish. Now its scope is under scrutiny.
War by Other Means tells the story of those conscientious objectors who did not cooperate with the government's alternative-service schemes.
"[P]ublic access is designed not only to allow the press and the public to follow high-profile cases, but also to permit ongoing and future access. Law students or legal scholars review case files for law review articles, attorneys review past cases when similar litigation arises, and litigation may be a source of information for policy-makers considering, for example, safety regulations or for journalists reporting more broadly on either the courts or the subject matter of particular litigation."
The University of Washington thus wasn't barred by the First Amendment from disclosing such names in response to a People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals public records request.
Hosts and producers privately called Trump lawyer Sidney Powell's claims "complete bs," "insane," and "unbelievably offensive."
Brokers will have to report every trade and the trader’s personal information.
"Coaches must generally consider a variety of factors—both objective and subjective—in managing a team, and these factors include concerns about distractions, team cohesion, and morale."
No success for the plaintiffs, at least at this stage.
"Today's decision is a victory for the First Amendment that should be celebrated by everyone who hopes to see the internet continue as a place where even difficult and contentious issues can be debated and discussed freely," said one attorney.
When COVID-19 and the U.S. government stopped kids from seeing each other, social media was their lifeline.
Chair Lina Khan has flouted the rule of law and due process, Commissioner Christine Wilson wrote.
... Without Due Process Rights (in the Private Sector Workplace)?"
Gonzalez v. Google presents the Supreme Court’s first opportunity to weigh in on Section 230.
Plus: New York "hate speech" law is likely unconstitutional, FTC Commissioner quits because of chair Lina Khan's antics, and more...
The government is refining its ability to track your movements with little discussion.
A government-supported organization's controversial ratings of online news sources illustrate the challenge of deciding what qualifies as disinformation.